On Friday, July 12, 2013 was a momentous event that could have an impact on the world. Former Director of the International Monetary Fund Dominique Strauss — Kahn became a member of the Supervisory Board of Russian Regional Development Bank (IBRD), the bank left the representatives of Morgan Stenley. It is not superfluous to recall that Morgan Stenley is part of JP Morgan Rockefeller, as well as the interesting fact that, before the American Depression of the 30’s of the last century, JP Morgan is 80% controlled by the Rothschilds, but the influence of the Rockefellers in the middle of the twentieth century, it was limitless and bank Morgan became part of the Rockefeller empire. Bank name of "Rosneft" Igor Sechin VBRR suggests the analogy with the EBRD, but the analogy is only superficial. It is well known that the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development is funded by the United States, has its headquarters — a flat in London and has been actively involved in the "Arab Spring" by transferring funds mercenaries from Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Since 2010, the Bank does not conduct financial transactions in Europe, completely switching to the Ukraine, Russia and Kazakhstan. The result of this work was an attempt to organize the "Arab Spring" in Russia, but the mendacity and mediocrity opposition leaders embezzle funds allotted, left London without the comforting results. In addition to funding the revolutions around the world, this "European" bank at the beginning of its existence, in 1991, led Zh.Attali, the ideologist of the citizens of the world — without a family of nomads, the people and the country, so that the focus of the bank — intelligence center is quite obvious.
But not entirely clear role IBRD and inviting Dominique Strauss-Kahn, and the vacant seat of the chairman of the bank, no longer belongs to the ubiquitous Rockefellers. Try to understand. First of all, very interesting figure of the former director of the IMF Dominique Strauss-Kahn and his arrest May 14, 2011 in the U.S. on trumped up charges of a sexual nature, after which he was removed from the management of the IMF and his political career collapsed. But why there was such a provocation with the director of the IMF?
April 3, 2011 Dominique Strauss-Kahn in Washington made a statement which shocked everyone present at the annual meeting of the IMF. Director of the Fund criticized the principles of the "Washington consensus," which, by the way, are still the financial law for Russia, calling them unsustainable and dangerous to the economies of developing countries and beyond. Dominique Strauss-Kahn called on to impose high taxes on the financial sector, with an emphasis on increasing social obligations of the state:
In the longer term, sustainable growth is associated with a more equitable distribution of income. We need a new kind of globalization, a fairer globalization. Globalization with a Human Face. The benefits of economic growth should be widely distributed, and not simply be assigned to a handful of privileged people.
How could economic community to forgive Dominique Strauss-Kahn this limitation of its influence, and even share some of the capital to the poor segments of society? For social conditions of existence of a state — night watchman capital mechanisms have been derivatives, currency swaps and other instruments of financial fraud in large-scale, allowed fabulously rich in the last 30 years? Of course not, and Director of the IMF publicly humiliated others to be buried nepovadno invade the sphere of the powerful. What is the "Washington Consensus" of why the financial magnates and the U.S. State Department so afraid of the lifting of the economic levers?
Brief provisions of the "Washington Consensus":
- Undertake a rapid and total privatization
- Dramatically cut social spending
- Start the policy bankruptcy of unprofitable enterprises
- Ensure strict budgetary discipline in order to reduce the deficit
- Inflation control
- Free movement of capital
- Encouraging foreign investment
- Free exchange rate
- Reducing the level of state intervention in economic processes
These nine points, taken into service Gaidar team actually destroyed the Russian economy, making our country a part of the colonial expansion of the U.S. and the UK. For economic redistribution of property have been added to the Constitution and laws of the Russian Federation, forever fixing the dependence of the political and economic system of our country on the decisions of the U.S. State Department. Gaidar, Chubais, Kudrin, Yasin, Livshits, and other agents of foreign (American) influence in Russia is not only carried out a coup, taking away the benefit of foreign companies ownership of our country, but also gave the Rothschilds the financial system, as it is in Washington and London decide what will be the issue of the ruble and the cost of petro-dollars, purchased by the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, where vehicles are also agents of foreign influence. Moreover, the solutions to fix the "Washington Consensus", the Higher School of Economics writes
Create VBRR as the bank of "Rosneft" is meaningless, as the name suggests the claimed global financing of regional development, which is clearly beyond the power of "Rosneft", but the power of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation with its accumulated reserves. However, the CBR is part of the international financial oligarchy and tightly controlled from London and Washington, therefore, such a goal set by President Vladimir Putin before the main bank of the country, is not feasible. Even after the appointment of a managed Elvira Nabiullina and administration functions through a mega financial intelligence, as well as the prosecution of HSE staff and RSHE, the CBR can not become a tool to Vladimir Putin to conduct their own financial policies. For this we need to change the existing laws and the Constitution of the Russian Federation, which do not allow the Liberals, it which can initiate the removal of the president from power by a majority in the State Duma. Only one thing — create your own bank and enable them to finance their own projects, gradually squeezing the Central Bank of Russia. Attraction for this Dominique Strauss-Kahn and a lot and a little. Lot because the bank has not yet found the strength and not become an international financial institution, a little, because the figure for the European operations of Dominique Strauss-Kahn is not suitable.
Here we come to the main point, for what, and was brought Dominique Strauss — Kahn: to create a large Eurasian Union and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD). Abbreviation retained, but the meaning is changing dramatically, and now you can not only evict the Central Bank of Russia, together with its inhabitants, but to carry out their own emissions through an international bank. It remains to fill its shareholders and this may be the most important of all, Vladimir Putin. November 18, 2011 in the Kremlin Presidents Alexander Lukashenko of Belarus,
the Russian Federation Dmitry Medvedev and Nursultan Nazarbayev of Kazakhstan signed an agreement on the establishment of the Eurasian Economic Commission, or the Eurasian Union. Medvedev said at the signing:
The formation of supranational central in relation to the body we exclude the domination of one country over another. This equitable Commission.
Kazakhstan’s President Nursultan Nazarbayev said:
First, we need to prove to myself profitability and equality of our economic space. After this, you must raise the question of a single currency. But I believe that no national currency, including such powerful as the ruble is not suitable for this role. This should be a different name, there must be another currency.
So whose currency should be the regulator of economic relations in the Eurasian Union? Of course China, which could be another shareholder VBRR not only because it has the largest GDP and gold — currency reserves, but in the face of shrinking demand in the U.S. and Europe, the traditional buyers of Chinese products, China needs new markets beyond the control of London and Washington. BRICS in this plan is no longer of any interest to Moscow nor Beijing, as, apart from the development of the City of London Rothschild and Goldman Sachs, the organization of cooperation is becoming a burden for Russia and China, and did not find for themselves worthy partners in the face of Brazil , India and South Africa in particular, showed the world their opposition to Vladimir Putin. Agreement between Putin and Xi Jinping in Moscow have launched a new alliance between the two countries, it is possible to be capable of not only the new global unit on the Eurasian continent, but also of economic organization, which includes many countries in Europe and Asia. These could be: Italy, Greece, Syria, Iran, Pakistan, Belarus, Russia, China, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Armenia, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. A balanced policy of China and Russia in the Middle East, the defense of sovereign B.Aliyev Assad regime, the condemnation of the Israeli military and the aid to Egypt, the Eurasian Union will make a truly global organization that is able to squeeze out of the Middle East axis of evil: London — Washington, creating an international Islamic Center, New Babylon in Tehran, which may mark the center of the Muslim world in the Middle East. Falling oil sales by Qatar and Saudi Arabia, as well as their internal instability could be a resolution of the many conflicts between Sunnis and Shiites for the creation of the Islamic Ummah.
And the organizer of these global changes in the Middle East could become Putin’s Eurasian Union — Xi Jinping, your bank for Reconstruction and Development! Such a task on the shoulder Dominique Strauss-Kahn and the political center of Rome, where already pulled together the threads of the New World Order to replace the banking community, who made his fortune in the financial transactions that made the whole world hostage. The fall of the financial system monetarist capitalism, ably guided by some circles in Europe and the U.S., to try to speed up the change in global politics will necessarily lead to the emergence of a new social — political concept that Dominique Strauss-Kahn declared in 2011: "The benefits of economic growth should be widely distributed, and not simply assigned a handful of privileged people. " This principle is the basis of the concept of social Vladimir Putin, as reflected in his election papers. In the context of the above, the creation of the Eurasian Union and Bank does not bode well for the Russian liberals and their overseas inspirers. We note a few points that could be a gravestone of liberalism in Russia:
- Replacing CBR IBRD will refuse focused on the UK and the U.S. fiscal policy, the creation of a national monetary system, which allows longer attached to the petrodollar
- With the incorporation of the major European and Asian countries in the Eurasian Union, a new political system, or as not connected with London and Washington, but there is a round table where the first violin playing Russia and China
- After the failure of the European Union to conclude long-term contracts for the supply of energy resources, the interests of Russia fully turning to China, the Middle East and Central Asia, where now you can build your own Eurasian markets
- The conclusion of the Eurasian Union denounces the signing of the WTO, nor the right of trade organizations in the U.S., since the creation of the EU involves the creation of customs and trade unions
- VBRR than direct functions of trade finance and foreign exchange management, can go to the functions of lending to developing countries in the Middle East and Central Asia, thus expanding the geographical markets for the leading countries — members of the Eurasian Union
- Chinese yuan, as the most secured currency, can completely replace the dollar in international payments within the IBRD and the Eurasian Union, which will not only economic but also political achievement of the EU
- In terms of the Eurasian Union, Russia and China can pursue an independent policy in relation to other countries in the region, not looking at the U.S. and the UK, because the EU can create their own military rapid reaction force that will relieve the Eurasian region from the appearance of local conflicts unleashed axis of evil London — Washington.
Such solutions require new politicians and businessmen, and the old liberal camp would have to leave Russia at the mercy of the winner — Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, or to try to enter into a new system of sovereign politics and the economy, where knowledge and skills of liberals can be useful as soon as labor on construction sites Restored Russia. Such plans Vladimir Putin is welcome, as it is seen in them further national course of our state and our nation.
Ipatyev KF (GRU Major Retired)