They save not a country but the whole earth

They save not a country but the whole earth

MICHAEL syringe SCREENPLAY ANIME «First Squad» and the TV series «mediator»

And «First Squad» and «House of wanderers» tell about the times of the USSR What is common in these scenarios, and how they differ? AT "First Squad" I was important was Soviet mythology and the Soviet vision of the world, particularly saturated unique ideology. The «mediator» also has its own myth. but it is another, all mankind. He is not tied to any particular ideology. Anyone can be in this situation before such a choice. And modern man as well. Vector from «First Squad» and «mediator» common enemies come into the house, and the characters they resist. But mythology is completely different.

The characters of the novel Mirer due to time and education were virtually pioneers-heroes, the choice whether or not to give their lives for their homeland, they did not stand. Of course, to give, Modern teenagers do not have such a clear imperative. They have a very different attitude to the country, to himself and to others. Would not that the transfer action now will deprive the product of its ethical component? No way. Actually, the country has nothing to do with it, because of the threat of invasion was universal. It’s just that students in those years was the idea that the Soviet Union still the whole world. In fact, they are not saving the country and the entire Earth. It is ideology. Of course, now these unambiguous rare. In our conditional "partisan" (at some point the city is completely captured, and the children go underground, each is due to some of its causes. Some of conscious choice, someone because of personal relationships, while others may be and because of ideology. There are heroes, subject to the time did not choose a side, and acting under the influence of a thorough

In today’s world, it became clear that almost any ethical model at least has a right to exist. No matter how vicious or aggressive, or conversely peaceful it was. But in many situations, these models are more or less well-off, more or less erroneous. And we’re not trying to denigrate or whitewash heroes. Our task — to show them in different situations, show that. the viewer to understand them first and foremost. This, in our opinion at all a requirement for modern teleromanu: the lack of one-dimensional characters, only good or only bad.

But what about the education of the audience, how to show what is good and what is bad? I think the world has changed. Before the world was much narrower, primarily informational. And the line between good and bad were to determine the course easier. World average Soviet citizen was simple: the USSR — well, what is there beyond the «Iron Curtain» — bad. But it was a very strong simplification primitivization. Now it is clear that there are no bad people, there are bad things, and evaluation of actions depends largely on the situation in which the man was.

That is now the educational moment is not needed? Be sure to need. Just now we bring up another. We call it freedom. Previously, society intercepted a man of the responsibility, he explained that the ethical and what is unethical. Properly explained or not — a separate issue, for example, had a lot of bad public acceptance. And now (which is good), every person has to be defined itself. And this, this freedom, the ability to choose for themselves, and must be taught. Since there is no clear and unambiguous good bad, and there is a huge range of options, dial tones, then it, too, must learn to navigate. We must learn intuitively recognize the good in this spectrum. It is very difficult. I believe that every person of good recognition engine originally laid. Just not everyone can use it.

SQL - 12 | 0,875 сек. | 7.82 МБ