Relations between countries and peoples, as the tasks associated with them, have deep historical roots. Their beginning is the time of formation of the first social-class entities — countries. In the process of translation of the political and economic domination of the inside of the country, the ruling classes and directing attention to what is happening outside. But their invasion into the scope of another country, these classes are inevitably faced with resistance, the cause of which was a discrepancy of interests. Because since then the solution to all the problems associated with international relations, was made with 2 main methods.
The first of them was linked to the achievement of a balance of interests that made it possible in some measure to take into account the interests of other states. Specifically that of the balance of interests became the basis for the conclusion of trade unions and contracts and to a large extent contributed to the development of economic, political, cultural and diplomatic ties between the nations, which in turn brings them closer and forms the system of international relations with measured. Nevertheless, such a balance of interests usually have specific temporal and spatial limits. A minute this balance led to the destruction of international alliances and the replacement of friendly relations came armed conflicts.
Each government will at some point begin to pursue their own interests while ignoring the interests of other countries, which is a prerequisite bloody devastating wars. During each such war opponents have tried as much as possible to undermine the military, human and political resources of each other, thus ensuring the impossibility of the response. In such circumstances, the only means by which to achieve their own interests in the world, it became a military buildup by which foreign and solved all problems. This increase was the second method of solving international problems.
Since ancient times, military force is becoming not only a constant factor in the implementation of international relations, and found support and justification in the writings of many ideologues. In most of their military power was recognized almost the only efficient means achieve their interests and development of the country, which was based on international law. Providing their own interests through military force there were fully applicable, which ultimately led to the sad result: a global history — is, in fact, not a history of the development of peoples, but the story of countless wars.
If we analyze international affairs, one can find nature and essence of the relations between countries and peoples, and the means — to behold, what kind of laws develops one or another government, as part of the system. Each government, international relations being part systems, having a tendency to develop and survival, or forced by other means adapted thereto. So Makar, foreign policy of each country included in the system, depends specifically on it. In other words, the foreign policy of each separately taken country depends not only on the aspirations of the political elite, and the state of international relations.
The very same, this system works because of the desire for self-preservation, resulting in zeal merit balance between states, even in spite of the fact that their interests may have radically different from each other. In addition, the system of international relations has a management team which would coordinate the actions of the structural parts. Because of its balance achieved by the collision of interests of different countries and the actions of the political elite in the international arena.
Each government, seeking to realize their interests, increase the impact of its aggregate power in international affairs, the intensity of which is dependent on the national interests of the state and the most international system. Meanwhile, the strength of the country in the international arena is not equal to the total power, although it is dependent on it. The fact that the foreign power is derived from the aggregate power, which, in fact, determines the ability of the introduction of this force. In addition, it is necessary to take into account the fact that the strength of the country is determined by the intensity of its manifestation, in other words abilities have an effect on the system of international relations at the same or one of the countries that enters into its composition.
The system of international relations not only provides a link between the various states, but at the same time she is the subject of foreign policy. In other words, in the merit of certain specific interests of each government has an impact on it, so Makarov, becoming one of the carriers of force. Eventually contact is a huge huge amount of force, and, usually, the country did not get the results that are expected.
To find the nature of the acts of force or any other country in the system of international relations, it is necessary to find out what structural parts is the total power of the country. For example, it includes allocated financial, scientific, military, social and moral. In its pure form, none of them in the international arena is not shown because it makes sense to read about their fate and tangles. The foreign force in the country consists of economic, political, scientific, technical, moral and ideological and military power. In this case, more enthusiasm is a military force that is the real impact of rich country's military power on the system of international relations, or its structural components (groups of states or individual countries). In all this we must note that the intensity and the degree of implementation of its defined direction and disposition of foreign policy objectives. So Makarov, one could argue that military force is the means of military policy. In general, the policy has its own disposal and other means of Merit purposes, but for the military policy of military force is the main means of their implementation. And with all this military force in all forms will have an impact on other countries by means of armed violence.
The basic form of the acts of military force is a war, a show of force, anger. This is her kind of obvious. But there is still a majestic huge number of methods by which it can covertly influence on world affairs: sales tools, infrastructure development, assisting in the training of military professionals, the construction of military facilities. Despite the abundance of forms and methods, in any case, military power is forcibly temper.
So Makar, bring a certain result all of the above. On the international arena, the strength of each country is determined by several aspects: the ability to persuade, in other words to be able to obtain from other activities aimed at the implementation of self-interest and intimidation. Any of these criteria is at certain levels depending on the level of development of parts of the state power of the country. At the same time, a precise definition of state power does not exist, even in spite of long-standing research scientists and professionals. This is due first to the fact that the concept of force is constantly changing depending on the approach that is used to analyze the system of international relations.
One of the few components which is in any analysis, is the military force. With all this you can not talk about the fact that the Government, which has t
he largest army in the world, by definition, and is the strongest. Indeed, very often the presence of a large army does not lead to the achievement of the government's own interests in the international arena. Brightest examples of this — the period between the world wars, and the "cold war" as countries with bolshennymi armies had to adjust to the policies of others. And a hundred percent rule out military force as unacceptable. Economic characteristics (volume of external trade and the intensity of its growth, the GDP), excluding military might greatly simplify the concept of "national strength." It is more that by focusing only on economic power government fails to reach the level of the region want to or the world in general.
It should also be noted that the time indicated by the introduction of new concepts such as the "moral force", which means the provision of socio-cultural system of the country and its political dynamics of the development impact of other countries. But at the same time, a government that has a "moral force" capable of preventing a crisis or to interfere in areas of conflict that inevitably is connected with the use of military force.
So Makar, military power is not limited to military force. Exactly how to strive to change the function of the army in foreign policy, and at the same time to translate military power in foreign policy on the second plan.
Military force, affecting the development and operation of the system of international relations, can lead to such results, which none of the subjects of this system could not imagine. Because everything should be in moderation, and the state power of the country should not be determined only by the power components.