For that Stalin destroyed — the facts

For that Stalin killed - the facts

For some reason, Democrats do not love Stalin and Stalin in their povinet of all sins? Generally the flow of hatred comes down to massive repression, fear of industrialization and collectivization. But the reason is different and it is obvious: sponsored by the West, the democratic forces have no interest in an economically strong RF and fair social policy in relation to the population. We offer an overview of Stalin's presidency of the Council of Ministers and the likely unfavorable prospects for a capitalist economy based on real economic achievements in facts and figures available to the Soviet Union in the last years of Stalin's rule.

Let's talk about lowering prices, and about where it was taken.
Lower prices, in principle, easily, it needs to reduce labor costs for these products. To reduce costs it is necessary that those who produce the products made it to one more time and labor inherent in the raw materials and energy is saved. It's very simple, but …

Stupid bastard will not be able to do this, lower the cost of labor can only be intelligent, professional people. And if the country under Stalin in the most difficult criteria, but in no time sharply jerked forward, it means that at the designated time, there was a lot of smart people. And it's really true, because Stalin appropriated reason people USSR tremendous value. He was naiumneyshy man, and he was disgusted surrounded by fools, he sought, so that the whole country was smart.

The base for the mind to work — knowledge. Of knowledge about everything. And never so much has been done to provide the people of knowledge for the development of their brains, as under Stalin.

I began to study in the school, three years after Stalin's death, we have been taught nor logic, nor the Constitution of the USSR, but in general, neither the school nor the general regime it has not changed very much. What was relevant in that, in Stalin's school?

Inner conviction of each student, which must be trained to be smart. Trained not to get a certificate, and to obtain knowledge. When we, the kids, the evening left the school building, classrooms, high school filled with adults and even senior citizens — began classes at night school, a school for workers.

Teachers were given the knowledge and sought their understanding, not memorization. If the student is on stupidity or laziness not mastered the example program (at least in one subject), it was left in the same class on the second, on the third year. 2-3 until the seventh grade repetition in any class was commonplace. After seven lots of guys (repeaters certainly) going to the factory school and began to study, if desired, in the 8th grade is the night school. Ten-day school ended up really capable or hardworking guys. All the teachers were mugs in their subjects, in all zeal was to teach kids to find knowledge without the help of others, to teach thinking.

Such a graphic instance. The richest on the book fund we had a regional children's library, in addition, it can be (to defend the place) to choose the book without the help of others. But there was such order. Allowed to take three books, one of their own choosing what you want, one on the Ukrainian language, regardless of what school you learn — Russian or Ukrainian, and one non-fiction. No substitutions are not allowed: you do not want to take on Ukrainian and non-fiction — take one. Standing in line for a book was sad. So, almost against his will, to invest in the knowledge of kids and just breathtakingly much in those years it was written for kids in an accessible way about everything from how to live ants to the workings of the universe.

In the old movie "Carnival Night" is one of the jokes is based on the fact that on New Year's Eve invited lecturer at a lecture titled "Is There Life on Mars?" For New Year's Eve is a bust, it's funny, but it's an example of what kind of activities, not counting the movies and jazz, teasers of the time.

Debates, discussions were commonplace and virtually no topics on which it was impossible to argue, was not of those whose thought and expression can not be discussed. Do not open a discussion appropriateness of Russian power — the power of working people, everything else could open a discussion.

I already wrote that the magazine "Problems of Philosophy" intensively invited everyone to discuss mistakes and shortcomings of the theory of relativity. Under Khrushchev, the USSR Academy forbade her discussion, and physics has reached a profound impasse, for 50 years without giving people anything, except no one suitable and wildly expensive research.

Under Khrushchev, and the same happened with genetics. After the discovery of DNA in 1955, when it became clear rectitude Lysenko genetics produced shulersky downright fraud — they have begun to argue that the DNA regions these are the unfortunate individual particles of a diameter of 0.02-0.06 micron (genes), but intellectual state of today's population is such that it is no longer interesting. After all, fun. Microbiologists, geneticists are called nerds, spend billions of dollars and make a "genetic" copy of the sheep. And those who pay so much money for feral experiments can not think of a common idea to ask: why the money spent on? After breeding sheep for half a minute will give you a sheep still the best than this clone. 60 years of "genetics" wasting billion on their studies, and those who really improves the plants and animals (breeders), a chorus and say that they, these "genetic" studies have never been the gift neobhodimy.265

Read "The economic difficulties of socialism in the USSR." In this book the ordinary economists are not afraid to criticize Stalin, and Stalin patiently explain their misconceptions. Namely, that it is impossible to impose the farmers care about the technology. The technique should not focus on the collective farms, and on the machine and tractor stations (MTS) in specialist mechanics who, at the request of experts on crop (farmers) of cultivated land and the collection will be removed and if so then how and when farmers ukazhut.266 Incidentally, while Lysenko tried to make every farmer breeder farmers do creative work. In the collective farms were built huts agribusiness, farmers were taught techniques of breeding — pollination, grafting, working with varieties.

And specifically creative work 10-s of millions of workers productive labor has permitted the Soviet Union to stand up so quickly has permitted greatly outpace the West.

Zeal for knowledge, creativity of the Russian people had a very long time. When in 1985, Gorbachev adopted officially in power, Jews, Jews' interests in the population began to prevail in front of a human. The circulation of scientific and popular publications began to fall, and the yellowish jew press of the "Arguments and Facts" or "Spark", began to grow. Yet even in 1989-1990. on the magazine "Science and Life" are signed by some 2.3 million people, "Technology — Youth" — 1.5 million, "Radio" — 1.5 million, "Young technician" — 1.7 million " Young Naturalist "- 2.9 million Even such a magazine as the" Model Construction ", had a circulation of 1.7 mln.265 Only zhidovstve final victory in 1991 was blighted by these publications, the overwhelming majority of the population of the Russian Federation all, not counting zhrachki and fucking, did not become motivate, motivate even finis
hed that one and the other, and they became engaged less than in the USSR.

Syzveka, when work ended, the Russian people, not knowing what to do, drinking. Stalin did not fight with vodka, he fought for the people's free time.

Amateur sport was developed very specifically and amateur. Every company and institution had sports teams and athletes from their own employees. More or less large companies were required to have and maintain stadiums. Played all and in all. And colleagues wholeheartedly rooting for their own peers. Teams consist of athletes of all ages. That's close to me such an example: the first director of the Aktobe ferroalloys plant, which was built during World War II, he played in the original soccer team almost until retirement, and his son (my friend), working smelter, acted in equestrian competitions. My older brother raced yachts and since he was 8 years older than me and I was a nanny, I have to stay young in mind the roar of sails and romantic words like "tack", "backstay", "jibe".

More have been developed and all kinds of amateur. If stadiums or water stations are not required from each company (it's all the same is not cheap), the club, if not a palace of culture, had to have it. And in these clubs were created by local workers and dramatic theater, and vocal ensembles, and many other clubs, from sewing to ballroom dancing. Each company had its own orchestra, very little wind.

At the moment not enough people even of the adults will be able to explain why in all the towns of the USSR of Stalin's time were parks. But first they were intended for mass recreation. They certainly must have been reading and games rooms (chess, billiards), beer and ice cream, a dance pavilion and summer theaters. Winter — skating rinks. And Happy holiday and the weekend, dressed up, all the region flocked to parks and rest in mass society. After Stalin's power began to be afraid of crowds that is not surrounded by police or troops. Parks degenerated.

In those years, the police occasionally strike the eye because of the small number of its own and even policemen on patrol were mostly without guns — their weapon was a form. About batons the police are not out of the question directly to Gorbachev, as under Stalin, I think, for one idea that Russian man can hit someone with a stick, could drop as a malicious anti-Soviet. Naturally, rumors about drugs and did not have anybody, but for the idea that you can legally make a living as prostitutes could beat themselves … and b. They were, naturally, not only in an intellectual community, but the number and position of a lover of his own embarrassed.

To celebrate, and on this topic, I will say that while Russian people as a friend took a tour of French artist J. Montana, and this, I'm sorry, he bought a goat in Russian stores are the lower lingerie and made of him in Paris show — say, look how miserable this socialism. It must be said that a French goat answered themselves, give them the tribute. And I would add that at the time was not up to the frilly lingerie, required only that it is in season and missing the warm air. In addition, the Russian guys excited no underwear, and that under it. Russian peasants to erect any incentives in the form of whimsical patterns are not required. Do not suppose the French …

And now the 10 of millions of workers, intelligent and curious, courageous and hard-working, and Stalin were men. He lived for them, they beheld and appreciated. And it is them and only them and appreciated. And all zhidovnyu Soviet forced laborers to appreciate and serve them.

Jews are not valued, and people

Take a small statistical sample. Once on the second-hand market, bought a sheet set 14-room magazine "Spark" for the end of 1952, some time later collected 14 rooms of the same magazine over the summer and autumn of 1999 g.268 came out two samples: Stalin's "Spark" and Yid. Consider all articles troublesome, but since it has always been an illustrated edition, I counted and classified photos and pictures in these magazines, they turned in 14 rooms approximately tysche and in 1952 and 1999 but in the compilation of photos seen a significant difference.

We are told that at that time all editions without annoying praised Stalin and without annoying printed only his photos. Yes, indeed, quite a lot of photos of Stalin. However, it should be noted that during this period Congress passed the fighters for peace, XIX Congress of the CPSU (b), celebrated the 35th anniversary of the October Revolution and the 30th anniversary of the USSR. In addition, a contract was signed on friendship with China. If you take into account not only the photos (and pictures) with Stalin, and photos of other political figures, and refer to it photos of politicians, they, along with photos of the Romanian, Chinese, Vietnamese and other figures in 14 issues of "Spark" for 1952 . total 28 pcs., or about 1 photo policy for the 36 other photos and drawings.

In 14 issues of "Spark" for 1999, but Russian politicians lit up their snouts 161 times! With all of this no significant political developments in the country at that time did not happen. Any sixth photo — it's either double Yeltsin or Zhirinovsky or Primakov, or on the thin end Khakamada. Most politicians in the "sparks" is a "cultural intelligence", ie Jews, smogshie "settle" with these "politicians". This is the writers and journalists — 56 pcs., But priemuschestvenno comedians — actors, musicians, comedians, with a small addition of athletes — all those who amuses the audience. Photos of 211 pieces. and together with the writers — 267 pcs., ie every fourth photo in the room — it face some comedian.

In Stalin's "sparks" of too much: entertainers and athletes — 120 writers — 12 journalists — no. If we talk about the writers, it's pictures and photos for anniversary articles about Radishcheva Odoevsky, Mamin-Siberian, Emile Zola and Hungarian poet of the last century, Andre Adi. Photo Russian President Peace Committee of the writer Tikhonov and small photo creators of the stories (D. Aldridge, D. Lindsay, etc.). Photos of artists in every sense of the word no, there they create images in the reviews of the films and performances. Photos only athletes — more than fifty photos of the world champions.

In the "sparks" in 1999 is not so: it is the writers and comedians were not taken in the course of their own labor, and without annoying teach readers how to live and how to be aware of what is happening — there are oracles and the standard mental strength. But the really smart people — engineers, scientists, workers, doctors — a 14-room "Spark" in 1999, one might say, is not presented. To somehow increment the number, I added here with painters and composers, and photos of all production processes, and yet these photos gained only 58 pcs. (This is in conjunction with a photo of schoolchildren with birdhouses — maybe they amassed them). In other words, there is a 16 bit one photo, which shows or people who all this feeds a Jewish mob, water them, and warm clothes, or at least some of the processes of labor.

In "Ogonek" 1952 photo of people, labor, processes and outcomes of work covered in each of the third photo! Their 311 pcs.

That's the significant difference. Under Stalin in the "sparks" were famous people of productive work — smart people that realize themselves in creativity. When zhidah in the "sparks" are famous Jews, "to arrange" to entertain people with the means.

Fascinating cover. In Stalin's "sparks" on the cover depicted: 1 coat of arms of the USSR, 1 photo cruiser "Aurora", one view of the Kremlin, 1 photo solemn demonstration, 1 photo of Mao Zedong and 9 pictures of working people. In a Jewish "sparks" on the cover of a 6-rooms
various collages and pictures do not mean anything, in one room journalist and a 7-rooms again comedians.

Each of the 14 rooms of the "Spark" in 1999 on the second page of the cover placed some photos of an old household items and memoirs of years gone by with some morals. Moralizovali: one writer, one journalist, one astronaut (buckwheat) and 11 comedians — from comedian Shifrin to some midget Fedorov.

In Stalin's "Ogonek" in the number 52 before the New Year interviewed with ideas about life in 13 patients. Since this is indeed People, not the Jews, and they should remember. They were: Meliton Kantariya — Hero of the Russian Union hoisted the banner of victory in the Reichstag for 1952 — sinker mine, Alexei Voronov — Hero of Socialist Labor, agronomist Lina Passard — 17 years, nanayka, student school teacher, Pasha Angelina — Hero of Socialist Labor, Brigadier tractor brigade, I. Eyhveld — President of the Academy of the Estonian SSR V. Mamontov — steelworker, a decorated, T. Kirgilova — secondary school teacher, Altai, S. Vishtak — twice Hero of Socialist Labor, the collective farm chairman, S. Chabanova — Honoured Doctor of the Russian Federation by Alexander Ivanov — Head of the original school, Sakhalin, M. Golubkova — bard from Archangel; G. Silyutin — Head of department; F. Queens — noble miner.

That's typical. Under Stalin held view comedians "for life" were not interested. Such an impression that all the servants and lackeys, ready with his pen and mug to satisfy at least some owner then knew their place. It is named, of course, do not like it, but it's not bothering anyone — it is a place for themselves elected.

Stalin's breakthrough

These are the people listed above in the "sparks" in 1952, and provided a sharp increase in production in the USSR and their sharp depreciation. This enabled the Government of the USSR once a year, with the inexorability of the arrival of spring, cut prices. As a result, a unique process occurred in the history of economics and money — ruble from year to year without annoying rose in price. Not spent on this year's ruble in the future, the products can be purchased much more. Pensions, scholarships, salaries from year to year became more and more significant. And it was comprehended by Stalin and introduced them (though rapidly by eno *** Khrushchev).

Because the truth of history is contained in the accounting books, then I will give extracts from these books, chosen economist Sharapova.

Let's take a look at the same price since then.

The lowest since 1921-1922,. quality of life in the Soviet Union was in 1946-1947.

What are the prices were in 1947 (the year of the exchange rate reform) on the principal food products and people's use and what they have in 6 years (in year Stalin's death), it is clear from the table below.

1947 1953

Pure white bread and bakery products (1 kg) 5 rubles. 50 kopecks. 3 rubles.
Dark bread 3 rubles. 1 rub.
Meat (beef) s0 rub. 12 rubles. 50 kopecks.
Fish (perch) 12 rubles. 7 rub. 10 kopecks.
Milk (1 liter) of 3 rubles. 2 rubles. 24 kopecks.
Butter (kg) 64 rubles. 27 rub.80 cop.
Eggs (dozen) 12 rubles. 8 rubles. 35 kopecks.
Refined sugar (kg) 15 rubles. 9 rubles. 40 kopecks.
Vegetable oil 30 rubles. 17 rubles.
Bank of crabs 20 rubles. 4 rubles. 30 kopecks.

Shoes (pair, on average) 260 rub. 188 rubles. 50kop
Chintz (1 m) 10rub. 10 kopecks. 6 rubles. 10 kopecks.
Woolen cloth (1 m) 269 rub. 113 rubles.
Silk is a natural 137 rubles. 100 rubles.

The price of the food basket for the month
1130 rubles. 510 rubles.

It should be understood that the food basket, developed in 1950 by Russian scientists, was substantially "heavier" the one offered in 1994, "scientists Democrats" is given in the table below to compare.

The one-year rate of consumption in the year

1953 1994

Bread (pure white and dark)
183 — 102

114 — 105

Vegetables and melons
141 — 110

91 — 41

Meat and Meat Products
63 — 50

21 — 15

Milk (L)
365 — 246

Eggs (pc)
350 — 140

Prices of farm markets in the years 1953-55. is not much different from retail municipalities. Those consumers who did not want to stand in line for a cheap products, with a small overpayment could purchase products at farm market (and from time to time market products were cheaper), and the food quality is not tainted with nitrates, not frozen, and the freshest.

That was the picture right before the fateful decisions NS Khrushchev on the reduction of homestead land from farmers in 1959, but then increased and at the collective farm markets prices do not exceed the municipal more than 1.5-2 times.

Salary workers in 1953 ranged from 800 to 3,000 rubles and above that says that there is no while leveling.

Miners and metallurgists Stakhanovite received while up to 8000 rubles. for the month.

Salary young professional engineer was 900-1000 rubles, Senior Engineer — 1200-1300 rubles.

Secretary of the Communist Party received 1,500 rubles per month.

Federal Minister for salary does not exceed 5,000 rubles, salaries of professors and academicians were higher, often exceeding 10,000 rubles.

The purchasing power of 10 rubles for food and goods consumption was higher than the possibility of purchasing the South American dollar by 1.58 times (and this despite the fact, free housing, treatment, rest homes, etc.).

From 1928 to 1955. increase the use of mass production in the USSR was 595% based on per capita.

The real income of workers increased in 1913 compared to 4 times, and with the elimination of unemployment and reducing the length of the working day or — 5 times.

At the same time, in the capital of the price level of important foods in 1952 as a percentage of prices in 1947 increased significantly.

Percentage rise in price

U.S. — UK — France

128% -190% -208%

126% — 135% — 188%

104% — 225% — 192%

106% — 233% — 370%

And if the Stalinist planning system has been maintained and even improved it is appropriate, and IV Stalin was aware of the need to improve the socialist economy (indeed, the 1952 appeared his work "Economic problems of socialism in the USSR"), if at the first place was tasked forthcoming increase in the standard of living of the people (in 1953 no obstacles to this was not), we have by 1970 could be in the top three states with the highest standard of living.

Here is this sustained improvement of life of the Russian people scare the current Democrats duped their people. But says nothing about the fact that Russian government has introduced the world's first 8-hour working day, guaranteed free education and health care, nearly free housing, retirement, paid vacation, most of the world a cheap public transport. USSR was the first in Europe after the war overturned the card system.

The successes of the USSR did not bother to joke capitalist countries and the United States first.

In the September issue of the journal "Neyshnl business" of 1953 GV article Herbert Harris' Russian overtake us … "it was noted that the Soviet Union in terms of economic power ahead of any country, and that at the current time, the growth rate in the USSR 2-3 higher than in the U.S..

U.S. presidential candidate Stevenson assessed the situation so makarom that if the rate of production in the Stalinist Russian Federation continue, by 1970 the volume of Russian production will exceed 4.3 times the South American. And if that happens, the impact of capital (and the first for the United States) will be very little harsh.

A Hearst, the ruler of the American press, after a visit to the USSR, and even suggested the cr
eation of the constant sought Planning Board in the United States.

Capital was well aware that the yearly increase in the standard of living of the Russian people is the most powerful argument in favor of the advantages of socialism over capitalism.

Capital but lucky: died (was quickly put to death), Stalin.

Stalin. The yearly decline in prices

Under Stalin, for the first time in history, was created crisis-free economy is a big country.

In 1948, the volume of industrial production in USSR not only headed for the pre-war level, and stole it. The industry has been restored to only a small strings. After the war, the country plainclothes took 6 years to return the economy. Bolshennye loss into a sublime Russian war with what is not comparable. Yet, now the industry recovery was made almost two and a half years.

In the end, heroic labor of the workers and tireless organizational activities of the party of the fourth five-year plan in the industry was carried out in four years and three months. Over the years it has been restored, built and put into operation more than 6 thousand industrial companies, that is almost the same as in the first and second five-year plan to put together. Gross production of industry in 1950 exceeded the prewar level by 73 percent, while the plan was supposed excess of 48 percent. Exceeded the pre-war level of pig iron by 29 percent, steel — by 49 percent, coal production — by 57 percent, oil — by 22 percent. Labour productivity in industry increased by 37 percent.

Compared with 1940, in 1950 the gross social product of the USSR increased by 161%, produced national income — by 164%. Create the means of production in 1950 grown — by 204%, animal products — 104%, commissioning of fixed assets — 192%, serious investment — 196%, the number of workers and employees — by 119%, labor productivity in the industry — na145 %, in agriculture — 100%, at the railway transport — by 110%, in construction — by 125%. (HX USSR for 60 years. C.14. M. 1977) Stalin's economic growth and lasted after the death of Stalin.

In 1949, collective farms, MTS and state farms have tractors and agricultural machinery in the two and a half times more than in 1940. Turned electrification of collective farms, state farms and MTS. Supplemented the number of cattle western regions due east.

At the end of 1952 saw the publication of the latest work of Stalin "The economic difficulties of socialism in the USSR." In this book, Stalin, based on the teachings of Marxism — Leninism opened the aim of capitalist production: "The purpose of capitalist production — extraction of profits. As for usage, it is necessary to capitalism only in so far as it provides a puzzle profiting. Outside of this issue of the consumption of capitalism loses meaning. A man with his intakes disappears from view. " Then he opened the main issues of the political economy of socialism, of great importance, for the practice of the country and the Russian Communist Party. With an emphasis on the works of Marx, Engels, Lenin, summing up the experience of the Global history, experience of building socialism in the USSR, Stalin defined the basic economic law of socialism — "Ensuring the greatest gratification is constantly growing material and cultural needs of society — is the aim of socialist production , continuous growth and improvement of socialist production on the basis of the highest art, — a tool merit purpose. (Stalin. Economic problems of socialism in the USSR. Pp. 76, 78, Moscow, 1952)

This law was the basis of all communist parties, building socialism and even the governments of some capitalist countries seeking to mitigate the effects of the economic crisis. This will be discussed further.

Stalin yearly decline in prices and the increase in wages is — nothing else, as an increase in investment and office workers, seniors and students across a large country in its economy. For example, if a citizen of increasing purchasing power, he spends more money on food and, by this means investing in agriculture, the food industry, increasing their sales and, of course, the profits of these industries.

If he increased revenue, it spends more money on odezhku and shoes — helps light industry. If he has enough money, he builds for himself a new or improve existing housing, acquire building materials, makes it more profitable branch of the construction materials and the structure of organizations, and so on.

If a citizen of the funds remain on the desired purchase or there is a need to raise funds for a major purchase, he invested in a savings bank and savings bank evolved from this. The investor receives interest, and the bank guarantee him safety of the funds. The economy ensured the continued development of all sectors of the economy without crises.

Postwar yearly reduction of retail prices

Just two and a half years after the end of stateliness Russian war, in December 1947, the USSR was carried out currency reform, canceled cards for food and industrial products, introduced a common municipal reduced the retail prices of products of mass consumption.

In this, the first step of lowering prices cheaper products of mass consumption by only one state retail trade during the year amounted to 57 billion rubles. Besides lower prices on the collective farm and cooperative market prices were reduced by $ 29 billion. Total loss of the budget in 1947 to reduce retail prices accounted for 86 billion rubles.

This amount was himself unspotted loss for the municipal budget, which was covered by the growth of labor productivity, increased production of mass consumption and lower production costs.

March 1, 1949 ended the second step of lowering the prices of products of mass consumption in state trade amounting to 48 billion rubles, in addition, in a cooperative and collective-farm trade — the sum of 23 billion rubles.

Resolution of the Council of Ministers of the USSR and the Central Committee of the CPSU (b) stated that "as a result of new lower prices will rise again significantly the purchasing power of the ruble exchange rate and improved in comparison with the rate of foreign currencies will rise again real wages of workers and intellectuals and again significantly reduce the cost of farmers for the purchase of manufactured goods. "

"In this event, the Bolshevik Party and the Russian government with the power of the latest apparent majestic care workers about their welfare, the growth of wealth and culture," it was reported in the editorial of the newspaper "Pravda" March 1, 1949.

Designated CM Resolution of the USSR and the CPSU (b) the prices were reduced in the following amounts:

Bread, flour and bakery products, cereals and pasta, meat and meat products, fish and rybotovary, butter and ghee, wool and silk fabrics, fur, metal-ware and household appliances, cameras, binoculars, and a number of other products — by 10 %;
coats, suits, dresses and other garments of wool fabrics — by 12%;
dresses, shirts, blouses and other garments of silk fabrics, footwear, headgear — 15%;
cheese and cheese, perfumes, hardware and saddlery, personal sewing some clothes and utensils and appliances made of plastic, and the stories are great, radios, pianos, accordions, button accordions, gramophone records, jewelry, typewriters — by 20%;
Teleki, vodka — 25%;
salt, cement, phonographs, clocks, hay — 30%.

The same Decree prices were reduced accordingly: in restaurants, cafeterias, tea rooms and other public catering enterprises. (The newspaper "Pravda", March 1, 1949)

Across the country, the enterprises held meetings, rallies, which had been brought to migrant Resolution "On a brand new lowered prices …"

Decrease in retail prices in the Soviet Union, especially after the Russian war majestically, during Stalin's lifetime, was carried out once a year. First postwar five-year plan for the restoration and
development of the national economy of the USSR was fulfilled ahead of schedule — for four years and three months. Significantly grown the creation of grain, meat, oil, cotton, linen and wool.

Government revenue in the last year, five-year plan has grown, compared with 1940, by 64% over the last year — by 12%. An editorial of the newspaper "Pravda" for the April 1, 1952 noted: "Comrade Stalin teaches that the essential features of the basic economic law of socialism is to ensure the greatest gratification is constantly growing material and cultural needs of society by continuous growth and improvement of socialist production on the basis of the highest technology" .

This Stalinist policy has provided the economy of the USSR without crises in decades.

On April 1, 1952, on the basis of a massive rise in industry and agriculture has been made to the fifth post-war decline in prices for a total of 53 billion rubles, which caused general rejoicing of the population.

How many were high rates of growth of the industry in the years of Stalin's five-year plans they say the following data: "Produced government revenue in 1950, compared with 1913 increased by 8.8 times, all products are the industry — by 13 times, the creation of the means of production (group A) — 27 times the performance of public work — in 8.4 times. " (National Economy of the USSR for 60 years. C.12. M. 1977)

Once a year, increased wages for all categories of employees, increased pension and scholarship. With the simultaneous build-up of production decline in prices gave a tangible increase in the standard of living of the population.

After the death of Stalin, and even after the conviction of the cult of his personality, a policy of constant increase in wages, prices remained constant.

With the termination of lower retail prices began to fall and the rate of growth of national income. In the years 1980-85 he was in an average year, only 3%. HHU11 Party Congress put the puzzle to increase the rate of growth of national income in the years 1986-90 to 5% on average per year. (Materials HHU11 Party Congress. S. 228, M. 1987) Recall that in the Stalinist period, the rate of growth of national income amounted to 9.12% per year.

Like this post? Please share to your friends: