Interesting archaeological finds

Researchers are still using various arguments, trying to explain the meaning of this figure predmeta.Eta was found in the ritual complex warehouse near Saratov.

And this from the Easter Island.

Are you intrigued?

Findings in Plochnike

It was believed that the copper metallurgy originated in Asia Minor, but artifacts from Plochnika (Serbia) for eight centuries older. That's what tells Kompyulenta about this:
Serbia has discovered copper implements, whose age is estimated at 7.5 thousand years. If this is a sensational discovery is recognized by the international scientific community, the beginning of human use of the metal will have to push back in time.

Axes, hammers, hooks and needles were found in Plochnike, 200 km south of Belgrade. They are about eight hundred years older than the oldest copper products. "This is amazing," — that's all I could squeeze out Professor University of Tübingen (Germany) Ernst Pernichka, personally visited the excavations.

Until now it was thought that the copper metallurgy (from mining and milling to smelting) originated in Asia Minor, from which it spread to the Old World. Plochnik indicates at least that the development of new technology was conducted independently in different places. Close — in modern copper mines in Bor and Majdanpek — were found primitive furnaces. Perhaps the Copper Age started here.

Settlement existed for about eight centuries. Then, about 70 centuries ago, it was burned, and his unknown inhabitants fled in an unknown direction. Plochnik occupies about 120 hectares. His excavations are far from complete. Studied so far only three houses. The largest of these has an area of 40 square meters. m

What led to the fire is unknown. Traces of the attack has not been found. Why were there so many brass instruments, as they were made — the answer to these questions is also still pending.

There are also a few statues and ornaments. One of the figures shows a woman in a "mini-skirt", the rest are in the long and wide dress.

Know the results of the excavation of mass graves, for example, and Vlasats Lepenski Vir, about which the wiki says:
Anthropologically population Lepenski Vir was Cro-Magnon, later showing signs gratsializatsii related, apparently, to the influx of people from the south of the Mediterranean Europe. In the upper layer Lepenski Vir unearthed Neolithic Starcevo-krishskoy culture of southern origin, the population of which belonged to the Mediterranean anthropological type.

What is a pop kromanoidnogo appearance?
T.I.Alekseeva give an answer when going population in Central Russia in the same period:
This population is definitely Caucasian appearance, with a strong protruding nose and sharply modeled face of zigomaksillyarnogo angle. Outside … Eastern European counterparts he found in Mesolithic Scandinavia, the Czech Republic (burial site Lepenski Vir), Yugoslavia (burial Vlasats). The similarity in the symptoms … is so large that there is no doubt the carriers of genetic relationships of Caucasoid, somewhat archaic type, widespread in Europe and even beyond.

VPAlekseev the skulls from burial Vlasats (Yugoslavia), showed that the combination of a flattened lobnoglaznichnogo department with considerable profiling of the facial part in the middle is typical for them.

So. These copper products, and traces in Serbia, the Czech Republic, Scandinavia, Russia left the same population kromanoidnoe archaic appearance.

modern representative

As a result of Alekseeva analysis revealed that the anthropological image of the indigenous population is almost completely inherit the modern Russian central and northern regions.
Already in its stead comes from Asia Minor population, which at the moment does not use the metal, and polished stone tools.
More information and a summary on the subject appear in the record "Finno-Ugric a Russian?" Http://drfaust-spb.livejournal.com/77993.html

It turns out that the Vinca culture, to which these findings, and which yielded much, including the Greeks, in cultural terms, was the forerunner of the Corded Ware culture, which is considered to come from the Germans, Balts and Slavs.

Then everything falls into place:
— Burning settlements in Plochnike and Arkaim.
— Burial in plochnike (on the side) — as well as in the Andronovo culture
— All of these oddities in the etymology of the Greek and Latin words humor, satire, theater, poetry, circus, are perfectly understood by the Russian language.
-And compare the old era (since the creation of the world), by which the year 7518, and the age of the Vinca culture.

A good example for this topic led G.B.Zdanovich. He CSU students took part in excavations in Greece, the first they have unearthed a layer associated with Greek history, and found the toilet like "toilet", and then deep into layers of pre-Greek period (roughly a thousand years), almost in the same place they are also a toilet, but with ceramics.

Mastered the script for nearly two millennia before the Sumerians, and three or four before the Greeks:

Symbols dating from the oldest period of Vin? A culture (6th-5th millennia
BC)

Common symbols used throughout the Vin? A period

Other Vin? A symbols

Third column — the Phoenician alphabet letters, the 1st century BC;
4th column — the notches of Zharkutana, 1st century BC;
5th column — Etruscan alphabet letters, the 1st century BC;
6th column — writing letters of Vinca, 5th century BC
http://my.mail.ru/community/history … 6EF3943817.html

China (for completeness Katina)
Image cuts from sites Banpo, Tszyanchzhay, Linkou, Yantou, Ulou, Signa, Litszyagou. 4.770 BC

Image cuts from sites Banshan, Machanyan and Matszyavan. 2.623-2.416 years. BC

The Chinese do not read znachki.Hotya considered the beginning of Chinese writing.
Indo-China: http://www.infox.ru/science/past/20 … t_cemetry.phtml

http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/% D0% A2 …% BC% D0% B8% D0% B8

If it was an accident, then how to explain this:
http://garshin.ru/linguistics/scripts/rongo/index.html
Kohala rongorongo — "talking boards" Easter Island

and now:

Stone tablet (presumably marble) was found in the village. Kamennomostsky Maikop district rep. Adygea.
http://garshin.ru/linguistics/scrip … n-writings.html

Science in the USSR was really a science. Honor is writing the Great Soviet Encyclopedia,-dtsat years ago, about the Slavs:

http://slovari.yandex.ru/славяне/БСЭ/Славяне/

And a little more.
Difficulties docking archaeological evidence and DNA genealogy may be in the fact that these disciplines operate with different features. In archeology, a "chain drive" material and cultural features, which archaeologists often (or even usually) is not associated with migration, the movement of people. As noted by Anthony (Anthony, 2007), each student in archeology 1960 study under the sign of the slogan "pots — not people," and the notion of migration has practically disappeared from the archeology from the 1970-1980s. In DNA genealogy — is migration trends, regions and times. Therefore, from the point of view of (Russian) Archaeology "Eurasian Indo-European continuum" looks like culture, and it does not migrate, and "chain transmission of cultural traits," along with the language. And archaeologists have noted that in anthropological terms, this chain is almost uniform.

But this approach in terms of DNA genealogy fundamentally defective. Here archaeologists mixed, confused two counter flow of migration of two kinds — tyurkskoyazychnogo R1b from east to west, and arieyazychnogo, "Proto-Indo-European» R1a from west to east. Anthropology of these two streams is really close or almost the same, because they are two related kinds, both Caucasians, both formed from the same kind of R1. Here archaeologists and it turns out that the same kind of culture, tyurkskoyazychnogo R1b, from Khvalynsk, Sredny and drevneyamnoy continue Catacomb culture, with the general movement to the west, all of a sudden jump to the "Proto-Indo-European" and Sintashta Andronovo culture, formed by movement of future Aryan (haplogroup R1a1) to the east.

In other words, there was no place some "chain transmission of cultural traits" without migration, ie migration. This is evidenced by the discovery of haplogroup R1a1 in excavations in Germany dating to 4600 years ago, and the Andronovo culture in southern Siberia, dating to 3800-3400 years ago, the same haplogroup (and the same haplotype) west of the Urals, the Russian Plain , dating to 4,800 years ago, and the same haplogroup (and the same haplotypes) in India and Iran, and the dating of the Russian Plain, only 800-1000 years later. These were precisely the migration, not simply disembodied 'transmission of cultural traits. "

Like this post? Please share to your friends: