In January 2010, I prepared for delivery to the publisher a new monograph, "Rune-stone-age tales of Russia", which brought together his articles on writing mainly in the Paleolithic, and, in addition, made a lot of new deciphering. The result was a solid material. On this basis, I could make a number of important generalizations as sections "Conclusions" and "Conclusion", which I suggest to readers in a separate article.
The above material can make a lot of important conclusions.
The first conclusion. It consists in the fact that, as expected, the writing was not limited to the Neolithic, that modern science is still in question (although there may be some pre-written in the form Letterlike characters), but during the Paleolithic period, which, of course, is a huge step forward in the understanding of the ancient culture of our ancestors.
The consequence of this finding should be a complete review of the whole concept of the ancient humanity as alleged unwritten and therefore not worthy of attention.
The second conclusion. It lies in the finding that in the Paleolithic, even in the lower, there is no trace of what was written was formed.
It existed at approximately the same level, not only in the Paleolithic, but for a few hundred thousand years before him, in the Pleistocene, at least 2 million years ago — this study says eoliths.
But on eoliths no trace of what had just occurred writing, so we can assume its existence in earlier times. In what — very difficult to say.
But this means that all the periods of the Paleolithic, studied archeology and history, mankind the art of writing, so that unwritten period of human history has been. Or, in other words, there was the prehistoric period.
The third conclusion. This implies that archeology in its present form can not be considered the basic science of antiquity (the antiquity of preliterate period), as such a period in human history did not exist, and should take the place of the auxiliary historical discipline (which she has held in the past) is also and the science of Paleolithic.
As for the discipline will come in its place as a major, then this has already identified — its name arheonika.
Conclusion Four. Arheoniki essence is that it is a fundamentally different way solves the problem of the artifact. For her, the main thing — the spiritual component of any historical monument, while materializes again.
It follows that the first appointment of nominated people found the object carried by his line, the relationship of the artifact to the general structure of a lost, not the passport number, date, location and square layer (or data about the person who found him), which are Still very supporting data that are likely to interest only by archaeologists.
Conclusion fifth. The main idea of comparative linguistics (comparative) that in ancient times (Paleolithic) there was a common language of humanity, confirmed.
Any language, to coexist with this common language of humanity, we have in any case been found. Thus, this branch of linguistics to be congratulated on a well-deserved victory.
However, this language was not reconstructed in some detail Indo-European, and even less researched, but Delayed almost to the Upper Paleolithic Nostratic.
The only language of mankind for a huge time of human existence (from two million years ago to five thousand years ago) was the one language that can legitimately be called the Russian language. But this contradicts the findings of modern comparative studies.
Conclusion sixth. It follows from this that the modern world languages tree where the trunk is first Nostratic language, Indo-European language and then should be discarded.
Russian language is never (in the foreseeable period) was not the language of the young (which speaks in favor of its complex phonology and lexical huge fund, as well as highly transparent word formation and the presence of a large arsenal of grammatical phenomena), and has therefore not displayed in the form of one of the upper branches of the tree.
It forms the bottom of the trunk and all the major branches, including such as the Roman-Germanic, Baltic, Celtic, Indian, Iranian, and others.
The conclusion of the seventh. To the modern Russian language, such as its state language Novgorod letters, literary language of Kievan Rus', the language of "Veles book" Etruscan (etrusetska mova), Serbian language inscriptions of the tenth century BC, the Old Slavonic language, and language Rusetsky Paleolithic can be considered historical dialects of the Russian language, and not separate language.
Therefore, all covered in this monograph labels I refer to the inscriptions in Russian, but not in the modern Great Russian dialect.
Conclusion eighth. From all the foregoing that the history of Russia is the history of all mankind, not just a stage in the history of Russia. True, this fact does not follow, though Russia claims a special place in the world or at least a unique place in world history.
All peoples are equally heirs of Russian culture. Therefore, the study of Russian culture is the starting point for understanding the cultures of all the other peoples of the world.
Conclusion ninth. Modern historiography, according to which any of the Russian ethnos to the ninth century AD did not exist, is false.
It in no way confirms the factual material that shows the opposite — that the Russian ethnic group no less a couple of million years, and that in the Paleolithic inhabitants of the Earth called themselves gay Rusichi.
Therefore, this historiography, at least in Russia, must be discarded and replaced by another.
Conclusion tenth. Other historians arheonike should be based on the spirit of this monograph. You can see that almost every place on earth had a name RUSS with appropriate adjective, but not yet identified all the names.
And from the sacred geography can move on to the study of artifacts that area, in order to later give at least brief sketch of the history of this area: any gods worshiped what animals equated to the gods, hunted, fished and who live what the legend of which animals were composed what tools and techniques with which were made (this section is largely uncovered by archeology) that existed social institutions, and what the real needs of society are met.
Conclusion eleventh. In the Upper Paleolithic special reverence temple complex, located in what is now Ukraine, on the banks of the River Dairy, called God-mountain (now — Stone Tomb). It is this Lonneva Russ was called, that is, Russia Lona, original Russ.
And during the Neolithic Mother Russia was on the territory of Serbia, perhaps it was linked to the Neolithic archaeological culture of Vinca. I believe that by doing so explicitly addressed the issue of the ancestral home of the Aryans, that is, the Indo-Europeans.
Conclusion twelfth. Western Europe was also inhabited during the Upper Paleolithic, the south of modern France called Runov Rus. In other words, it was the center of visual and written culture, a combination of the Museum of Modern art, library, educational center and place of worship.
By Russ Runov Porunova bordered to the north (later Perunova) Russ, the current Germany and the Baltic States. Runova Russia extended to the Pyrenees mountains, beyond which the hunters appeared briefly, hurrying back to Russia (probably, this area was either hot or dangerous).
Conclusion thirteen. The cave is not a place of residence, and images — not just art, thought now. In the caves were artifacts of several types:
- Technical guidance, for example, the presence of boats in the grotto.
- Engraving or painting pictures on the walls with pictures of animals (animals here or called, or, as the patrons something recruited or placed them on a small tale.)
- Sliding plate with the contours of animals and stories on one side and continuation tale, or displayed on the particular transport on the back (today archaeologists call them "Churinga", that is, prayer stones, similar to the Australian, but rather a certain picture in front of us with the story of the mythological content, original comic Paleologo-matic).
- Individual stones like "Kashcheev pies" with inscriptions on them.
- Handicraft products like tusks or boomerangs.
- Musical instruments such as drums.
- Small religious objects such as pendants ("gay") and images of goddesses ("Paleolithic Venus"). Major religious objects like baths or basins for washing type jaw of a mammoth.
- Small items such as wands social purpose or circles Mary.
- All products will certainly contain inscriptions, indicating a stronger degree of "primitive syncretism" (image + text) than researchers thought before.
Conclusion fourteenth. Judging by the interest groups and the rod of Mary, works of art of the temple Mokos, tools Rod temple, ritual statuettes of Mary Church, ancient temples served not only religious, but to a much greater degree of social functions.
Thus, temples Mokos procure a marriage, love and fertility patronized, produced water treatment, supply the population works of art.
Temples Rod supplied population tools, makes a building and engaged architectural projects and plot plans of buildings, watched the sun and the stars, created a map of the constellations and lay-out of the area.
Temples Mary has licensed trapping or shooting animals which hospitals and medical centers with a set of teaching materials, coupons issued in the form of "circles of Mary" to perform functions such as protection of the public, to obtain information or food.
The jurisdiction of the temples were also Mary and funeral services for the funeral, as well as production figures and inventory in order to put it next to the dead.
These functions, I brought not only on data of this monograph, but as a result of research carried out in many of my other publications.
Conclusion fifteenth. At first glance it is surprising that, of all cultural objects were found a single one who would talk about the war, troops, guards, bodyguards, Prince, armor and more. Only one inscription in a cave Madeleine speaks of "Old howling," that is, a man who once fought. But it could be an old hunter who was driving game howling at those who sat in wait. And the head was called "Vozh," that is, the leader.
From all this we can conclude that the state, as a combination of violence, while not exist. But the company is at a very high level of social organization.
In my other work, I found that the centers of social life is a temple, not the center of the community (no word on communities in all the inscriptions I read failed).
Consequently, the system was not community (it does not matter as to whether a generic or community neighbors' association). And even more so that the social order was not a "primitive" because the product was a long-term social development.
And as the center of social life in those days were the temples, I named this type of social organization of the temple system.
It — something other than "primitive communal system," it is not known historical science.
Conclusion sixteenth. All the legends of various peoples of the world say that the first was a golden age, then silver, then bronze, that is to say that humanity is gradually degraded.
However, in the middle of the XIX century in Western Europe, a new philosophical concept — progressive development.
According to it, in ancient times, people were primitive, crop production and consumption were rudimentary, and the stones (very time consuming material) were treated only to work on the instruments received less dense objects (wood, bone, horn, etc.).
In contrast, our technological advances compared to Palaeolithic unusually high.
However, research has shown that in the caves of the mountain God (stone grave) people knew of the existence of sperm whales and sea lions ("Dudar"), which in this area is certainly not found in the caves of Trois Freres cave noted that the constellation of Ursa Minor was Mammoth constellation that existed probably tens or hundreds of thousands of years ago (that is, astronomy in the Paleolithic already there), and the treatment of cuts engraved on the stones required the use of stone cutters and the corresponding engine.
All this, together with the widespread proliferation of writing, says a very high level of culture in the Paleolithic (in other articles I have shown that in many respects, the level was higher than at present).
It follows that the right that the ancient myths and modern interpretation of Palaeolithic current academic historiography, as a time of very low development of human culture, is false and must be rejected.
Conclusion seventeenth. During the Paleolithic, Neolithic, and yes maybe there was only one culture — Russian. No other ethnic groups were not.
On the other hand, in the Bronze Age, we see the existence of a very large number of ethnic groups, which, of course, could not appear suddenly.
Consequently, during the Mesolithic and Neolithic (and possibly, in the late Upper Paleolithic) underwent a process of emergence of new ethnic groups, which at the writing itself is almost manifest. It may be called latent ethnogenesis.
This process is almost unexplored.
Conclusion eighteenth. New historical source, until you get citizenship in history, are inscriptions on stones, walls, caves, rock surfaces. As can be seen from this monograph, they are very informative, although the process of identifying and reading associated with certain technical difficulties (but easy to overcome.)
It follows that, in addition to store libraries of written and printed documents, historians must be created to store litoteki ancient stones with inscriptions and engravings.
Conclusion nineteenth. All historians specializing in the time preceding the antiquity, as the most ancient language should be required to study the Russian language and palaeography, and not only Latin and Greek.
For the Russian language — the key to the ancient culture of mankind.
Conclusion twentieth. All caves with engravings and drawings, and first of all the caves of Stone Grave, should be declared a World Heritage Site and defended humanity by UNESCO as the most important evidence of ancient human history.
They must be preserved, as the most valuable museums in the world, to have adequate funding and proper care.
Their treasures to be logged in the broadest scientific use.
This monograph is to some extent a result of years of work of the author on the study not only Paleolithic texts, but also in general in Russian script.
Only in this paper, I reviewed 184 Palaeolithic source, two Mesolithic and Neolithic 56, that is, only 242 characters.
Is that a lot?
If we consider that in all the caves of France along the river Weser contains about 2,000 images, and that there are at least several hundred small artefacts, I covered approximately 10% of the sources of the Stone Age.
It is clear that the study of ancient inscriptions in large numbers has been possible only because at this point I began to realize that in Russian writing, not only Russian but also foreign "pravilschiki" in the illustration of books in the early XIX century, and that the presence of Russian language on the icons in the picture of the greatest painters — not a strange whim, but a rule, and that the further into antiquity, the more you can find the text in Russian.
But then their existence in the Paleolithic is not surprising and does not explicable strange accident, but quite natural and expected result of my previous research.
Each of my monograph devoted to the consideration of a party of Russian literature, brings new information as yet unknown academic science.
Unfortunately, instead of establishing the widest possible cooperation on the part of silence was observed first of these results, and then a very strong and unmotivated their rejection.
This suggests that the real reason for such a negative attitude towards my work is not a search for truth, academic researchers, and the maintenance of the old paradigm, that is purely corporate interests.
Particularly revealing in this respect for me for two events.
So, in 2008, I took part in an archaeological conference in Tver, and my report I did at the rock on which I read the name of the goddess Mary.
The existence of the inscription engraved on the stone saw not only view, but also to touch guests — trassologi, geologists, ordinary lovers of antiquity — but no professional archaeologist to stone pointedly did not fit. In order to have a reason to say later that "he personally did not see any signs."
Another incident occurred in 2009 in Arkaim, a young archaeologist, accompanied by my group as a guide, at my request, read in one of the ancient sculptures word MIM — read on their own without my help.
After that, he said loudly, "This can not be," and was still assuring tourists that archaeologists deal with nonliterate cultures. That is, to drive unsuspecting lay the nose.
Another manifestation of negativity by academic structures became lecture Academician AA Zalizniak fall of 2008 against "amateurs in linguistics." Although my name was not called, the vast number of examples of "amateurism" was drawn from my work.
The whole spirit of this lecture followed that my ability to read ancient texts is a sign of my dense ignorance, while the inability of academic science is supposedly a sign of the highest professionalism.
This statement sounds a ridiculous joke.
Finally, in the year against me almost daily leave publishing certain "LiveJournal chudinologii", where the level of the mat and "Yazygs padonkaff" peresmeivanie made all my scientific achievements.
Libels on me compose, using photomontage published distorted my photos, my texts are quoted and distorted obessmyslennymi I get abusive epithets discussed my personal life. And all this is done in order to declare me then "pseudoscientist."
In other words, the action of the regular structure of a fee in order to discredit any of my innovations.
From the latter, I conclude that my rejection of my opponents have gone beyond the borders of Russia, because my findings affect the political interests of some countries, and especially the West. Because it is one thing to believe that the whole world culture went from Greece and Rome, and quite another — that she had once been completely Russian, but in the recent past — largely Russian.
Therefore, in the past five centuries, there were several invasions on Russia, we have replaced the ruling dynasty of the Romanov clan (which in some years was frankly German), we have changed the Russian Orthodox Byzantinism a frank (and banned in Soviet times and Christianity), and in the XIX century Russian nobility speaking French.
In other words, the political elite, and even commoners Russia were vaccinated Western culture and Western view of Russia.
And now it turns out that the entire West is the current heir to the great Russian culture, and that the French guides lead tours of the caves of Dordogne province, demonstrating excursionists pages of ancient life Runov Russia.
Whether it is France? Whether it's the West in general? A pleasure to him to realize that the most interesting southern provinces were a written text of Russia, and the rest was called Okolopismennoy (Porunovoy or Perunova Rus), and later became known as Porus (Prussia)?
No wonder all the last millennium of Russia and Russia against the West has worked tirelessly information war. And the current generation of school children in all countries (including us) to read books that have won the second world war the brave American men, atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, dropped the Soviet Union, and the first space explorers were American astronauts.
In such an atmosphere of imaginary superiority of the West is not surprising that academic historiography in hand with comparative linguistics believes that Western man, or Aryan, originated with his great high civilizations long before the eastern people, which supposedly are and Russian.
This book documents refutes these allegations, as unscientific and shows numerous examples that everything happened just the opposite.
That was the first Russian civilization, and reached great heights of development, thanks to non-Western society organizations (public service), and the enormous role of the temples, which were in their shops producers of wealth, while guided by the same churches primarily spiritual values .
This is not only our past, but — with reasonable amendments to the features of our civilization — and our future. For the current path of development, as shown by the global crisis, leading to the pit.
I believe that this book will be received by the scientific community is ambiguous. And that, along with its champion, and it will have a very strong opponents. However, I hope that sooner or later, the main ideas of this work will be included in scientific use.
Of course, the book marked only the first steps in understanding the mighty civilization of the Paleolithic. The true study of the basic phenomena in the front of it.