By 2015, NATO will be able to close the back-missile nuclear attack Russia?

By 2015, NATO will be able to block the back-missile nuclear attack Russia?

This meeting of the Russia-NATO defense ministers in Brussels, the capital of the North Atlantic Alliance is not completed anything constructive. NATO has rejected Moscow's proposal to develop a joint European missile defense and the Russian Federation have refused to give any written security guarantee. In principle, even a written guarantee of the Russian Federation does not provide security in the belief: Hitler's non-aggression pact did not prevent poruha the USSR. And the U.S. and NATO can produce all sorts of guarantees, but ultimately poruha based on their own interests. The only guarantee in such a situation can only be a Russian army and navy, capable of even retaliation cause such harm to the aggressor, that he even thought does not appear to us poruha. And in spite of NATO and the United States can vary only a complete fool or a conscious liberoid, for whom the interests of Western civilization, the United States, Western Europe, above the interests of the motherland.

The head of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation Anatoly Serdyukov was disappointed with the meeting: "We have received positive and clear answers. Our fear was not allayed. NATO has not yet heard the proposals of the Russian Federation on missile defense. NATO insists on developing 2-system-independent. By 2020, Europe could be created system ABM, which negates the Russian strategic potential. " Although the Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Lukashevich said that although the situation is not easy, but it is not a dead end. Moscow is ready to continue the dialogue, in the preparation of legal guarantees from NATO.

Just surprisingly, people are hard-nosed in their own stupidity — the U.S. and NATO in the last decade, and the Western European countries in their own stories, so many times violated these obligations. Representatives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs or little knowledge of the history of diplomacy? After all, the reality on the planet, nothing has changed in the last century — the "law of the strongest" and "the right of the winner" has not been canceled. What is the difference defeated, what legal safeguards they were given? Who would complain? God? The "strong", in other words, the United States and its allies and make the so-called "world opinion", while others simply do not hear voices.

According to A. Serdyukov, in the case of agreement with NATO is not found, the Russian Federation will be required to improve its nuclear deterrent force in the direction of improving the abilities of a breakthrough anti-missile systems. In turn, NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said that they did not agree with the initiative of the Russian Federation on the defense sector in Europe. But Serdyukov did not sum up by saying that the talks will continue, since there examples of successful cooperation: joint air exercise "Vigilant Sky 2011" maneuvers and "Bold Monarch-2011", etc.

Submissions

By 2015, NATO will be able to block the back-missile nuclear attack Russia?
— According to the views of a military professional, first vice-president of the Academy of Geopolitical problems Sivkova Constantine, "Rasmussen said mean that Russia should be prepared not to" cool "and a hot war. To her West pushes its crisis of civilization. Today's crisis has exposed the fact that North America has everything — especially the "world factory" China and oil-producing countries. And you do not want to pay. "Because at the Western civilization, its more brutal and strong parts — the United States — there are only two choices: to change the system and destroy your own financial oligarchy or at means of a global war to force the world forget about the economic, financial dilemmas the United States. And in order to get a guarantee of their own security, the United States must have completed programs from defense. Negotiations with Russia are underway to put psychological pressure on Moscow and Moscow did not give a pass to the side of probable enemies of the West, the Islamic world, the BRICS countries.

— Deputy Director of the Institute of USA and Canada Studies Pavel Zolotarev believes that no joint missile defense with us NATO build and was not going to, even year reverse of this was said in the latest concept for NATO. Yes, and "panic or read about the beginning of the modern arms race and" cool war "would not be worth. It should be remembered that some forces are keen to involve Russia in a large-scale arms race, that undermine our economic potential and the rest. " Answer need for diplomacy front, persuade delay the deployment of missile parts, deepen cooperation. On the other hand, Russia is to bet on the development of modern high-precision weapons.

— First deputy chairman of the State Duma's international affairs L. Kalashnikov believes that the end of the U.S. and NATO's own plans to build a missile defense system — when in 2015 the U.S. deployed 900 interceptor missiles, including 400 missiles "Aegis» SM-3, in the event of war with Russia, will allow the U.S. and NATO do not fear retaliatory nuclear strike Russia. Because of the Russian Federation, first, you need to "stop the destruction of its own Armed Forces, which has lasted for 20 years." In diplomacy to achieve limit the number of missiles, taking into account the potential of zero until the DPRK and Iran, to seek out the deployment of missile defense systems in the shock space. In case of refusal — to get out of the START-3, and turn away from negotiations on tactical nuclear weapons.

To the question against whom make missile defense?

The U.S. and NATO constantly talking about the fabulous dangers of Iran and the DPRK (North Korea). But the reality is that Iran has no nuclear weapons, no ICBMs and when there will be — is not clear, maybe in five years, maybe in 15 and whether the general himself Tehran denies the existence of plans to develop its own nuclear weapons. North Korea has only a few low-power charges, also had no impact on carriers for the U.S. and Europe. Well, there are huge doubts that Iran and North Korea, even if it will jointly develop an ICBM 15-30, will threaten Israel, Europe and the United States. Pyongyang and Tehran is ruled not complete morons with a complex suicide, and completely pragmatic people. Strike U.S., Israel, Europe will lead to the complete destruction of these states. They need it?

But the U.S. and NATO plan to deploy in 2015 to 900 missiles. Against who? It is clear that this system makes against nuclear missile potential of Russia and part of China. It is focused on the highest mobility and enough projected missile defense system: for example, about half of the complexes will be of THAAD, you can flip the military transport aircraft, the other part — the sea-based. They can be quickly redeploy to the borders and shores of virtually any country in particular take into account the extensive system of U.S. military bases.

In addition, U.S. is a lot of work to increase t
he capacity of interceptor missiles: the interceptors THAAD system can only shoot down warheads of tactical ballistic missiles and medium-range missiles, missile capabilities, "Aegis» SM-3 is larger, and constantly do better as accuracy and range. It is clear that the worst-case scenario, soon they will be able to hit Russian ICBMs and their warheads.

In addition, the need to take into account the great potential of the U.S. and NATO in the field of sea-launched cruise missiles, with the help of NATO first strike kill a significant portion of our RC.

By 2015, NATO will be able to block the back-missile nuclear attack Russia?

Sources:
http://www.rian.ru/politics/20110609/386311456.html
http://www.dni.ru/polit/2011/6/8/213665.html
http://www.pravda.ru/world/northamerica/usacanada/09-06-2011/1080024-nato-0/
http://svpressa.ru/society/article/44300/

Like this post? Please share to your friends: