Iran-USA: Diplomacy aggressive sanctions. World View of U.S.

We offer our readers opinion about the proper content of U.S. policy toward Iran, expressed by a representative of South American students, the future of the U.S. municipal employees whose careers will be linked to international politics and, perhaps, with security of their own country. Jesse Avila (Jesse Avila) — a student of the Institute of Georgetown (Georgetown University) practiced on the dilemmas of human rights, movement, popular culture, national security and terrorism. Avila shows in their own questionnaire that one of his beloved media comes a "favorite" our channel Fox News (recall the recent story with video from Athens, which was issued for the footage of rioting in Moscow, also interrupted an interview with her niece and Ossetian events August 2008. For those who have not beheld: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNBHs9lH_FM). Such media bias creator of the publication is completely explain the specifics of its content. With the known bias of the material, it does not call for aggression against Iran, there is a change of the regime, etc. This is not just another standard acts overseas propaganda on their own as individuals, as a typical reflection of the current U.S. position on Iran, refracted in the mind of an ordinary citizen, burdened by some knowledge of international politics. The article is specifically interesting. Thus, the text of the article (translated from the British)

To prevent a war with Iran, the United States should build diplomacy sanctions

Owning a nuclear weapon Iran threatens security of the United States on several fronts: increasing the terrorist threat, threatened U.S. allies, hurting the South American interests in the Middle East. In over long years, Iran showed anti-American sentiment, opposed the South American role and influence in the Middle East. In addition to the brutal policies toward the United States, Iranian government has actively supported the revolutionary movement in adjacent countries and is an active sponsor of terrorist organizations such as Hezbollah. Iran possessing nuclear weapons will pose a significant threat to U.S. security, as it will be able to stuff without much problems terrorist materials and technologies produce nuclear materials or provide them with the opportunity to exploit their own nuclear arsenals. For this reason the United States to address the difficulties of the Iranian nuclear weapons must use a combination of tough economic sanctions and diplomatic non-violent strategy.

At the current time, the U.S. chief enthusiasm in the Middle East, is to ensure the flow of oil from the Persian Gulf at a reasonable cost and in the right quantity, the protection of Israel, reducing the danger posed by rogue states and to prevent the implementation of terrorism in the region komplotov Near East. In the case of Iran acquiring nuclear weapons data promotion of American interests in the Middle East will become very difficult. One of the main problems is that nuclear Iran is able to make a model of competition in the oil industry by the band of the Iran-United States-Russia. Iran armed with nuclear weapons could complicate the ongoing activities in Iraq and Afghanistan, and, as mentioned above, to support terrorist organizations in these countries.

The U.S. should continue to push for the resumption of diplomatic discussions with Iran. This discussion should be a comprehensive negotiations that aimed to elimination or significant control over the issue of nonproliferation of nuclear weapons. Diplomatic measures taken previously, focus only on the creation of preventive non-proliferation. United States put a lot of effort before the sanctions, sought multilateral reciprocal steps to curb Iran's nuclear ambitions. These diplomatic measures were missing, they were not able to counteract the great eagerness to make Iran a nuclear weapon. And this is after the confirmation of the work on its creation have been found in breach of contract with regard to non-proliferation of nuclear weapons.

On the other hand, the re-orientation on economic stimulus measures will continue to put pressure on the possibility of introducing financial and material resources of the nuclear programs from Iran. The brutal economic sanctions should include measures to reduce the consumption of Iranian oil in favor of Saudi. Another fundamental component is the inclusion of Iranian companies and companies in the blacklist, so as to limit the possibility of their work in the global market. The main element of the sanctions will freeze Iranian assets, and not just those associated with the process of uranium enrichment.

The most ideal option is that Iran continued to develop nuclear energy under severe control of the United States or the United Nations, with the guarantee of work in other areas (for example, to finish the financing of terrorist organizations, cooperation in the Arab-Israeli conflict, etc.). This is the case when the Iranian inevitably spread. This approach will allow not only to embody the principles of the Contract on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, and will help to prevent at least some of the military and civilian conflict, will also push Iran the adoption of international standards of responsibility.

Redirecting it (Iran's) current plans for the resolution of pressing economic and diplomatic problems, the United States will remove the shortcomings of today's strategy to address the issue of Iranian nuclear weapons and will remove the possibility of destabilizing the situation in the Middle East.

Like this post? Please share to your friends: