What we need an army?

I have served in the Russian Army, it was in 1988-1990. I'm lucky, and I got to the training regiment (Lads Camp) in the suburbs. I will say at once that there was no hazing, was so called "ustavschina." But it should be noted that, because it's stressful learning process. It was not just uchebka, and non-commissioned officers school. We were running in the morning until the evening, dug in, shot at and studied the "Morse code" (Morse Code). There was also a drill, there were dresses and march throws and lifts the alarm. To what I remember? And the fact that after six months uchebki I learned to shoot out of all small guns, throw grenades, lay dig trenches, digging tools, and a lot of what else. And apart from anything else, the specialty was military chief of radio stations and radio telegraphist 3 cells. In other words, if the deal specifically with military and political training, that with the right approach for compulsory military service, missing half a year uchebki. The remaining 18 months, I just "missed" in the "troops."

The Army currently runs across a professional base. Naturally, the current requirements are that Prof. cheaper and more effective army conscript army. Here are just a few comments …

1. Army to wage war! No fighting army decomposes and loses battle spirit. As I see it, Professor Army must constantly be on our toes, and for that she should take part in the fighting. Anywhere. In Africa, in Asia, in the Arctic, in the woods and in the field. Among scientists, many do not learn. At the moment, there will appeal to my "charity", they say: "Do not pity the soldiers?" It is a pity! But if we want a professional army, we need military prof. A military occupation — WAR. If the profession is not engaged, then loses specialist qualifications. Firefighters I'm sorry, too, but that does not mean that they should not put out fires. Intelligence agencies constantly at war. Police officers risk their lives … So I am for what would army waged war. To find a place to play in the "voynushku" in the modern world presents no difficulty …

2. The army must be social elevator. Excellent salary, housing, what that preferences (for example, kids to college of choice without competition), compensation for injury or death (for the family). All this is solved, but not fast enough.

3. Conscription MUST to be! Men in ALL of mandatory order, the girls at will (voluntarily). The call for six months, to the training units. Within 6 months, it is to prepare people for military service as a private. All deferment (for tuition) to cancel! No "military departments." EACH should to be able, if necessary, to protect his homeland with a gun in his hand.

4. Allow instead of compulsory military service to carry currency. Funds for the "slope" should not go in the pocket military commissar and the state budget. Well, sort of anyway, while those who will still hang … Such people are, in principle, the army is not worth taking …

5. BAN those who did not serve in the army, to have firearms tool. Although the peasants, even the ladies. You want a gun? The gun? Go to the army for six months. I think we should ban and obtain a driver's license. Although, I know, here I hardly support. By the way, the rights may be issued in the army. In uchebke and train ride.

6. Prof. military to allow the wearing of personal weapons.

Do not be afraid of wholesale conscription. In the army of Israel are ALL. And nothing. I think that, with this version of building the army, many who came for six months, zahochut stay, even more so, if will be a sufficient number of social guarantees and benefits. And who does not remain, will have the moral right to be called the Paraclete Fatherland and drink vodka together with all the 23 February. Specifically, since he was in the army, and not as wearing pants …

Like this post? Please share to your friends: