Who delivered the difficulties Russian peacekeepers?

Who delivered the problems the Russian peacekeepers?When it is the positioning of the Russian Federation in the international arena in terms of military operations, then this arrangement is mainly manifested in the form of the use of Russian troops outside the Russian Federation only as a peacekeeping force. Although in recent years the word "peace"Has taken a lot of different meanings, all of which are beneficial to a certain political force. In today's world, it turns out, you can make the peacekeeping mission in down and spreading the remains of rockets homes of peaceful inhabitants, and you can do peacekeeping operations so that the number of armed clashes between frustrated by the different sides of the barricades parties not only did not decrease, and even opposite — increased with every year. Some peacekeeping forces of some countries are produced or statistics, or to gratify some personal goals. In such a situation it is very difficult to figure out where is the peacekeeping mission, and where — totally militaristic.

Look more closely at those peacekeeping missions in what is now engaged and were used not so long ago, Russian troops on the territory of the former USSR.

One of the most challenging missions in this area before 2008 was mission in South Ossetia. Russian troops arrived in the region in 1992 (based on the Sochi agreement, signed by Yeltsin and Shevardnadze) to suspend military actions that have taken place to be between ethnic Ossetians and Georgians. The Georgian population of South Ossetia, for obvious reasons, supported by regular army troops of Georgia, but to the detriment of the Ossetian population. Aggregate peace except Russian military contingent included more Ossetian and Georgian forces. Soon after the start of the peacekeeping mission in the administrative center of South Ossetia is based mission OSCE.

During the whole of that period as long as the peace-programm was launched in South Ossetia, Georgia samples taken to get rid of Russian troops in the mission taking part. With all of this all parties were well aware that as our home will withdraw its troops from South Ossetia to start brand new and bloody war between Georgian and Ossetian peoples.

Official Tbilisi tried to put pressure on Russia to use all available channels of communication, referring to the United States and the OSCE for help and advise. Apparently, no assistants from the United States or advisers of the OSCE Misha Saakashvili could not offer anything more effective, if all recognizable hit "888" on the Russian peacekeepers and civilians in South Ossetia which Georgian later side, Using terrible news pressure from the West, tried to refute all the forces, calling Russian propaganda.

Eventually, in December 2008 the peacekeeping mission Russian troops in South Ossetia and in Abkhazia immediately, was terminated, and instead of the peacekeeping contingent in the area of new independent states were located military bases Russian Federation. Now Georgia side declares that it is the Russian occupation, but for all that, for some reason, forgets that the occupation is referred to as a phenomenon in which people living in the occupied territories, obviously does not support the occupation forces. Tbilisi and forgets the fact that Abkhazia and South Ossetia overnight turned into independent states specifically after the order was given to the settlement of Russian peacekeepers in South Ossetia and the peaceful inhabitants of this troubled country. Then this: if, according to the Georgian president, the occupation, who, if he did not, it became a pioneer? ..

Since the end of the Russian peacekeeping contingent in South Ossetia and Abkhazia has been more than 4 years, but the actions of August 2008 up to now clearly remind the world that it can result in non-compliance with the peace agreements by the state to the detriment of some of the population own a country.

By the way, those who take the side of this conflict, the current Georgian president, RF love lament the fact that, say, why, then, Moscow has given the order to send troops to Chechnya in 1994. That after all, they say, leaves, Moscow in 1994 was possible, and Tbilisi in 2008 can not? But then the people who express the idea of such comparisons, or forgets, or deliberately silent about the fact that over the Chechen Republic is no international agreements in the availability of peacekeepers was not. The fact of joining forces in Chechnya, no matter how wrong and destructive it was not (that's another matter), fully fit into the framework restore constitutional order in a single country. The Georgian authorities have taken a different method, and left what happened …

Now quite a difficult situation around another peace mission of — the mission in Transnistria. There is often also have a place to be a provocation on the part of the Moldovan side, which, of course, aimed at squeezing the Russian peacekeepers from the region. The problem would be completely solved simply and Russian troops came to the area to TMR, if not a "but." Neither the government of Transnistria, no people, which live here, not burning desire to behold the Russian peacekeepers pakuyuschih bags and knapsacks and intending to return to Russia. And no more burning desire to behold them here Moldovan units that can again try to begin to show who is the owner. In fact, of course, and here that, as the last leg of Russian peacekeepers leave the Transdniestrian Moldovan Republic, Chisinau so try to do everything in order to regain control of the Tiraspol. With all of this it is unlikely such samples will be confined only to the diplomatic norms.

The Moldovan authorities now try to follow in the footsteps of Misha Saakashvili, trying to attract the attention of the West to the Transnistrian dilemma. West, of course, thinking about the bravery of the Georgian president in 2008, diplomatically silent or denies Chisinau muddled words of friendship and the need to cooperate with everyone and for everyone …

Of course, that what would be subjected to external pressure or Russian peacekeepers in places where they serve as part of the agreements, to give up the slack under no circumstances should you. Any one-sided concessions in this regard here will lead to a spiral of conflict newcomer. In the end, the extra creative leaders can be called Russian military peacekeeping force anyone (though the barbarians, though the occupants), the main thing is that the mission of the MS (peacekeeping force) is focused on the protection of regional peace, although someone this world, apparently, quite not profitable … But this is, as they say, his personal difficulties.

Like this post? Please share to your friends: