In 2009, the national debt of Greece was 127.1% of its GDP. A year later, he had risen to 142.8% in 2012 is forecast to be 170%, and in 2013 will reach 186% of GDP. A GDP — the sum of all money, arrangements of pocket to all transactions. Question: where did he come from, this debt? Once the Greeks have GDP, then they are doing something. They grow olives, cheese and brandy sold again, tourists go.
Do not forget also that the money tends to move, turning around more than once a year. How many times, no one will say, but suppose every EUREKA caught in Greece, turned a year five times. So, to create the GDP, they had to borrow money in an amount equal to one fifth of GDP. A debt for 2011 exceeded the entire GDP of nearly half. So, in 2011 Greece should give money to thirty times more than received. This is if the country in general, all the money taken if there was anything from their previous cases, on foreign trade.
The impression is that the people of this country fatten for others, not to go to work, and at lunch eating only pineapple with hazel. If so, there should be a country that Greeks owed. But this country is not!
For the salvation of Greece took the "giants" the eurozone — Germany and France. Read the newspapers: they themselves have debt! At the end of the second quarter of 2011, Germany owes 2.07 trillion euros and France national debt amounted to 1.693 trillion, or 86.2% of French GDP. Italy's national debt exceeded 120% of GDP. China's national debt — and China, among other things, active and label products the world — reached 43% of GDP!
Thus, humanity runs on the same track all in debt, and to save denezhek have in each country to reduce the minimum guaranteed wage, freeze salaries of civil servants, cut pensions, defense spending, health care and local autonomy. In short, the life of the people degrade and reduce the security of the countries. The less money, the less you do the work, the higher the unemployment.
Modern money get into the economy and society only through the provision of anyone — government, employer or a private person — a loan with interest.
Other consequences of the interest of the monetary system, except for inflation competition for the money — the need for endless growth and concentration of wealth. This requires continuous GDP growth.
War of the money for the payment of interest destroys first of all the areas of activity, which, in fact, make us human. More profitable to divert finances in the sphere of speculation, where the real economy is still 2% of all international exchange transactions, and the rest — speculative. Within countries, a similar picture: the speculation, mediation and game business, that is, classes that bring maximum profit with minimum investment, finance more interesting than the small business, support of culture, promote health of nations.
Modern states and such structures are not completely stable, and now they are in addition fully subordinated to the interests of global finance — even more unreliable, unstable, dangerous structures, have no interest in the development of the economy or the survival of the people, not the peaceful future. France in 1980 and Britain in 1990, Scandinavia in 1992 and Mexico in 1994, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, and the South Korean government in 1997, Russia in 1998 — all have seen this.
At the beginning of the business cycle all take loans and invested, who wants to, hoping to make a profit or a good salary and pay off the bank. Is an economic boom, the pyramid grows. If someone goes bankrupt — more successful businessmen are buying the property, taking a new loan secured by the property, the growth continues. But it is time to return en masse usury. And where to get the money? They just do not.
A businessman with few options: to delay payment of salaries to employees, or to cut and wages, and the number of employees up to scratch, to his ruin. A worker who receives credit in the calculation of the financial well-being, is no income or no work and can not repay the debts. State borrow under its budget, "forgets" all our social commitments, but even in this case, can not cover the debt.
If you recall, in the mid-twentieth century, academic economists have proposed mechanisms to prevent global crises. They said, it is necessary to strengthen state regulation of production, the creation of international financial institutions, monitor, etc. So they did, but that's now visible to all these false ideas. As always, the more powerful countries in the world trade threw off their troubles on the less powerful. "Suddenly" was that the mechanisms for crisis prevention do not work.
Meanwhile, many already clear what happens. In 1992, the UN Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro, 18 thousand people from around the world comprehensively discussed world problems. Following the discussions, the Conference Secretary-General Maurice Strong concluded: "The Western model of development is no longer suitable for anyone."
Twenty years have passed. Policy of higher rank is important to talk about the offset of the "effective financial architecture" — as it was, for example, at a summit in St. Petersburg in June last year. There Finnish President said that we should de "improve the tools of the global response to large-scale financial challenges."
It becomes clear that address the causes of the "top" no one will. Under the current paradigm change anything. A paradigm shift is possible only during the disaster.