Serbia and NATO: Woe to the vanquished

Serbia and NATO: Woe to the vanquishedKarel Schwarzenberg, the first Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Czech Republic — the country has long recognized the independence of Kosovo, gave, after all, the precise definition of what everyone knew or guessed, but were afraid to read aloud. Serbia — a country defeated in a war with NATO. Now the West's policy towards Serbia is determined by this basic starting position: the losing party must pay the war against the winner of resource and territory … As they say, vae victis — conditions always dictate the favorites, and the losers have to be ready for what ever the tragic turn of events. Schwarzenberg most outspoken: "This is nothing new. All have long been perfectly clear. Serbia must make progress on the issue of Kosovo … Conditions everyone knows concessions can not be. I can only recommend Serbian friends to take a clear decision and accept the fact that it can not be changed … Serbia lost the war. But often lost in the war area! "(1)

Karel Schwarzenberg (born in 1937) — one of the more influential politicians in Europe. Schwarzenberg — an ancient Austrian family, recognizable from the XII century. More famous Adolf Schwarzenberg, Field Marshal, Imperial Count, in 1599 defeated the Turkish army in the Battle of the slave fortress — it was the first victory over the Turks in Europe. A cohort segodnyaschy European ruling elite that owns and K.Shvartsenberg not opposed to the idea of Turkey to the Balkans "to be eaten." Karel Schwarzenberg, spent many years in Austria and Switzerland, as Schwarzenberg family had to leave after 1948, because their family was considered an emblem of the German influence (more precisely, suppression) and the feudal terror. After oppression "Prague Spring" of 1968, he rapidly rose to the side of the Czechoslovak dissidents, and between 1984 and 1990. headed International Helsinki Committee, it was his duty to register violations of human rights in the countries behind the 'iron curtain'. Under President Vaclav Havel became the head office of the head of the country (1990-1992). Among other things, Karel Schwarzenberg, considered the richest politician of the Czech Republic, called himself an inhabitant of Central Europe with a Swiss passport (Schwarzenberg in the Middle Ages had the Zurich citizenship, and has a Czech Karel). Now Schwarzenberg is a favorite of right-wing party TOP09, part of the ruling government coalition. October 20 this year 1st Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister of the Czech Republic Karel Prince Schwarzenberg delivered a keynote address as a candidate for the presidency of the Czech Republic … (2) Since the representatives of the ancient German ruling families of Europe, acting now as conductors expansionist projects, drives the peoples of Eastern Europe in poverty and powerlessness, dictate the conditions of Serbia favorites.

This nuance of 5 rounds of talks between Belgrade and Pristina (March — July 2011), sponsored by the EU, with U.S. support, are not even negotiating such as, for Kosovo regime did not go to any concession. A similar form of bilateral meetings in the narrow range of internationally mediated (more precisely — the guide control), faster, is a further development of post-war criterion of surrender Serbia. Why on earth should be made "three-point" (recognition of acts of Pristina Serbia registry offices, personal papers and college diplomas) that do not have a settled legal status, unconstitutional, not ratified by the Serbian Parliament in general, and even legally not designed? Also added to them the "agreement" of the consulate Kosovo at international forums as the independent state, and "integral" border management (West and Pristina are definitely treated as municipal boundaries)? Let us emphasize this — the unequal agreements it — acts unquestioned and unquestioning surrender, only stretched in time after the defeat of Serbia.

On the new negotiations between Belgrade and Pristina, the same line will be carried out with greater rigidity. NATO's Center for Strategic and International research (Center for Strategic and International Studies) in November 2011 in its own report pointed to the need for translation of the future dialogue Belgrade — Pristina with the "technical" to the political level with the achievement of certain results. Were offered items such as the inclusion in the agenda of day or questions about the north of Kosovo and the "border Serbia — Kosovo", emphasis on "restoration" and ensuring the territorial integrity of Kosovo, conducting a joint campaign to increase international recognition of Kosovo from 5 EU countries that did not recognize Kosovo, the transition from "international supervision" to the "development of the country", the end of the European mission EULEX and proceed to the functioning of the supreme representative of the European Union (EU special representative — EUSR), acting in close contact with the U.S. Embassy in Pristina, Kosovo's inclusion in the visa process liberalization, the beginning of the negotiations with Kosovo to sign the Agreement on Stabilization and Accession to the European Union with a proposal to Pristina "road map" to the status of a candidate. (3) These items systematically produced, regardless of who are currently located in Serbia in power.

British representative in the European Parliament Nigel Feridzh reads: "All politicians in the Balkans only make someone else's job … but the main issues addressed in Washington and Brussels, not in Belgrade … and me funny when people ask me, when will the New World Order. Since he has long arrived. Not bad it is either bad — a look at a global situation. It's all right or all the flies in the gulf? Decide for yourself. Serbia to the abyss! Serbian politicians are very intimidated and nervous, they do not know where to get the money … The problem is that Serbian politicians do not give trouble to solve something, just ask Washington and Brussels, what to do next, instead of something to do themselves. Maybe the north of Kosovo will be Serbian. But it is unlikely. " (4) Daniel Server, for its part, shows that Belgrade must make a commitment to integrate the north edge under the authority of Pristina, and "now it is necessary to give Belgrade authorities time to assimilate the idea." (5)

Meanwhile Pristina sold all marginal electricity distribution network "Elektoroenergeticheskoy campaign of Serbia", serving 400 million users, the Turkish concern "Chalikov and Limak" for 26.3 million euros. (This fact has been disregarded Energy Minister of Serbia Zoran M., but that is not ashamed to call an international scandal and go for odnostronnyuyu substitution of documents at the time of signing of Serbia and Russia on the construction of the pipeline. Moscow assessed the incident as a "scandal" (6)). Wesley Clark, the last commander of NATO forces in Europe, and is currently head of the energy company "Enviditi" from Canada, asks for his own company a license to explore the deposits of minerals in Kosovo for the production of synthetic oil from coal. The fact that 76% of supplies of coal Serbia (16 of 20 billion. Tons) are in Kosovo — is the largest and most economical from the standpoint of the development of their coal supplies in Europe. But the creation of oil from coal — enough dirty development, infecting the environment, especially water. Yet the company Wesley Clark wants to create 100 thousand barrels of oil pe
r day. (7) Albanian (Pristina), the privatization agency has illegally privatized a good half of the 1358 Serbian companies in the province, at the same time without the consent of the owners. This Millard euros! (8) And all these billions of dollars of loss does not already identified at the beginning of the negotiations between Belgrade and Pristina.

While I.Dachich leads talks with H.Tachi, favorites Serb north edge (and they are a full party to the negotiations) refused to recognize the so-called agreement on "integrated border management", sending a letter to the president and the prime minister of Serbia and requesting a meeting with them and introduce them to a "platform for Kosovo and Metohija." But in Belgrade, they have not yet heard. In general, the beginning of negotiations is characterized by the complete unpreparedness of the Serbian side, and therefore more resembles the surrender of positions in the "remote control". In other words, NATO's military fury against Serbia at the moment must be supplemented by the removal of the countryside and the resources of this country as an indemnity. But the "winners" while far not convinced taciturn agreement with the Serbs 'legalization' seizure of Kosovo and Metohija. In the international legal nuance prepyadstviya allies Serbia Our stay home and China, holds, does not give the north edge of, well, the vast majority of Serbian voters voted for Tomislav Nikolic, hoping for a change in policy of Belgrade, first on the Kosovo issue.

The official, according to the canons of international law, the recognition of the Serbian authorities 'independence' torn away from her by force area will be completely irreversible, destructive nature of municipal existence of the Serbian people.







(7) http:/ /


Like this post? Please share to your friends: