Stanislav Tarasov: Why Iran talks, six in Moscow ended in failure

Stanislav Tarasov: Why Iran talks, "six" in Moscow ended in failureIn Moscow completed two-day talks, in what was the role of the head of European diplomacy, Catherine Ashton, the secretary of the Supreme State Security Saeed Jalili, Iran, and the Russian side — Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov.

Meeting in Moscow — this is the third round of negotiations over Iran's nuclear programs from. The first two were held in Istanbul and Baghdad, but did not bring any results. Because the meeting in Moscow was made a special rate. Previously accomplished in Beijing meeting of the presidents of Russia and Iran in the format of the SCO summit, Vladimir Putin and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. After that, the Russian Foreign Ministry reported that prepared a special scenario for these negotiations, which, according to some estimates, had to have a breakthrough character. Well, he secretary of the Supreme State Security of Iran Saeed Jalili on arrival in Moscow stated that "looks with optimism on the prospects for capital round of negotiations," stressing the importance of compliance with the agreements reached at the previous round in Istanbul and Baghdad.

And yet in the end? Iran has decided to play in the "strong", exposing his earlier proposal of 5 pt, the answer to which depends Tipo upcoming progress in the negotiations. Similarly, as the "Six" has come up with the so-called the "step by step" plan, the authorship of which belongs to Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov a: Iran removed a number of restrictions in response to the fulfillment of certain requirements of the "six". But it seems that Tehran has decided to play in a more "supreme diplomacy" by entering into circulation — with a hint of Israel — Contract position on non-proliferation of nuclear weapons.

Segodnyaschy mission in Moscow, Tehran looks quite mysterious, since the head of EU diplomacy Ashton generally played up to Iran, agreeing with the proposed transfer of technical discussions at the Tehran meeting in Istanbul, to be held on July 3. The idea is that everything had to be in front. If there is a need to connect to the analysis of the Iranian nuclear dossier prepyadstviya expert groups, then it could be made after a meeting in Baghdad, and not to transfer to Moscow deal with the technical character.

Recall that recently the Moscow round of talks in Strasbourg, political directors of the "six" met with Catherine Ashton. Later, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov open a discussion with the management of the situation of Iran in Tehran and personally communicated with the main Iranian negotiator Saeed Jalili. In Moscow, the Iranian ambassador received by the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergey Ryabkov. Moscow sincerely tried to reach a compromise agreement. But Tehran insist on the fact, that in the interval between the talks met deputies and professionals who would formulate questions for discussion at the next round of negotiations, the capital. "We declared itself already own willingness to follow the same day after talks in Baghdad. I'm sorry, but now with the day or those negotiations has been more than 2-weeks, and the reverse side has not yet announced its own readiness to talks the willingness of professionals to organize a meeting deputies to prepare for Moscow, to prepare the agenda of day or negotiations ", — said Jalili, apparently realizing that he practically replaces the negotiating agenda of the day or.'s why began to form a firm sense that Iran together with the West to act out Moscow common scenario.

In our opinion, the essence of it is that Tehran activation of Moscow towards Iran was evaluated from a different perspective — as an attempt by Moscow to withdraw prepyadstviya Iranian nuclear file from the zone of confrontation only between the U.S. and Iran. It's not like Tehran. Because the reasoning of the Supreme Council of the Secretary of State Security Council Saeed Jalili that the international community should "recognize and respect the right of Iran on nuclear technology, including the enrichment of uranium, "and that Tehran, in turn, is willing to "cooperate on non-proliferation of nuclear weapons" — is only elements of diplomatic rhetoric.

Russian side is not without reason to expect positive results from the talks, that the decision to pre-empt the Iranian nuclear issue by force. Moreover, it is natural, and the fact that the coming meeting of the "six" with Iran in early July in Istanbul and will not achieve the specific arrangements. But the main intrigue in another. The talks in this format, "six" will be continued. The framework has already been developed severe array of thoughts and suggestions that can be implemented by applying the principles of "gradualism and reciprocity." Tehran only deprived the ability of the new Russian President Vladimir Putin to launch the embodiment of a breakthrough in the direction of Iran. Now we'll see that for Iran to make its Western partners. It will either delay the negotiation process, or increased tension and hence the tightening pressure on Iran, or go to the military action, as urged by right-wing conservative circles in the U.S.. As they say, everyone chooses their own destiny.

Like this post? Please share to your friends: