Sheremet vs. Melyantsou: versions and political consequences of terrorist attack

Society
Or compelling evidence against the detainees in the case of terrorist attack in the Minsk subway? What are the President's statement about the attack of the political and social situation in the country, which were heard on Saturday? As far as convincing version of the involvement of the authorities in the terrorist attack?

On these issues in the "Prague accent" expert discuss the Belarusian Institute for Strategic Studies and a columnist Denis Melyantsou Russian newspaper "Kommersant", one of the leaders of the site "Belarusian Partisan" Pavel Sheremet.

The transfer is Sunday, April 17. Repeat on Monday.

We offer you a transfer of fragments

I am well aware of the investigation explosion in 2008, based on his conversations with former Interior Minister Naumov … There was a basic version — part of special services, not necessarily Belarusian, but intelligence agencies, not anarchists or lone suicide … I am surprised by the statement that the government is disadvantageous that explosion.

Sheremet: Version, voiced by the authorities, it is very controversial … I have no doubt that among the Belarusian secret services there is a consensus about the version of the attack … There is growing evidence that the terrorist attack committed professional … Lies reinforces suspicions about the authorities … So far we only hear about the objective evidence, they have not brought us … I am well aware of the investigation explosion in 2008, based on his conversations with former Interior Minister Naumov … There was a basic version — part of special services, not necessarily Belarusian, but intelligence agencies, not anarchists or lone suicide … I am surprised by the statement that the government is disadvantageous that explosion. I understand that the people who are now in Belarus, every word can respond serious problems. But then it is better to remain silent than to try to justify the actions of the authorities … I tried on Friday to talk to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Poland Radoslaw Sikorski on the situation in Belarus, and he ran away from me, repeating the words of the attack … It seems we are talking about with Denis different countries, are now discussing the attack, everyone forgot about the currency crisis

Melyantsou: I was a little alarming that so fast were made recognition in all three attacks. But the version does not seem fantastic. Much more unlikely and fantastic time version

Thus we come to the conclusion that the attacks are not just systematic and random. Therefore, single version of the terrorist has a right to exist

Ordering from the government or the opposition, or Moscow … The authorities need this attack less likely, especially given the economic difficulties and political consequences of last year's elections. Terrorist organization does not solve a single problem: does not distract from the currency crisis and the rise in prices is not conducive to obtaining loan from Russia, the EU and the already never would introduce economic sanctions, and a fortiori does not contribute to the exit of international isolation … The opposition in its current form is not capable of terror and does not want him here just to samazahavatstsa … Thus we come to the conclusion that the attacks are not just systematic and random. Therefore, single version of the terrorist has a right to exist … Paul was right to say that we are probably talking about a different country, I see the same line in exchange near my house … I do not see any benefit to the government, and not because I'm afraid, but because they do not see the argument. Those arguments are presented Paul, are not strong enough to convince me and others.

Like this post? Please share to your friends: