Duck on NATO in Russia

Duck of the NATO RussiaThe near future is increasingly in the web are very different stuffing heresy. The purpose of her ordinariness: discredit management RF. In the course are any ways sauce "betrayal" served no matter what kind of information.

In particular, often has come across is such a "DUCK"

"Putin in 2007 personally signed contract № 410940-4 with NATO that, in the event of civil unrest and man-made disasters, the troops NATO can freely borrow area RF and to conduct military operations on it. "

And this nonsense is replicated font in bukovku in various forums.

But, what is the essence.

Electrical registration card on the bill № 410940-4

http://asozd.duma.gov.ru/main.nsf/ (Spravka. .. & RN = 410940-4 & 12

But the law itself.

http://ntc.duma.gov.ru/duma_na/asozd/asozd…-% D4% C7 & dt = 2007

What we have in the end?

1. No contract with the Russian Federation № 410940-4 NATO not. There is a bill (not even law!) Under such number. Of this bill came out Federal law № 99-FZ, which is called:

"On Ratification of the Agreement between the states — members of the North Atlantic contract and other states participating in the program" Partnership for Peace ", on the status of their forces on 19 June 1995 and the Additional Protocol."

Ratified, with small refinements Agreement of 1995! That's the whole essence of the document.

It is a question of the status and the rules of stay of foreign troops on the territory of other states during joint exercises. With all of this right in the text of the document reads:

"For the purpose of implementing the Agreement between the states — members of the North Atlantic contract and other states participating in the program" Partnership for Peace ", the status of their forces from June 19, 1995 Russian Federation proceeds from the subsequent realization of the following provisions of the Agreement between the Parties to the North Atlantic contract status of their forces from June 19, 1951. "

2. It is a question of principles of jurisdiction and punishment of the deserters and soldiers have committed a sin, while their presence in the opponent's area. Not only their fighter from us, and our fighter at them!

3. It is a question of customs and transit of goods.

4. The law contains not one word "that, in the event of civil unrest and man-made disasters, the troops NATO are free to take the area of the Russian Federation and to conduct military operations on it. " Not even close.

Ye believe not every delirium. Inspect.

And most importantly — think.

The next time, remember that spreading such nonsense, or fool, or a smart employee "not our state."

In any case, it is not worth listening to.

Like this post? Please share to your friends: