The state of modern historical science was particularly clearly obvious this year — 2012 has been declared by President Dmitry Medvedev "Year of Russian history." As of July 15 (exactly half a year has passed) any results of the Company has not presented. None of the relevant institutions stories Russian Academy did not give any to the Russian people, the Russian president nor any work, the results of which in some way be brought to light at least on some controversial moments of Russian history.
And there are a lot of things. Suffice it to say that we are "officially" know nothing of the history of our people, apparently took place before 9 — 10 centuries of our era. The "official" science of history up to the present time leads to teach our children to historical materials formed in the 18th — 19th centuries. And despite the fact that such materials were frankly concocted by persons in those years engaged in blatant criminal attitude towards Russia. We specifically do not call here no historical names, because this article is designed to historians, who, of course, without the help of others to get to know the characters outlined in it.
Political nuances of falsification of history
What, for example, achievements in the history of the Russian language was given in the near future specialized universities for the study of the Russian language? Virtually no. We like before do not know the time of the appearance of the Russian language, nor place, nor the trajectory of its development. All data about our native language as previously generated in the walls of zabugornyh special services and they control the academies and institutes. And in these criteria as before some "scientists" of the respective origin of the fable about the issue to the surface that the Russian language, allegedly, was formed in the Middle East. Other "scientists" sing along with them, and output the "ancestral home" of the Russian language over the boundaries of land now occupied by the Russian government.
This is done in order to create in the minds of Russians are confident that the Russian people is alien to the Russian countryside. The calculations of these "scientists" controlled and directed by the intelligence services of the Russian Federation aggressive countries have the ultimate goal: "Russian people must be convinced that he is a stranger to the Russian land that he gave Asians own language, and it is now time to return to the Russian people that all areas nations that are more ancient Russian. "
So Makar, historical linguistics and history are in the hands of experienced butchers weapon of mass destruction that can cleanse Russian expanses from that inappeasable and such mundane invincible weapon of the Russian people. And if so — historical — a victory over the consciousness of the Russian people takes place, the foreign companies and foreign invaders, formed of only "friendly" to us people, we can only ask the energetic release "them", "historic" homeland of our presence.
Mongolian falsification of Russian history
Here is just one example of doing the actual combat by means of historical wars. We are talking about fictional people — "Tatars" and his invented by historians "home", which is now identified with the criminal territories of the Russian Volga region. Now Tatars expel Russian people of this area, run across to the Mongolian language, in general, are engaged in illegal activities in violation of the Russian Constitution, and directed to the segregation of the Central Russian lands. Oh, so everything happened and is happening.
In 2005, the Mongolian diaspora summed up the historical "evidence" by the dating of "their" capital — Kazan. As a result, the Tatars officially celebrated the millennium of the Russian town. In other words, the Russian city of Kazan on the "new historical" data, razdobytym Tatars, was founded in 1005. This fact is we are not particularly worried. We are outraged that the Russian city of Kazan is now represented in the status of the 1000-year-old town as the capital of the Mongolian ethnic group.
But back in the 19th century the Tatars called "a number of people of Turkish origin, mixed with pieces of Tatar speaking a Turkic language … In V. under the name of Tata or Tata (hence, perhaps, is the word Tatars) razumelos the Chinese Tatar tribes living in the north-eastern part of Mongolia and parts of Manchuria, between the rivers of Khalkha, Kerulenom and Songhua. In XI. Tatars conquered the Tungus and partially settled in the south-western Mongolia. " In the XII century. Genghis Khan formed in Central Asia, the powerful kingdom of the huge number of Turkic peoples, which became known under the name of Tatars, and the Tatar element and were absorbed by Turkic language. In 1223 a contingent of Genghis Khan leaked to the Caucasus. Another part of the Tatar and Russian broke Polovtsian princes at the Kalka River. The successor of Genghis Khan sent his own nephew Batu to conquer the western states; 1237 Tatars have struck Russia, defeated Hungary and Poland, but the upcoming move to the west was blocked by a host of the Czech king and barons of the Austrian and Carinthian. Tatars turned back and founded the Golden Horde on the Volga, which stood out from the Crimean Khanate, Astrakhan and Kazan. In the XVI century. Siberia is based independent Khanate Tatars, who lived along the rivers Ob and Irtysh, Tavda, Ingulov and their tributaries, it is won by Ermak "[Brockhaus and Efron, 1909].
Naturally, we are aware that in the 19th century, historians have been spices, able to understand the scientific component of the historical sources available to them. Because the oscillations about the fairness of the above can not appear. This means that the Volga Tatars appeared and began to establish something entirely in the 13th century. In this regard, it is natural that the three centuries attributed the Tartars "their" Kazan superfluous, although more precisely — the first three centuries Kazan was the Mongolian city, and founded the Kazan Tatars did not.
After the present Russian government, which distributed the eternal Russian land to the left and to the right, outstanding special on the history of the Tatars and RG Mukhamedova Khalikov subsequently wrote: "The Tartars, the main population of the Mongolian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (1536 ths. 1970 census) . Turkic language of the Altaic family of languages. The first time the ethnonym "Tatars" appeared in the middle of the Tatar tribes who roamed in 6 — 9 centuries. to the south-east of Lake Baikal. In the 13. with the Mongol-Tatar invasion name "Tatars" was clear in Europe. In the 13th — 14th centuries. it was vserasprostraneno to certain peoples of Eurasia, which were part of the Golden Horde. In the 16th — 19th centuries. Sources in the Russian Tatars began to call many Turkic and some other nationalities, who lived on the outskirts of the Russian country (Azeris, a number of peoples of the North Caucasus, Central Asia, the Volga region, etc.). For some of them the name of the ethnonym Tatars was. In … 15 — 16 centuries., During the existence of separate feudal countries (Kazan, Astrakhan, Crimean, Siberian Khanate, etc.), is the f
ormation of separate groups of Tatars — Middle Volga and Urals (Kazan Tatars, Mishari), Astrakhan, Siberia, the Crimean etc. "[BSE].
We litsezreem, more than a century historians position has not changed: the Tatars — this is the Chinese Mongoloid tribe illegally settled on Russian lands in the late Middle Ages.
But after the next, succeeding the collapse of the trial of the Russian Federation (the collapse of the Soviet Union) peripheral nations snatched for themselves decent pieces "of their age-old" Russian lands. But the Tartars until this issue is not lucky. Therefore, in order to udrevnit "his" story, they even went to the complete abandonment of their national identity — "Tatars — not so much the direct descendants of the Golden Horde, as the indigenous inhabitants of the Volga Bulgaria, the Mongols conquered immediately with Russia." And this is not an April Fool's joke. On this basis, the state Congress president Bulgar (Republic of Tatarstan) Guzman Khalilov appealed to the European Court of Human Rights, and sought to rename the Tatars in the Bulgars [b-Idiatullin, 2000]. The Tribunal did not support the Mongolian joke.
It was an example of active expansion of different nations, aimed at re-form their own history and the history of Russia. And criminal intent here is, that by fabricating stories Tatars Tatars form right on the terrain of another nation — Russia.
Falsification of history of the Russian town of Kazan
The fact that the Mongolian diaspora "set" the date of Kazan at the level of 1005, provides not only the falsification of age this Russian town. This action exposes the cynicism of all the "official" historians with which they approach the purity of its subject. If the newspapers, on television and on the radio "official" historians are choking with indignation "unprofessional" the study of history, then proplachennyh public gatherings criminal gangs, these same "official" historians are blowing in a tube, a total of offenders actually falsifying history. Again, we are not going to name names, they can find out from the official conference of the collection, the one which has been set itself the age of the Russian town of Kazan.
But there would be no falsification of Kazan, if at least one of the 10-s Professor of historians who were present at that meeting, stood up and read a quote from the Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh: "Reason Kazan refer to the second half of the XII century ., in the annals of our city was first mentioned at the end of XIV century. An ancient city was previously near the place where the village now Prince Kamaeva; preserved fort there is to this day the title of an old Kazan; own place in the city today has existed since the XV century. "[Brockhaus and Efron, 1907].
Moreover, the location of an old city of Kazan exists Museum — Suit-Kazan Municipal historical, cultural and natural museum-reserve, in which there are 14 employees out of their 4 researchers. The average number of visitors per year is 6600 [IKGMZ, 2012].
Ancient Kazan is "45 km to the northeast of the modern Kazan, near the villages of Mongolian Aisha Kamaeva, Russian Urmat Vysokogorskogo region of the Republic of Tatarstan". Here, "the sacred in all of ordering site hosted a range of unique historical, cultural, archaeological and natural sites, are now included in the protected zone of the Claim, Kazan Municipal Museum. "Iske Kazan" is translated into the Russian language means "Ancient Kazan '" [IKGMZ, 2012].
Prof. historians could not know such a "trifle." But for political judgment, silent. And it's — it's clear. But the fact that they are all my ostepenennyh composition on that ill-fated conference attempted to falsify Russian history should give a legal assessment of the Russian Federation Prosecutor's Office.
Falsification of the existence of the Kazan Khanate
Another invention of historians is "the Khanate of Kazan ', which, allegedly, came after the collapse of the Golden Horde. In the dictionary entries about it, "khanate" creators enthusiastically exaggerate the "historical accuracy." For example, Kazan, allegedly from 1438 (1553) became the center of the "Kazan Khanate," and, allegedly, the layout of streets of Kazan had tangled nature and concentrated to the Kremlin.
But no written evidence of the emergence of the Kremlin does not exist. And only in 1556, in other words, after the disappearance of the historical arena invented "the Kazan Khanate," come to Kazan in Pskov 200 masons, headed Postnik Yakovlev and Ivan Shiryaev, and only 1568 were built 13 stone towers and a significant portion of the walls of the Kremlin. Now the white-stone Kremlin, the southernmost reference Pskov architectural style in.
It is believed that only in 1552 the ruler Ivan IV conquered Kazan Khanate and annexed the area to the Metropolitan State. But on the cards since before any "Kazan khanate" and other khanates not applied (see, for example, Fig. 3 and 5). All maps lifetime "of the Kazan khanate" "his" area includes a Muscovy or Moscow empire. Moreover, all the place names on the same card Russian — no Turkic titles.
And, of course, they are at the time and could not be, since no Mongolian language was not there. "Tatar languages — obsolete term for some of the Turkic languages. The word "Tatar" — Tatar tribal title, designated historically Tatar generals mingled troops during the so-called "invasion of the Tatars" to Russia. Then, apparently, the term has been moved to a Turkic ethnic group, are part of these troops, who were settled in the Middle and Lower Volga Region "[LE].
If further studies continue, "Tatar" language, we find that it is only the language of the Islamic religion (as is now Arabic), which was formed only to the 19 th century, and the significant literature on it began to develop only after the revolution [LE].
And yet, as the general population, "the Kazan Khanate" is usually referred to as just "Tatars" and "Chuvash". We have already shown above that the Tatars — this Chinese tribe that had settled illegally in the Russian lands only in the 13th century. And Chuvash same. "Large groups of Chuvash live in Tatarstan and Bashkortostan, which moved back to the 17th — 18th centuries …" [TSB]. In other words, in times of Kazan 'Kazan khanate "Chuvash have not lived up to their arrival was still as much as 3 — 4 centuries.
If systematic process all the data, also delved into ancient maps, which are now very widely available, the following picture emerges which points the entire scope of the "official" historical falsification. This whole string of "khans", which the national "outstanding" "scientists" perpetuate the age-old Russian territories, adopted such a scale that put coined &qu
ot;Khanate" in the heart of Russia will not present any difficulty.
"Official" Scientists do not motivate such details as the distance of 45 km between an old and a new Kremlin and the city, "scientists" are not interested in even the lack of language and the people, who is credited with creating one or another "khanate". "Scientists" are only interested in one thing — as much as possible to spread to areas of Russia "of the ancient states," which would later generously paid its own exit from the Russian Federation that the most "honest" "official" scientist.
Falsification date of establishment of the town Tyumen
We represent the Russian side of the story, which shows the scientific impotence "official" schools and institutions and that whole nations can cheat with historical dates, and with the political consequences of the replacement date.
"Traditional" story says to us that, as if the conquest of Siberia, Russian — a process that took place during the second half of the 16th — 19th centuries. In this context, allegedly, "traditionally" is that it has to start at 1580, and coincides with a campaign Ermak Kalashnikov with the Cossacks (1581 — 1585 gg.) For a "Siberian Khanate." In 1586 Vasily some bitch founded Tyumen, which seemed to be the first Russian city in Siberia and is, allegedly, on the former site of the capital "of the Siberian Khanate." In 1587, allegedly based on the Irtysh Tobolsk.
Map "Muscovy" Sigismund von Gerberstein was drafted in 1549. It was based on the material of his trips to Russia during the reign of Vasily III. As you know, Vasily III Ivanovich was born in 1479 and died in 1533. Stately prince of Vladimir and the capital he was in 1505 — 1533 years. Baron Sigismund von Gerberstein (German Siegmund Freiherr von Herberstein) was born in 1486 and died in 1566. The largest known in Russia and abroad have acquired over their immense works on geography, history, and the internal structure of the Metropolitan majestically principalities and kingdoms. Visit (2nd) Gerberstein to Muscovy was held in 1526.
So Makar, date of visit (1526), the years of the life of the Russian Tsar Vasily III (1479 — 1533). Gerberstein and Sigismund (1486 — 1566 gg.), Also made by him dating card Muscovy (1549) — all located in the full agreement. So that's on the map Gerberstein (see Fig. 3) already have Tyumen (1), even though the "official" version, before its foundation was still as much as 37 years. Apart from this small town on this piece of card, there are three of the town — it Obelkas (4) acter (3) and Kumbalak (2) also has a lake China (5).
It turns out that the "official" version of what Tyumen, allegedly, is the first Russian city in Siberia and was based in 1586 by Vasily some of a bitch lying.
Falsification date of establishment of the town Perm
A similar situation was lying not only in Tyumen, and with a few more ancient Russian towns.
Oh, so on the basis of the town of Perm Big Russian Encyclopedia states: "In 1723, on the site of the village Yagoshiha (introduced in the first 17.) At the confluence. Yagoshiha to Kama copper smelter was built in the village, renamed in 1781 to the city. From 1781 Perm — Perm Center governorship, in 1796 the provincial capital "[TSB, Art. Perm]. On a map of the Metropolitan empire, made in 1600 (see Fig. 4), the city of Perm is located. Moreover, labeled and Perm province, which obviously indicates the importance of the town. And this for 123 years before it, allegedly, appears!
We litsezreem city of Perm and the Perm province even earlier — on the map Tartary (Scythian) Sebastian Munster (see Fig. 5), which he did in 1544, based on Sigmund Gerberstein [Card, 1544]. Perm is also specified on the map and the Asian part of 1593 [SD, 1593], also on the world map of Herbert Norterna (Habrecht Northern) 1628 [SD, 1628]. Perm and the Perm province are also in the said map Gerberstein 1549 [SD 1549]. Perm is indicated on the map of Europe Mercator made in 1595 [Card, 1595], also on the map of Muscovy, compiled by Gerard Hessel in 1614 [Card, 1614] and many other cards of different composers from different countries.
On the map 1562 "The location of the Russian Muscovy and Tartary" Anthony Jenkinson (see Fig. 6) are also shown and Perm (Permvelikaya) and Tyumen. And all this before the "official" date. It turns out, the city of Perm and the Perm province existed for at least 196 years before the "official" reason to Perm town, and everyone knew it geographers in Europe, and was applied to the city of Perm and the province of the same name at the right place cards, as measured and the big city, so large that it had even point on the world map. But Russian and Russian "official" historians, someone, apparently, teaching, were able to find their pathetic attempts to date only "reason" Perm, relating to the 18th century. It's a shame Russian and Russian historical science? Either this is deliberate sabotage of the "official" historians proper presentation of Russian history.
Tampering with the date of the opening of the Bering Strait and Alaska
A similar situation exists with the "discovery" of the Bering Strait and the Russian Alaska. Again the same, Big Russian Encyclopedia contains the following sentence: "At the time of the discovery of Alaska Russian explorers in the 17th century.". But what exactly does this phrase — is unclear. If what is in the 17 th century Russian explorers discovered Alaska, it is spreading to the following proposals of the same article TSB: "By the mid-30s. 18. Due expeditions P. Nagibina Bering, A. Melnikov, I. Fedorov, M. Gvozdeva were conducted first survey of Alaska, but only with the expedition A. Chirikov 1741 is usually associated opening Alaska "
Other encyclopedia provides more specific information: "The first pieces of information about Alaska Russian explorers were in the late 17th century. The map Remezova S. (1701), based on data Atlasova V. et al Alaska depicted as an island. The practical results of survey of Alaska were achieved in 1732 (Fedorov and M. nails). In the end, the expeditions of Bering and A. Chirikov (1728, 1729, 1741) have provided important data on the nature and population of the coast of Alaska. With the expedition of 1741 is usually associated discovery of Alaska "[SEI].
According to the Western version of "accepted" to believe that the first snow-white man to set foot on the land of Alaska, was GV Steller, a naturalist from the ship Bering (1728) [Alaska, 1993]. But "in reality" the first representatives of Western civilization, to visit Alaska August 21, 1732, were Russian explorers — Team members bot "St. Gabriel »under the authority of the surveyor MS Gvozdeva and assistant navigator I. Fyodorov during the expedition Shestakov and DI Pavlutsky 1729 — 1735 years [Aronov, 2000; Vakhrin, 1993]. In 1778, an expedition to the shores of Alaska has taken James Cook.
It is believed that the Russian Sailor Dezhnev in his own expedition in 1648 first rounded the Chukchi Peninsula, ie 80 years earlier opened the Bering Strait, which separates Asia from America. Early October Dezhneva ship moored to the shore south of the mouth of the Anadyr. Dezhnyov drawing up the Anadyr River and parts Anyuya River (a tributary of the Kolyma River) and petitions (which is understandable 4) described the nature of the voyage and the Anadyr region [SIE]. There are scraps of information about visiting the Russian people of America in the XVII century [Swerdlow 1992].
Fig. 7 is a piece of the map of Asia, published in Amsterdam in 1632. The dating listed on the piece. Here locked himself Bering Strait and South American land, in other words, is laid up in Alaska. Preserving the true wind data: Showing land Sina, the Chinese wall, Japan, Korea. This map was in walking for 16 years before the mission Dezhneva.
On the map of Tartar empire, was released in Padua in 1621 (see Fig. 8), is also specified and the Strait of two banks — the Russian and South American. Japan is shown below. In other words, the main reference points are true. And it's for 27 years to Dezhneva. On the atlas of Abraham Ortelius 1570 [Map, 1570] are shown and the land of Alaska, and the land of Far East, and the strait between them.
The current "face" of Russian historical science
In this article we are not specifically named or nicknamed 1st scientist from the galaxy of "remarkable" the "official" research, which forces national groups falsify Russian history. But one exception — for example — create. This teacher from Bryansk Arthur Chubur. For a start, in 1991, he graduated from the Faculty of ufology some "All-Union School" "Basis". And then immediately became the "official" "academic" "scientists".
"But the WAC Russia withdrew its final thesis and the question due to falsification of documents approbation competitor. Excavated parking Bulls surrounded Kurchatov. Kurchatov during his tenure came to an end the conflict with the local history museum, part of the funds he illegally brought in Bryansk, roughly stolen. The activities of the AA Chuburu typically unusual combination of extraordinary energy and obscure techniques and field study work, unfortunately, for a demonstration of a number of representatives of the most recent generations of historians and archaeologists Kursk "[Schavelev, 2009]. In this regard, journalists dubbed Chuburu "Bryansk Mavrodi" [Mountain, 2012].
It turns out that, under the guise of signs "official science" are here Chuburu distort Russian history, yelling with joy, "Raska in flight" (Chubur). A real honest researchers have to clear up the mess later — and that is if the power just right to hear them.
We have presented only a few examples of incorrect dating of recognizable historical events — those that are taught at school. I was surprised to discover that faith is the "official" historians akin to religious faith. But if the religious faith allows pastors to manipulate the most uneducated and naive "sheep", the belief dishonest "official" historians allows the forces standing behind them, manipulate whole countries and their property.
These manipulations are concerned not only the old stories, but even new. Such criteria are experts at political wars, armed with a "reliable", "historical" data, grab a slice of whole areas of the country, its people move out, grab entire sections with minerals. And if anyone thinks that this problem — the problem of falsification of history — is entirely fictional and not related to the present, he is deeply mistaken. Waste of Russian lands for fabrications "historic" pretexts lasts to this day. Recall the action.
Just a few days back, July 12, 2012 Our homeland has given Ukraine Russian peninsula Tuzla [Tuzla, 2012]. If the document on the transfer of land will be the ratification of the Russian State Duma of the Russian Federation, this gift will accept legitimate view. Meanwhile, the peninsula formed from Tuzla Tuzla Spit, which, in turn, was a continuation of the Taman peninsula. Kos has been blurred in 1925, but the Taman peninsula with Tuzlinoskoy oblique always placed to the east of the Strait of Kerch, in other words belonged to Asia, and means for Russia.
A September 15, 2010 Our homeland of Norway gave 90 thousand square kilometers (land, approximately the size of Portugal) offshore holdings of. The Russian State Duma ratified the document on criminal transmission. In 2004, Our homeland has given China a few Russian islands in the Amur River with total area of 337 square meters. km. And this "deal" Russian State Duma ratified.
But perhaps the most merciless act from all points of view, was held in September 2010, when our country has given Azerbaijan half of the Samur River water intake and two Dagestani village with 600 citizens living there of. The worst thing — the fact that there are no boundaries of Azerbaijan does not recognize any government, for the handing over of land and the people — it is doubly terrible act. But more Straseni explanation which has permitted himself to the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Grigory Karasin, representing document Duma. He simply mocked: "So ordered history, we will be in contact with them."
As you would expect in science, new data can not always confirm an old theory. Let us recall the epic with the Earth and the Sun: Even after the Christian Inquisition has burnt carrier of the modern theory, the sun was not revolve around the Earth. And in the present history — an influx of public fraud
almost tearing area of Russia, and all this is available from the "official" position. But the truly behold the experienced people that such refinements for stories is all just a criminal plan to individuals or groups due to seizure of Russian land, under which the "new owners" are trying to take the "official" "historical" basis.
Aronov, 2000. Aronov VN, Patriarch of the Kamchatka Navigation / / "Issues stories Kamchatka fishing industry": Local History Sat — Issue. 3. — 2000.
Brockhaus and Efron, 1907. Collegiate Dictionary FA Brockhaus and IA Efron. — 1890 — 1907.
Brockhaus and Efron, 1909. Small Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh / In the modern spelling. — St. Petersburg: Publishing company "FA Brockhaus — IA Efron ", 1907 — 1909.
TSB. Big Russian Encyclopedia: At 30 tons — Moscow: "The Soviet Encyclopedia", 1969 — 1978.
Vakhrin, 1993. Vakhrin S., Conquerors of the majestic ocean. Petrop.-Kamchi.: Kamshtat, 1993.
Mountain, 2012. Yuri Mountain. Arthur Chubur — Bryansk duplicate Mavrodi. Newsland. 26.03.2012.
IKGMZ, 2012. Suit-Kazan Municipal historical, cultural and natural museum. 422730, Republic of Tatarstan, Vysokogorsky district,. Kamaeva. Tel. (84365) 70-2-78. Website http://www.museum.ru/M1312.
Map, 1544. Tartary (Scythia). Sebastian Munster. Basel. According to the materials of Sigismund Gerberstein. Woodcut. 1544
Map 1549. Map of Muscovy. Gerberstein. 1549
Map, 1562b. Accommodation Russian Muscovy and Tartary. Anthony Jenkinson. London. 1562.
Map, 1570b. Abraham Ortelius Atlas of 1570.
Map, 1593. The Asian part (Asia Partum Orbis Maxima. Gerard de Jode), 1593
Map, 1595. Map of Europe. Mercartor. 1595
Map, 1600. Metropolitan empire. 1600
Map, 1614. Map Moskvoii composed by Gerard Gessel. 1614
Map, 1621. Tartar empire (Descripttione del potentissimo imperio de la Tartaria. Galignani, P & F., Padua, 1621), 1621
Map, 1628. Map of the World (Hemisphere). Habrecht Northern. 1628
Map, 1632. Map of Asia. Amsterdam. 1632
PE. Literary Encyclopedia: 11 volumes — M., 1929 — 1939.
Swerdlow, 1992. LM Sverdlov, the Russian settlement in Alaska in the XVII century.? / / "Nature", 1992. Number 4. — S. 67 — 69.
SEI. Russian historical encyclopedia. — Moscow: Russian encyclopedia. Ed. EM Zhukov. 1973 — 1982.
Tuzla, 2012. Our homeland and Ukraine agreed on a maritime boundary. «Lenta.ru». 12.07.2012, the http://lenta.ru/news/2012/07/12/sign1/
B-Idiatullin, 2000. Shamil b-Idiatullin. Tatars — this is not Bulgarian. Kazan. Kommersant, № 205 (2090), November 1, 2000.
Schavelev 2009. Historians of the Kursk region. Biographical Dictionary. Comp., Br. Ed. SP Schavelev. Kursk, Publishing House of the Kursk State. honey University Press, 2009.
Alaska, 1993. The Alaska Almanac. Facts About Alaska. 17th Edition. — Alaska Northwest Books, 1993.