The Torah was the Bible

January 30, 2012 13:16

Church "reform» XVII century as ideological subversion and national disaster. Judeo-Protestant against Russian Orthodoxy and traditional Islam. How to beat Russian civilization nestyazhatelstvo?

Who is the Russian? Obvious that both the Russian people living in Velokorossii, Small and White Russia, and the Russian Tatars, Russian Lezgins, Avars, Russian, Russian, Circassian, Russian, Abkhaz, Russian, Kalmyk, Russian, Yakut and other people — all who accept and value of Russian civilization and culture, bringing together primarily on the basis of Russian Orthodoxy — Christians, people of traditional Islam, Buddhism, and the peoples of Siberia. Russian became the basis of the matrix nestyazhatelstvo, community and territorial expansionism, involving in an economic and cultural space of a growing number of people on the principles of cooperation and spiritual unity. With such a positive picture of the Russian Empire, we can only find out what caused the penetration of "antiquated values": individualism, greed and usury, property rights, which was built in the absolute — that is, is anti-Russian, anti-Orthodox concepts, finally led to the "Jewish Revolution" in 1917, and later to the "Reconquista" of 1991?

Since the victory of Svyatoslav Igorevich Khazar Khanate, following the baptism of Rus by his son Vladimir Svyatoslavich until the end of the 16th century to the direct implementation of "antiquated values" in Russia has a serious resistance. Sam "Old Testament" of the Russian Orthodox Church, in fact, has long been the "literature for official use only." But that all changed in the 1650-1660's under Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich, father of Peter I, when there was a so-called "Nikon's reform," and fundamental changes were made in the church life, which led to a split in the Russian Church. There is a lot of research about what happened. Let's try to light them together and analyze the problem in terms of a clash of civilizations and ideologies — the Old and New Testament …

Each of the parties is difficult to remain impartial in the evaluation of events and their consequences. It is therefore particularly interesting to look conclusions Director Library of Congress, the largest specialist in Russian scientist, John Billington, who in 1966 wrote: "The Old Believers accused Nikon in that it permitted the Jews to translate the holy book, and accused nikonianami Believers is that they allow Jews lead worship. Both sides believed … Cathedral 1666-1667 gg. "Jewish gathering," and the official decisions of the Councils accused his opponents that they were victims of "false Jews of words." … Everywhere there were rumors that the government gave "cursed Jewish rulers," and the king took noxious 'Western' marriage, besotted with love potions Jewish doctors "[1].

In this case, you need to remember about the pressure exerted on the Tsar Alexis. Kostomarov historian noted: "In 1649, came to Moscow Patriarch of Jerusalem Pais. He noted that in the Moscow church has different innovations that are not in the Greek Church, and especially was blamed dvuperstnoe addition at the cross. Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich very troubled by these observations and recommendations he sent cellarer Arseniy Sukhanov east for information. But as long as (he) traveled in the East, Moscow managed to visit other Greek spiritual person and also made comments on the dissimilarity of Russian religious rites of the Greek, and on Mount Athos monks even burned prayer books of the Moscow press as nasty Orthodox rite of worship ". [2]

In this Paisios in literacy Alexei Mikhailovich provocative complementarily wrote: "Most Holy Trinity … well you Vouchsafe PERCEPTION you prevysochayshy throne of Emperor Constantine the Great, your great-grandfather," [3]. Perhaps this phrase actually pushes the country to war with the Ottoman Empire, adopted an extremely politically naive Tsar Alexei's intention to launch a "Greek project", the first stage of which was the reform of the church of the Russian church practice, taking the example of the practice of "Greek." But the Greek Church in this matter was a powerful secret ally — the papacy.

Recall that Jerusalem, like Constantinople, more than two centuries was under the rule of the Ottoman Empire — the most powerful states of the time. The set of spheres of social life have been busy with the Jews [4], weaving his anti-Christian affair. Greeks themselves, even renounced Ferraro, the Union of Florence, which was finally undermined the spirit of the Byzantine Empire, after the capture of Constantinople by the Ottomans (1453), the same two centuries, had no self-developed theological school or self publishing. Greek theologians of "science" went to Europe, Latin and Protestant napityvayas spirit. Greek liturgical books printed in Latin, often Jesuit, printing, corrected learned Latins "spravschikami", with a few exceptions largely saturated Uniate, Catholic ideas and / or is an agent of the Jesuits. It is for these reasons, even in 1480, a Russian bishop's oath was included on oath not to accept the Greeks neither metropolitan nor the bishopric. [5] And this oath was in fact violated.

Attempts romanization

It should be noted that a strong impetus for the romanization of Russia became the Smoot and brief reign of the impostor False Dmitry I, who famously promised to Rome, in case of success, the imposition of Catholicism Russia. Held in it permanently Jesuits, who control the process, gave him such instructions: "The most sovereign spell of Union rarely and cautiously, … let them Russian first offered on some unimportant matter of faith that require change, and so pave the way for the union to pass a law … that the Russian Church were all let down by the rules of the Greek Fathers of cathedrals … hint black clergy about the benefits of white rewards people for freedom, everyone — the slavery of the Greeks … to establish a seminary, which encourage people from overseas scientists, although secular " [6]. Ie essence of the "reform" was thought to be formulated and issued to its agents as a work instruction long before the "reform" of Nikon and Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich. The latter was the son of the first king of the dynasty of the Romanovs — the family of supporters "semiboyaschiny" was brought forward in a long time close to them or Dimitri Grishka Otrepiev. Yuri (Juska, Grisha) Bogdanovic Otrepyev grandson from Lithuania with a distinguished name David Pharisees got his nickname "Otrepyev" of Tsar Ivan III, banished "Judaizers" along with their heresy of Russia, (the names of the preachers of Judaism in Russia in XV century are now known only in part — is the same "from Lithuania": Shary, Moses and Joseph Hanusch Shmoyla Skorovey). The same attempt to Jewish proselytism in the West has been successful, turning the Reformation and the emergence of Protestantism.

The Catholic Church as a counter-built a Jesuit Order. Morale system, developed by the Jesuits in analogy with Judaism, they themselves called "adaptive» (accomodativa). This exemption from the Papacy Jesuits many religious orders and prohibitions, responsible only to ordenskim superiors, etc., have contributed to their penetration into various areas. Therefore began to actively appear and Jesuit schools — in Little Russia, and in Galata (Constantinople) and in other countries, and their agents poking around the East. Order resolves many Jesuits lead a secular way of life, to keep secret their belonging to the Order. "All of this increased activity is due Vatican Lutheran reform: the result of its having lost countless ancient her children, dad thought compensate their loss to subjugate the Eastern Church and spared no money for this". [7]

Western Europe at the same time worried about the threat of Turkish invasion (his part inspired by the Jews of Constantinople and the Caliphate of Granada), until the defeat of the Turks under the walls of Vienna in 1683, so "in the papacy in this period (the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.) … Was the idea that Dad wanted to instill throughout Europe: the idea of the crusade to drive the Turks out of Europe … an idea shared by the Polish king Stefan Batory. Plan to fight the Turks are equally carefully designed and in Rome, and in Poland. It was assumed that the intervention should involve Moscow as a tool, and to make it easier to use this tool, it was necessary to subdue his dad … Moscow had to impose a Catholic king ". [8] To retract and weaken Russia adventurous war with the Ottoman Empire, the then almost half of the world lure Muscovite was designated Ecumenical throne.

"In the battle of two tigers always win the third," said Confucius. So, pitting Orthodoxy and Islam, many forces expected to warm hands …

The war with Turkey

First tried to push the Rurik. At Basil III consistently pressed: in 1517 the Catholic diplomat Sigismund Herberstein, then in 1518, the legate of Leo X Dominican monk Nicholas Schomberg (later reached the rank of cardinal and bishop Kapuanskogo). "In order to act on Vasily, he imagined that he is entitled to take Constantinople from the Turks as their rightful heritage, being the son of the Greek Church, and that if he connects with the Roman church, the pope crowned him the king's crown and title, and Russian Metropolitan erect to the rank of patriarch "[9]. Simultaneously influence the Russian Tsar have tried Maxim Trivolis (GRECO). In 1525, Pope Clement VII sends letter to Moscow repeated with the same proposal.

Ivan the Terrible is tempted Possevino Antonio — the papal legate and the first Jesuit, officially arrived in Moscow. Terrible handed ornate book about the Union of Florence, he promised Tsar grad throne, if he recognizes the primacy of the pope, "If you be joined by faith with the Pope and all the princes, then with the help of not only going to his paternal grandparent, in Kiev, but to do Emperor of Constantinople and all the East ". [10] On the sly temptation Roman Byzantine throne Ivan the Terrible replied: "As for the Eastern Empire, the Lord is the land, whom God wants, and give it to her. I've had enough, and their state, and other large states in the whole world does not want ". [11] Therefore, the introduction of an oath on the rejection of the Greeks in the highest hierarchs of the Russian Church in 1480, there was another motive.

Oath violated when Dimitri when actually elected Greek Patriarch Ignatius — Uniates, later escaped with the Poles …

Klyatvootstupniki

Having failed to adults Ruric, "dilute" the 16-year old managed Alexei Mikhailovich Romanov, whose grandfather, Fyodor Romanov, openly collaborated with the Polish invaders, being "relative" of the First and Dimitri "betrothed patriarch" with Dimitri Second. Then, "officially" becoming Patriarch Filaret, and became an official with the rank of co-ruler of the "Great Emperor" with his son Tsar Mikhail Romanov, the first of the Romanov dynasty. Motivational essence that will entice the young Tsar Alexei, committed schism, articulated in 1938 in a lecture to students of the Paris theological institute known Russian historian and theologian A.V.Kartashev: "The task of the Third Rome, the head of the young king Alexis conceived a dream free from orthodox Turks in Constantinople and enter basileus of Orthodoxy, and his friend the Patriarch Nikon — celebrate the liturgy in St. Sophia, led four other patriarchs. To do this quickly to agree on all the books and rites of the Greek. Started illiterate and tactless breaking … "[12].

In this case, the historian of the Russian Church N.F.Kapterev had emphasized: "… the initiative to make the reform of the Church, in the sense of combining our church officials, the rites and liturgical books with the then Greek, does not belong to Nikon and Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich and his confessor — archpriest Stefan Vonifatevichu . They are the first, before Nikon, conceived to make church reform … outlined its general character and start … putting it into execution, and they are brought up to Nikon to Moscow from Kieva knowledgeable Greek spravschikov book with which Nikon has already started to fix our books the Greek and, more importantly, they also created and most Nikon, as a reformer-philhellenist … Sam Nikon main problem … his patriarchate seen and represented … to release the patriarch of her overwhelming his total dependence on the state to make the patriarch … not only independent of the sovereign, and put it next to the king, as another great sovereign to subject to its control, as guardian and protectors of the eternal God's immutable laws, not just the church, but the whole of public life …

of these statements Nikon made at various times … is that Nikon produced a church … with fixes and instructions of the Board of the Eastern bishops, guided in this matter sent to him the patriarch of Constantinople Paisius of the book "The Tablet", and ancient, collected on his behalf by East, Greek books, from which we would like to do translations, on which the rights of our books … Personally, he produced exclusively ecclesiastical ritual reforms concerning church officials and ceremonies, and made them really for advice and guidance Eastern hierarchs "[ 13].

Note that for the "spravschikami" was sent to Kiev, where Ruthenia, which was under the rule of Poland, was affected by deep romanization. While Poland itself at this time economically almost completely controlled by the Jews, who from the XII century, not only headed Mint (coin typing in Hebrew), while being equated with the rights of the Polish nobility, but also to give birth to the King of Poland …

The sudden death of the patriarch Joseph in 1652 (which saw some signs of poisoning hemlock), launched "grekofilov" hands. Bent to "papocaesarism" imperious Nikon "given the grand idea to do from Moscow in the church on the second Byzantium." He brings to us the Greek pulpit, Greek bishop's staff, Greek hoods and robes, the Greek church chants, invites to Moscow Greek painters, building on the model of the Greek monasteries, brings to his various Greeks everywhere highlights Greek authority. [14] Estimating it blind copying Greek model named Paul Florensky activity of Patriarch Nikon of "reactionary and generally anti-national". [15] It should be noted that by 1658 Nikon broke with Tsar Alexei, and went into voluntary exile, where he began to serve in the old rite.

At the council in 1667, calling on "adopt reforms," the king gave all the business management in the hands of two Eastern patriarchs, Paisius of Alexandria and Makarios III of Antioch. Eastern patriarchs kept themselves in the cathedral as peremptory judges all Russian cases, deploying a campaign against the age-old Russian Orthodox traditions, rituals, all of last Russian life and Russian history throughout the centuries, recognizing the Russian ritual of "heretical", and next to him — "heretics" by replacing all including clothing of the clergy, "according to the Greek model." The both "patriarch" had already been deprived of their chairs decision Council of Constantinople. It is difficult to imagine that those visiting guests, receive for his visit a lot of money [16], dare sudeystvovat without direct reference customers.

Moreover, there is evidence that a visiting patriarchs threatened if they refused to perform these direct instructions. Archimandrite Dionysios — Greek, who was in Moscow, — told them the following: "If taco become to judge without the anointing, and the more you honor and charity gifts happy and not from the sovereign of Great and all authorities as tacos, but you send him to a monastery … and in their land will not let you … Patriarchs also listen and tvoriti taco steel, not arguing anything tokmo indulged "[17].

Materials used articles: D.Savvina, "Church split XVII century as the root of the next Russian troubles"), BP Kutuzov, the "Church" reform »XVII century as the ideological subversion and national disaster" (New York: ipa "three-liter", 2003, 573 s) and "According to your faith be it unto you" (Ch. "Church reforms of the late XVI century and their true objectives "), as well as:

[1] J. H. Billington, "The Icon and the Axe: The experience of interpreting the history of Russian culture» (NY., 1966 [rus. Per.: M., 2001]) (quoted by William Schmidt's article "John Billington and Patriarch Nikon : the ideology of American policy toward Slavic Russia ")

[2] Kostomarov, "Russian history in the lives of its most important figures"

[3] Vodovozov NV, "The history of ancient Russian literature", Moscow, 1966, c.351

[4] For some time after the conquest of Constantinople by the Ottoman Jews, according to one Turkish instruments, is seventeen quarters of the capital, … stretched along the shore of Golden Horn … The other group quarters are situated near Adrianople gate. In the XVI century the Jews have firmly established themselves in Bahchekapy that the Turks began to call this place … Chifut-kapysy (Jewish Gate). At the end of the XVII century, the Jews are the majority of residents in neighborhoods sectors Balat, Ayazmakapysy, Ayvansaray, Jabali, Tekfursaray. On the northern shores of the Golden Horn are very numerous in the Huskies, Kasim Pasha, Galati and Mumhane. On the Bosphorus can be found in Beshik Tash, Ortaköy and Kuzgundzhuke Usyuodare … Jews … occupy many positions. They are in some corporations acted intermediaries between the Turks and the "Franks", many of them bankers and big merchants, and their scope of activity covers both domestic and international trade. They have a large number of employed in the liberal professions — especially a lot of them in medicine. By the same token, the first printing press in Constantinople, founded in 1490, was Jewish, as its founders were Jews of Spanish-Portuguese origin … Michelle Febyur, not really their zhaluyuschy, was able to write: "… They have made it necessary for all. You can not find such a respectable family of a Turkish or among foreign merchants, which does not penetrate to the Jew, providing a variety of services to her … despite the hostility felt by this people "

[5] The course of lectures at the Moscow Theological Seminary history of the Russian Church. 1970 (quoted in the article mentioned above, BP Kutuzov "Church" reform »XVII century as ideological subversion and national disaster")

[6] Met. Macarius (Bulgakov), "History of the Russian Church", 1996. Kn.6. Vol.10. P.93

So "in strict compliance" with the plan, "called from abroad" Likhud brothers, inmates Jesuit colleges Venice and Padua, claimed Nikonov-Alekseevskogo "reform", being at least 15 years (until 1701), headed the Moscow Theological Academy …

[7] Met. Macarius (Bulgakov), "Orthodox dogmatic theology", St. Petersburg., 1890, pp.54-56

[8] Archpriest Nikolai Novosad, "Orthodoxy in Western Russia in the sixteenth and seventeenth century. face Uniatism "Report on the 2nd International Church conference in Moscow on May 11, 1987

[9] Metropolitan Macarius (Bulgakov), "History of the Russian Church", vol.8. SPb., 1877, p.383

[10] Ibid, c.390

[11] "Ivan the Terrible and the Jesuits: Antonio Possevino mission in Moscow", comp. Igor Kurukin, Agraf, 2005

[12] AV Kartashov, "" Holy Russia "in the ways of Russia. / / Reconstruction of Holy Russia ", Moscow, 1991. P.42-43

[13] S.M.Solsky, "Review of books on Bible study in Russia in XV century to the present time", 1869

[14] Kapterev, "Patriarch Nikon and Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich," Sergiev Posad, 1912. vol.1, p.45.

[15] Florenskiy.P.A. "Trinity-Sergius Lavra and Russia. Selected works of art. " , 1996. p.231.

[16] SA Zenkovsky, "Russian Old Believers: The Spiritual Movement of the seventeenth century", Ch. 28. Cathedral Patriarchs 1666-1667 period

[17] L. Titova, "Message deacon Fyodor son Maxim. Christianity and the Church in Russia feudal period (material) ", Novosibirsk, 1989. p.128

Ideological "stretching"

Meanwhile, the ideological basis of the documents and the Councils 1666-1667 years, the subject of which was the final discussion of the "liturgical reform" were developed:

— scholar monk Bazilian "Latin" wing Simeon (aka Samuel Sitnyanovich — "pretty mediocre … pedant, or scribe, but very clever, quirky, and disputes in everyday affairs, who managed to become highly and firmly in a puzzled Moscow society" [18] );
— "Metropolitan Gaza" Paisii Ligaridom (adventurer, agent Jesuit priests ordained in uniate Raphael Korsak. Was excommunicated by the Patriarch of Jerusalem Nektarios, successor Paisius of Jerusalem. Believed that Paisios Ligarid has advised Alexis invite two weaned "patriarchs" in Moscow);
— aforementioned Greek Dionysius (Archimandrite Iver Athos monastery, who is in Moscow at the time of the organization of the Schism (1655-1669), who threatened to retired Eastern patriarchs, causing them to "make the right decision") …

Patriarch Nikon at this Council, as hesitated and "not justified confidence" during the "modernization of Orthodoxy" deprived of the patriarchal dignity, episcopal rank and exiled to Belozersky monastery. Alex at the meeting of the cathedral was not present, but later he headed the "Reformation."

Notably, in 1666 the same year the king a special message to Athos asked me to send him a "Code of Law" and "all the king's official rank of the pious kings of old Greek," which he apparently needed for the practical preparations for the expected coronation of the Byzantine throne, to which would begin immediately after the final approval of the "reform." And there is no need to talk about "political naivete" and for Dementia Alexis, who marked all of its activities. Since its foreign broker John Gebdonu king gave instructions: send abroad "masters such, to know how to make all sorts of birds singing and walking, and bowed, and said, as in comedy delaettsa" or "podkopschikov good, what would undermine able to carry through the water … "[19]. Fantastic views of the "wonders of Western culture" and "the power of a comprehensive" master stranger, the neglect of the country's history and culture, and even more will develop and show up at his son, Tsar Peter I, brought up in the same … Samuel Polotsk

Meanwhile, the whole situation is not difficult to see the "classical stretch" — Tsar Alexis seduced a dream that he can become the head of the See of Constantinople. Nikon seduced by the same motive that can be accomplished through Moscow Universal Church Administration. None of this was done. But in the game on the vanity of the rulers of the state and the church, which prevent a split in the country, was published by the Moscow Bible.

Characteristically, "philhellenist" Nikon to the very text book fixes direct relationship had not, and could not have. Since Nikon does not know the Greek language, could not read Greek books, therefore, he could not follow the patch with the "Greek books" that inevitably the whole thing was to trust "spravschikam."

"Edit" from the evil one

In the minds of most of the reasons for the split of the Russian Church were in the "small changes in translation, making religious ceremonies more understandable." "Is that clear?" Compare for yourself — the old text: "… our Lord Jesus Christ … He granted us by his cross honest driving out vsyakago adversary." New text "… and gave us his cross you honestly driving out vsyakago adversary." What is better when "we you" is only complete bezsmyslitsa …

So really for the sake of "such trivialities" Orthodox fled to the forests, underwent torture and ascended to the fire, as Habakkuk? No, they opposed the heretical influences and obvious blasphemy "spravschikov." As an example — the prayers of Chin's baptism, where "spravschiki" mock swing. Old text: "… we pray to you, O Lord, but below snidet baptized with the spirit of the evil one." New text: "Yes snidet below to baptize, pray thee, evil spirit." Nearly two centuries, this "error" was working on a split, "the spirit of the evil one pray," — said the Old Believers as novoobryadtsy did not return to the "donikonovskomu" version …

In the same: "It is forbidden minute devil, our Lord Jesus Christ to the world and prishedyi vselivyisya to men." New text: "God forbid you, the devil, having come into the world and vselivyysya to men." Blasphemous substitution of meanings! Novoobryadtsy returned to donikonovskomu option only Missal, published in 1979.

More. Old version: "And imagine thy Christ in at poroditisya holy baptism of my unworthiness" — the words spoken by the priest at the ceremony of baptism, emphasizing his humility. New: "… although my poroditisya okayanstvom." It turns out that baptism as a symbol of birth new spiritual man, is not in a humble means of the priest, but from his okayanstva!

Sabotage "spravschikov" is not passed and most texts of Scripture. Only one of the most egregious examples of this "right." On the old one the Epistles of St. Paul the Apostle to the Colossians: "And you are the dead who were in trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh soozhivil there with him, washing off the sins of us all" (Col. 2:13), pravschiki gave the following version: "… there is soozhivil with Him, giving us all the sins. " Such a replacement can be seen in the prayer of St. Ephraim the Syrian, where instead of the former in the old text, "the spirit of discouragement and neglect, avarice, and idle otzheni from me" malicious "spravschiki" painted "… the spirit of sloth, despondency, and idle lyubonachaliya give me not. " "Avarice" is clearly derived from the sins, but those declared respect for "the senior on the situation?"

In one of the new versions of the prayer service canon guardian angel appeared, "smart pigs life passions do" when the previously mentioned as "pigs unreasonable."

Get a grasp carefully, from the above examples, of which there are many more. [20] Everyone can see: the problem is clearly not in the "little things." Church "reform» XVII century gave impunity to mock the church. "Reform" was the ideological deviation leading to abuse and fracture Russian Matrix.

In his writings, Professor. ND Assumption conclusively proved that the samples were to correct the modern Greek liturgical books published mainly in the Jesuit printing in Venice and Paris. To hide this fact, "pravschiki" falsifying, wrote in the preface of some books, that the correction is carried out to "the ancient Greek and Slovenian" samples (missal ed. 1655). [21]

Arseny Sukhanov among a large number (498) of manuscripts, acquired in the East, brought to Moscow, only 7 (seven!) manuscripts that can be used for correction of the books [21]. His journey was nothing but a smokescreen of "reformers."

Tragicomic stories "edit" in the fact that six years Nikonov patriarchate came six editions of the Service, raznoglasyaschih each other, "and the difference between the editions we have seen not only in a few lines, but sometimes the page into two or more" [22] . With an increasing number of publications in books contradictions not only did not decrease, but increased more …

In the XIX century. N.Kapterev historian Orthodoxy, located in the chief prosecutor's censorship, wrote of the "Edit" and "spravschikah" very softly, "Arseny, as a foreigner, a Greek, not so mastered the Russian language to understand all its subtleties … Epiphany Slavinetsky … known as a supporter of the extreme literalism in translation, it is a sacrifice of literalism brings clarity and intelligibility of the speech itself, wrote their own words and their combinations are very artificial and inexpressive, just to be closer to the original, which made his translations are always awkward, often obscure and poorly understood, so that the meaning of some of our church song and now hardly digestible ". [22]

So who were actually "spravschiki" and what impact has this "scientific intelligence" to "human technology"?

"The Old Testament Hypostasis" from the Jesuit Uniate and "kike obrezantsev"

"And the summer of 1674 Alexis decreed, and received the blessing of the Holy Council on translation of the Old and New Testament Bible and instructed Hieromonk Epiphany Slavinetsky (student Jesuit colleges *) with Greek books printed in Frankfurt (the birthplace of the Rothschild-Schiff *), in 1597 in London in 1600, and other publications in 1587 was entrusted to Paul Discipline — Metropolitan Sarskaja and podonskomu. But hardly corrected New Testament, as Metropolitan Paul died, 2 months and died Slavinetsky "[24].

Master of Theology S.A.Belokurov found and published the manuscript Archimandrite Sylvester Medvedev (pupil Semion Polotsk-Samuel), who worked on the Moscow printing house from 1677 to 1688. The situation in correcting the Service in 1655, was as follows: "… the Patriarch Nikon, starting to correct the Service, meant to edit it on the basis of ancient Greek and Slavic manuscripts, corresponding to the solution of the cathedral in 1654," that henceforth recommended correction in print stamping Divine Books harateynyh against ancient and Greek books, manuals, potrebnikov, missals and Book of Hours. " In fact, the correction of the Service is "the novopechatnyh in German Greek books", and the books have not been verified by the ancient Greek and Slavic manuscript, on the contrary, the latter "were black opposes novopechatnyh in German Greek books" (!) … Spravschiki in some cases, simply cross out manuscripts in the places that they seemed to contradict novopechatnym books ". [25]

Belokurov found in the library of the Moscow Synodal Press that "in German Greek bezsvidetelstvovannuyu printed book", wrote about Sylvester Medvedev. It was unchecked by any "Greek prayer book" Venetian (!) Edition in 1602 should be noted that it was in Venice was one of the largest Jewish ghetto in Europe and here, in the printing D.Bomberga, in 1520, was first printed Talmud (hence also went and Social sect, which we'll cover in the next section, and it is this "sect Venetians", according to Lyndon LaRouche and H.Grehema Lowry, initially took control of the Bank of England [25a]).

Similarly, in 1663, and published "The Moscow Bible", which is repeated so-called "Ostrog Bible," with "more specific information by Hebrew and Greek texts." Characteristically, the transfers were made by the same Jews prone to direct proselytizing. Note that Nikon tried to fight with him. One more thing before his exile, he wrote to the king: "Yes, I have also had two in Voskresenskom Zhidovinov, baptized in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. And from teh Jews is one, his name Domiyan, leaving hristiyanskuyu Orthodox holy faith, Poch under the old law to keep a Jewish faith and holy postov hraniti not, and in all the positions of meat yasti and young cherntsov corrupt, for chevo, de, you will not get married and do not eat meat, young, de, are, and all sorts of other zhydovskim custom. And about evo, Demyankov Jew, committed knows me, and I find a surety that really corrupted by the Orthodox holy hristiyanskiya faith and velel evo, Domiyanka, posmiryat Yverskoy and sent to a monastery. Both Demyanko another Jew, Bear said, "Do not try, de, and you no harm, in fact, de, and you is the same run, de, to Moscow and say, de, for themselves sovereign word." And he ran to Moscow, said behind me yours, of Great Emperor, the word. "

But as it is not trying to fight with Nikon outspoken Jewish proselytism, in general, the whole "its reform" occurred under the influence of the unofficial "monk of Jewish origin" Arseny Greek — pupil Jesuit College in Rome, has repeatedly passed from Orthodoxy to Catholicism, Uniate and back Mohammedanism was taking, and "is aware that the circumcised" only under the threat of physical examination.

"In Moscow it was a Puritan abomination … from a rich family, he studied at the Greek school in Venice and then in Rome, at the College of St. Unitarian. Athanasius. After 5 years of the Roman College, of course, bought at the cost of betrayal faith, Arseny took Padua University in philosophy and medicine. Returning home, he again became Orthodox and began to move around to the bishopric. But the Turkish government … in jail … had converted to Islam and cropped. Released from prison and fled to Wallachia, then in Poland and Kiev, looking professorial in there Mohyla Collegium. In 1649 passed through Kiev to Moscow Patriarch of Jerusalem Pais. To him volunteered Arseny. And he took him to Moscow as a teacher of Greek … (the true biography of Arseniy Paisios wrote to Moscow only on the way *) … Greeks took to court. Arseny first tried lock, and then confessed. He was sentenced to a correctional link to the Solovetsky Monastery … Arseniy rescued … coming summer 1652 Met. Nikon Novgorod for the relics of St. Philip. Nikon took Arseniy back to Moscow and immediately put him on the patriarchal court for teaching in Greco-Latin at school … Miracle Monastery. A year later and became Arseny spravschikom books with other spravschikami Nikonov time … Euphemia, who knew Greek, Latin, Hebrew, and Polish … In 1652, he took all the Nikon Printing House … in his office, he appointed spravschikov and began vigorously promote the cause of changes printed books … Euthymius the rounds … and traveled thirty-nine visited monasteries … 2.672 books and made them write them. All these books Nikon ordered to send to Moscow. Arseny Greek was instructed to go for books in Novgorod and Kiev … Sukhanov purchased 498 books on Mt. 200 books sent Eastern Patriarchs. But with this new texts enrichment Moscow Center spravschikov work and printing of books do not think … "[26].

We have already said that of 498 books purchased monk Arseny Sukhanov, only seven were used, and that "with the famous stretch." But this time his namesake — Arseniy Greek, "heretic, a Jesuit, Bessermen, obrezanets Jews'" [26], did much to destroy the Slavic books and introduce "new translations" of the Bible.

"It belonged to Arsenius had resulted in tragedy for the Russian Orthodox Church to spread the idea of using the corrected books violence. Main institution book reform henceforth notorious secret orders. New books were published in the printed and delivered to the court at all, even the most distant of the diocese. At this time, Arseny traveled to Russia and with archers arranged these raids. In the night they broke into churches and monasteries, and scraped clean of all old books, which are then burned in public "[27].

At this point in Russian Orthodoxy to the New Testament joins the Old Testament edited so that the events of the Gospel began to correspond to "the prophecy written Torah." So there was a successful attempt to create a "unity" between fundamentally different doctrines. So the plan worked "scribes" who have created chaos and confusion used, dragged "twin" the Bible to spread the corruption of "Tanakh" [28]. It is not accidental that the Patriarch Nikon, when he was in self-imposed exile, he returned to the old, pre-reform rite of worship …

Note that only one and a half centuries earlier on the same principle is the spread of "the Old Testament values" and in Europe, especially in Protestant countries, where Luther translated into German, not only the Gospel (in 1517), but also the Old Testament [29] together with Philip Melanchthon in 1523. However, his friend John Calvin — the creator of the most aggressive version of Protestantism and translator "Swiss" version of the Bible — was initially admitted to the Jewish yeshiva, that even in today's times is practically impossible to implement. "It is not a Jew (goyim, battery) that will interest the laws of the Jews, or study them — is worthy of death" (other version translation of the "goy who izuchaet law, (chitaet St. Pisanie) dostoin death») (Sanchedin, 59a; Aboda Zara , 8b).

Where such unusual "privilege"? The fact that Calvin's mentor (and a relative of Melanchthon) was a Hebraist and Kabbalist Johann Reuchlin. Reuchlin, received unofficial title of "Father of the Reformation", offered to open in every German university in two departments of Hebrew …

Thus, the systematic mass falsification of the Old Testament (in Judaism which is called the Tanakh, rarely Torah) and tight garter him to the New Testament took place at about the same time.

to be continued …

_______________

[18] Fr. Florovsky, "Ways of Russian Theology," Paris, 1937, page 75

[19] Zaozersky AI, "The Tsar's patrimony of the seventeenth century", Moscow, 1937. c.146

[20] BP Kutuzov, "Church" reform »XVII century as the ideological subversion and national disaster", Moscow, 2003, as well as Fr. AI Nevostruev, prof. MD Muretov, prof. NI Ilminsky, prof. ND Assumption, prof. BI Sauve, Professor, Fr. I. Belevtsev etc.

[21] Assumption ND "The collision of two theologies in correcting the Russian liturgical books in the seventeenth century. / / Theological Works." Moscow, 1975. № 13

[21] S. Belokurov, "Arseny Sukhanov," (Master's thesis), MA, 1891. Pp. 352-416

[22] A. Dmitriev, "Feedback Op. MI Orlov's "Liturgy of St.. Basil the Great, "", St. Petersburg., 1911. P.256-257 (tsitat. for Assumption ND "The collision of two theologies in correcting the Russian liturgical books in the seventeenth century. / / Theological Works," Moscow, 1975. № 13)

[23] Kapterev, Vol.1, p.245

* Note martinis09

[23] SM Solsky, said material

[25] cited. on the work of Dr. Orthodox history, prof. N.D.Uspenskogo, "Collision of two theologies in correcting Russian liturgical books in the XVII century"

[25a] H. Graham Lowry, "Leibniz and Swift against the Venetians," Schiller Institute of Science and Culture, Bulletin № 4 (4)

[26] A.V.Kartashov, "Essays on the History of the Russian Church. Volume 2 "

[27] cvyasch. Eugene Gordeychik, "The Great Emperor Nikon:" Cathedral judged me patriarchs I put in anything … »»

[28] randomly Croatian Yuri Krizhanich — Uniate remaining Slavophile and became the "father of comparative Slavic Studies," in his book "Politics", wrote: "If the Russian kingdom ever dies, it will take the death of these Perekrestov or their descendants. Or, perhaps, they possess our kingdom to shame our entire family. They will blend [us] by the blood, but not for ever be united [us] together in [their] aspirations. Grandchildren Perekrestov have other thoughts than the indigenous natives of [the country]. "

Israeli historian Savely Dudakov, in his book "The History of a Myth: Essays on Russian Literature XIX-XX centuries": "But who is meant Yuri Kryzhanich? Who are these vykresty, held a prominent position in the administration of Alexis? Undoubtedly, one of them was a secretary to the Duma clerk Diamond I. … do not know a date of birth clerk or his real name, only a few names and nicknames … In his youth he had been in the East — in Turkey and Persia, learned Oriental languages … negotiated without an interpreter. In 1640 he was appointed clerk breech order, and in 1649 he was transferred to the Ambassadorial order. As a part of the Russian embassy in 1649 went to Stockholm to sign the contract record. In the 1652-1653 years. — A member of the delegation of the embassy to the Polish king Jan Kazimierz. In 1653 he received the title Dumnaya clerk and was appointed head of the Ambassadors of the order, which he held until 1667 at the same time (since 1653) ran The printed order. " Jewish origin "pet Alexis" no doubt … It seems that in order to work the Embassy and other vykresty Jewish … So, the Russian ambassador in Kakheti was V.S.Zhidovin and clerks clerk — Basil Yudin of the "guests", t . is of merchants. Finally, the head of the Moscow musketeers (position, in modern terms, higher commander of the Moscow Military District) was Ivan Zhidovinov. Thus, the "dominance" of the Jews (even vykrestov) at the court of Alexis, according to Yu Kryzhanicha become "dangerous" … "

[29] separately, we note that it was not only ideological, but also a commercial product. Given that the initial price of the book is 1.5 gold guilders (at the time of 8 guilders could live the whole year), the demand for Luther's translation was so great, that before his death in 1546 came thirteen editions. Wittenberg book printer Hans Luft from 1534 to 1584 approximately 100,000 printed Bibles — a huge draw for its time.

Like this post? Please share to your friends: