Belarus earlier requested that her claim for consideration in relation to the duty on Russian oil was convened plenum of the Economic Court of the CIS.
According to BelaPAN, the court said in a statement that, in accordance with the agreement on the establishment of the Eurasian Economic Community, the rules of production and handling of cases in the Economic Court and the organization of its activities are defined by statute.
"Articles of Association, in contrast to the situation of the Economic Court of the CIS, is not provided in the structure of the EurAsEC Court plenum and provides that the court's decision is final community" — said in a press release.
CIS Economic Court also stated: "Due to the proliferation of different information in the media in the case of the Economic Court officials are not authorized to make any statement or comment on pending cases, in including on the procedure for their consideration. "
Recall, June 29, 2010 in the CIS Economic Court received a petition from the Ministry of Justice to possible soon convene a plenum, and to consider the Government's suspension of the collection of duties on Russian oil products.
June 24, 2010 during a status conference Economic Court rejected the application of the Belarusian side motion for a temporary ban on collection of Russian duties on oil supplied to Belarus, to vyrashennya dispute on the merits. We are talking about the lawsuit, which the Ministry of Justice of Belarus addressed to the Economic Court on March 25.
June 24 board of the CIS Economic Court appointed the next court hearing on the lawsuit the government of Belarus to Russia about the illegality of levying duties on petroleum products in the September 7. In the next two months, the court did not will work because of seasonal (holiday) break.