Drought or ice: global warming is proved




What you look at, change your world forever, I promise you. I'm sorry I had to be the bearer of these alarming news, but if you want to survive, you have to know what we expect or drought and heat or ice and freezing.

Over 40 years, we have heard in the news about global warming, and by now we have become quite careless. Our scientists have reached a consensus that global warming will cause significant changes and challenges in the world, but from their point of view, it will take 50-100 years before we really have to deal with these consequences.

It is generally accepted that global warming will be slow, and that the world will be time to find a solution problems.

Important new evidence suggests that this belief is simply wrong, and that we had better prepare for another, more rapid development of events.


One of the first indications that all may not be exactly as we say (especially in the U.S.) was published in the magazine "Discovery» (Discovery) in September 2002, the cover of which reads: "Surprise of global warming — a new ice age", "oceanographers found in the Atlantic huge flow of fresh water, which is formed by the melting of ice at the North Pole. They warn that this flow may soon break the Gulf Stream and to condemn the North America and Europe in the cold winter. "

It was almost two years ago and no one listened to it not. Life goes its own way, and the huge looming danger of not paying any attention.


Then, in January 2004, appears on the stage, Sir David King. Sir King is the leading scientific adviser to the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. Sir King has asked for Mr Blair, told him of the impending global catastrophe and said he needed to tell the world about what should happen.

Tony Blair told David King to remain silent and not to disclose this information. But Mr. King believed that this information is too important to remain silent, so in January of this year, he deliberately bypassing Mr Blair appealed directly to the American magazine "Science» (Science), where he published his information and shared his anxiety.

In this article, Sir David King writes: "From my point of view, climate change is the greatest challenge we face today, more serious even than the threat of international terrorism."

In England, Sir David King has been ordered to shut up, and now he is not even allowed to speak publicly on the subject under the threat of imprisonment.


A month later, in February 2004, the Pentagon was involved in the case, which prompted the world to action.

The Pentagon has for many years studied the global warming due to problems of national security that may result from changes in the world, linked to global warming.

One of the divisions of the Pentagon, the Office of the total score (Office of Net Assessment), special study was conducted. At the head of this department is 83-year-old Andrew W. Marshall (Andrew W. Marshall), is responsible for the identification of threats that can expect the United States.

Mr. Marshall turned to being in the U.S. association of scientists, which is called the "Global Business Network» (Global Business Network), to determine all the possible consequences of global warming and to identify which of them will affect the national security. In October 2003, a study was conducted in which the problem is considered from the point of view of the worst of what can happen. Results of the study were referred to the Pentagon under the title "The scenario of abrupt climate change and its implications for the national security of the United States." The findings went far beyond the expectations of most experts Pentagon.

Recognizing the exceptional importance of this study, Mr. Marshall decided to present this information and the attention of the American people. Perhaps because of the attitude of President Bush's policy on global warming (and it is more than a negative), Mr. Marshall also decided to bypass the President and published the information available to him and expressed his concern about the magazine "Fortune» (Fortune) for February 9, 2004 year.

In his article in this magazine, Mr. Marshall explains that the melting ice of the North and South poles and glaciers around the world fresh water is produced and this is the basis of our global weather threatens disaster.

The Gulf Stream, or to put it in scientific terms, the North Atlantic thermohaline conveyor, — a stream of warm water, which is on the surface of the ocean from the southern to the northern hemisphere, and thanks to North America, and Northern and Western Europe do not freeze. It also supports most of the weather patterns in the accustomed order.

Then, when the Gulf Stream cools, it sinks to the bottom of the ocean and the ocean as the flow returns to the south, where it is heated again, rises to the surface in a continuous convection flow returns to the north. It's a giant three-dimensional figure eight.

Engine that supports over this warm water is in the north, where the Gulf Stream flows to the bottom of the ocean. The concentration of salt in the ocean causes the flow to drop, it also raises the warm water from the south.

Now that the polar ice is melting and fresh water flows into the Atlantic Ocean, the concentration of salt in the ocean is reduced, the Gulf Stream does not fall so deep, and the result for slowing down. A significant slowdown in the Gulf Stream has been occurring for at least ten years.

As the Gulf Stream slows down, the heat does not reach to the North Atlantic region, and start changing weather models, the balance of which maintained the flow of heat.


During the reign of Bush

During the reign of President Bush, when there was a discussion of melting ice at the North and South Pole, the government and U.S. corporations in one voice said that the world's scientists are absolutely wrong in his conclusions about the existence of great danger. This led the American public to believe that no problem is actually not.

However, George W. Bush was criticized in an article by Sir David King in the journal "Science" as the greatest scientific minds in the world, at least, one thousand seven hundred of them, who are members of the Union of Concerned Scientists, said that Mr. Bush at As poorly informed.

Since the share of the U.S. government is responsible for 25% of CO2, cause global warming policy debate Mr. Bush on global warming is of paramount importance. One of the best articles that summarize the position of Mr. Bush, can be found in the magazine "Rolling Stones» (Rolling Stones) on May 19, 2004. Its author — Tim Dickinson (Tim Dickinson). The following excerpt is highlighted in this article.

Taking into account the looming danger of global warming, even the Bush administration would be expected that it will start a war against the heat. In the end, as a presidential candidate in 2000, George W. Bush vowed to "establish binding rules to reduce the" carbon dioxide emissions, saying that this issue will be allocated to the highest priorities.

However, when Bush became president, the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions was the first promise he broke — and from this point on the list of undeserving cases continued to grow. Just two months after taking office, the administration withdrew from the Kyoto Protocol — an international treaty signed by the United States in 1997 for imposing severe restrictions emissions that cause the greenhouse effect. Instead, Bush has introduced a voluntary emission reduction plan that failed miserably: currently only fourteen companies have pledged to reduce their emissions of CO2.

In addition, the President has introduced an inter-ministerial group in charge of monitoring climate change in the Department of Commerce, which is headed by the Secretary Don Evans, who dealt with earlier oil and gas. Bush called for more research in climate that pushed the adoption of any significant legislation has at least ten years. "We do not know how the climate may change or may change in the future," — Bush said in a speech in the Rose Garden. Such statements have led to an open letter signed by twenty Nobel Prize winners that hit the administration publicly criticized for "systematic attempts to undermine the" public understanding of the human role in global warming. (Bush's science adviser declined to be interviewed for the present article.)

Then came the censorship. In September 2002, the Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency — EPA) published a report on the quality of air, which (for the first time since 1996) did not mention global warming. Seven months later, the White House is completely redid the chapter on climate change in EPA compiled the "Report on the state of the environment," downplaying the human impact by removing the reference to the impact of global warming on health and inserting climate data collection which is partially funded by the American Petroleum Institute. EPA excludes changes head, pointing to the internal memo that the head "no longer corresponds to the generally accepted scientific point of view on the issue of climate change."

Even some Republicans were shocked by Bush's intervention in the affairs of the EIA. "Constantly pursued by George W. Bush, the line seemed to reflect the expectation that the EPA will follow the White House on the legal regulation — said Russell Train, who headed the Office under Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford. — When I was in charge control, nothing like that happened. Not once. " Train, received from the senior Bush the Presidential Medal of Freedom, calls the administration's attitude toward global warming "totally wrong" and "irresponsible."

Bush can rely on key Republicans in Congress and to block any attempt to reduce pollution and to prevent the disaster. Senator James Inhofe, chairman of the Committee on the Environment and the public rejects global warming as a "hoax." In a speech in July last year, Inhofe compared the Inter-Governmental Commission on Climate Change (IPCC — Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) with the Soviet Union and extolled the virtues of the world, "thanks to the developing CO2. " In conclusion, he said: "I very much hope that Congress refused to those who predict doom and disseminates propaganda masquerading as science, ratuyuschuyu to save the planet from disaster."

From another point of view, in the same article we read: "They (the Bush administration) has no credible plan to address the problem (global warming) or within the United States or internationally, — says Michael Oppenheimer, a climate scientist at Princeton University. — They (the Bush administration) are appealing to the fact that they do not want to deal with global warming, because, as he says, 'the point of view of science unfounded'. But this approach is untenable, because the position of science there is reason to. "

The melting of the North Pole

Let's look at the facts. Two summers ago for the first time in the known history of the North Pole completely melted. Both private and military vessels actually swam right over the North Pole, as there was only water. This region had never seen less than thirty meters (ten feet) of solid ice.

A few years ago, the organization "Greenpeace" has announced that the snow pack (ice pack) at the North Pole from winter to summer decreased by about 480 kilometers (three miles), but no one listened to it not.

And now, as I write this article, Alaska burns a fire that destroyed more than four hundred thousand hectares (one million acres) of forest. It is burning in an area that until now has been constantly wet due to rain or snow. And the fire, as you will see from this article, is directly linked to the melting of the poles and the Gulf Stream.

But in the end thanks to Andrew Marshall, the Pentagon told the truth in the magazine "Fortune" for February 9, 2004. Pentagon gives satellite pictures of the North Pole in 1970 and 2003, which show that, according to the Pentagon, just over 33 years, the North Pole has melted by 40%. And now it melts faster and faster. Now the Pentagon has proved that all government statements that the poles are not melting, were simply lies. And this lie is more harmful than anything that could bring the United States unleashed by Bush's war with Iraq.

The melting of the South Pole

At the South Pole a few years ago broke Larsen Ice And that surprised many scientists. While academia have told us that studying this event, and that there is nothing particularly outstanding because this ice shelf was connected to the South Pole is only in the last ten thousand years.

The same researchers added that the Larsen Ice B, located at the glacier Larsen A, never melt because it has existed for many ice ages. However, last year the Larsen B ice shelf broke off and floated away into the ocean. Those scholars said that it will melt in the six months since its dimensions are huge, but they were wrong again. It melted in just 35 days and, more importantly, as a result of the global sea level rose by nearly two and a half centimeters (inches).

Now, when the Larsen B ice no longer exists, another giant ice shelf, the Ross Ice remained unprotected. The only thing that did not give the Ross Ice float away into the ocean, was the Larsen Ice B. According to the information from my sources in the Ross Ice is now a crack.

If the Ross Ice goes into the ocean, it is estimated that global sea levels will rise by 5-6 meters (16-20 feet). And that, my friends, will change the world, because almost all the coastal cities of the world and many of the islands, as well as the territory of the Netherlands, will be under water. You may need an event like this, so that the world woke up and began seriously to global warming.

Remote past

1300 BC. e.

The Pentagon in its study of the phenomena occurring now in the North Atlantic Ocean, turned in time to see when going before slowing or stopping the Gulf Stream and how it has changed in the weather on the planet.

In fact, such a slowing or stopping of ocean currents in the North Atlantic, there were hundreds of times in the past on the continuation of hundreds of millions of years, but for us in the near past, over the last 10,000 years, they only occurred twice.

The last time this happened in 1300 BC. e., and then it was only a slowdown. At the time, for never stopped. Scientists do not know why there was this delay, and now are building various theories as to its cause.

The results were dramatic slowing global changes in climate and weather that could not get back to normal over the next 550 years. This period of our history is called the Little Ice Age because of its devastating effects on the weather, as well as a strong cold snap.

The Pentagon has become clear that during the Little Ice Age on the east coast of America was bitterly cold, while the central and western regions of the United States have become so dry that the Midwest region has turned into dust storms, mountain forests completely burnt out — as well as they burn out we do not have days because slowing the Gulf Stream continues today for about ten years. Impact on Europe was also huge, as the weather at the time of the Little Ice Age has changed completely and there.

Interesting information can be gleaned from the study on the Anasazi Indians in the XIV century. At Chaco Canyon in New Mexico Anasazi completely disappeared, and where they went, nobody knows. Environmental Studies New Mexico have shown that one of the reasons for their departure from the area was the fact that shortly after the beginning of XIV century in the Chaco Canyon drought began, and in 47 years there has not dropped a single drop of rain! 47 years of drought will force anyone to change their place of residence. No water — no life.

Archaeologists who conducted the study, did not know why the drought began, but her reasons are clear, if you know that immediately before that period the Gulf Stream slowed down its course. This, according to the Pentagon, now threatens America, Canada and Europe.

We may think that the current drought in the western United States will soon be over, but the story of the existence of the Gulf Stream in the world tend to believe that it will continue for another forty years before the balance will be restored.

8200 years ago

However, the Pentagon report said that the facts speak not just about slowing down, and the upcoming stop the Gulf Stream. The last time it stopped over 8200 years ago.

The Pentagon, based on his research, says that this scenario is far more dramatic. Shortly after the 8200 Gulf Stream stopped years ago, Northern Europe was in the 800-meter (half a mile), a layer of ice, and in New York and quickly established England's weather, like anthrax.

And then followed a true ice age, which lasted for about a hundred years, so that it becomes clear why the Pentagon is so concerned. Like Sir David King, Andrew Marshall says that the Gulf Stream is a problem for the national security of the United States (and other countries) a greater threat than terrorism, the entire world combined. And really, if you think about terrorism is nothing compared to the stop of the Gulf Stream. He does not go to any comparison.

Realize that without stable weather conditions cultivation of food crops will become almost impossible and, according to the Pentagon, in the near future, it may become so huge problem in the world, all over the world will start war over oil and power, but because of food and water.

In the event of such a development, the need arises to evacuate entire states, such as Finland, Sweden and Denmark, which will be under the ice, as well as other states for other reasons, and this will create a huge immigration greatest threat to national security — as the report says the Pentagon.

That's why Andrew Marshall and Sir David King wanted the world to know about what will happen — for the world to prepare for the inevitable.


Then, in March 2004, the U.S. Senate finally realized that the Pentagon says, and allocated $ 60 million to study rapid global climate change. It is hoped that soon the U.S. Senate will begin to tell the world about these upcoming changes to the climate.


In June 2004, the UN held a meeting on the issue of global warming and the Gulf Stream. At this meeting, which ended on June 29, was attended by 154 countries, and they were able to find a single measure: as soon as possible to stop using oil and gasoline.

Some people believe that further reductions in carbon dioxide emissions, may help to slow down the development of problems. In addition, we, of course, have to do our best. This is important as there are in every ocean currents like the North Atlantic, and if they slow down or stop, the world will almost certainly start a real ice age. History shows that in this case the heat for the next period of our civilization will start in 90,000 years.

But in fact, alter or accelerate the flow in the entire Atlantic Ocean, to return it to the "norm" is not the strength of humanity, with all its technology. According to most scientists of the world, too late to change the course of what should happen. The only thing we can do — is to prepare for shocks. Preparation is crucial — that is the main idea of how Sir David King, and Andrew Marshall.


July 13, 2004 NASA launched the first of three satellites whose sole purpose is the study of global warming. In addition to studies of the ozone layer — another huge problem of global warming — these satellites will monitor the temperature and the concentration of salt in the oceans. Maybe we can at least keep track of the rapid changes and predict what will happen next.


In March 2004, the world witnessed how powerful hurricane ravaged the coast of Brazil. In the history of the first case, when the hurricane hit land in South America.

In May 2004, just one month in the U.S. was 562 tornadoes, which broke all records. Some of these tornadoes were reported in Seattle, Washington. Seattle has never been a tornado.

Winter of 2003-2004 was one of the coldest in the history of Eastern Canada.

Around the world in a few years forest fires are burning. The list is huge. Lights north of Australia. As has been said, Alaska is on fire. This is unprecedented!

Fires spread throughout the western United States, moving from one region to another, and the U.S. government claim that it is the most severe drought in the past 500 years. Indeed, fires are worldwide.

In 2003 in France and Europe was a wave of heat, as a result, just from the intense heat, which causes — global warming and the Gulf Stream, 15,000 people died in France and 30,000 in Europe.

In Argentina, in July 2004, was the strongest storm in the history of the country.

In some regions of Mexico, the weather is so strange and wet that affects grain mold or fungus (and in other areas is drought). As the weather models will change more and more rapidly, growing food will be one of the biggest problems.

Because of global warming around the world are dying coral reefs, that is a threat to most of the islands in the oceans, including in the Pacific. Most likely, the majority of the population of the islands will sooner or later leave their place of residence, as the fresh water there will be unusable due to its mixing with the salty ocean. And they definitely have to leave if ocean levels rise.

July 16, 2004 U.S. National Public Radio reported that fifty percent of the carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere by our man-made society, settled in the oceans, and it lowers the pH to acidic. As a result, coral reefs dissolve and perish together with a huge number of other life forms in the oceans.

And this is only the problems that are the first to come to mind. If you get serious and really explore all the strange weather in the last ten years (when the Gulf Stream slowed its flow), we get a picture of the future abrupt climate changes, which we all have to adapt, if humanity is to continue to exist on earth.

12-foot wall

In the report, the Pentagon proposed to be built along the U.S. border 12-foot wall to keep out immigrants trying to escape from the problems with the weather all over the world. Assuming that the biggest problem will be food and water, the Pentagon said that because the U.S. has the money to buy food, then the United States will be able to counter this problem longer than most other countries. People will want to come here just to get food.

This is similar to a strange movie, but in fact the United States government has already started the construction of the wall between the U.S. and Mexico.


Speaking of movies, the recently released in theaters the movie "The Day After Tomorrow" is based on the information about stopping the Gulf Stream. But Hollywood is so exaggerated the effects of storms, most people considered it the conventional fiction. This is not fiction, it's actually happening, but whether it will be as shown in the film? And in a movie you have seen how the mass of Americans fled to Mexico from the extremely cold weather.

About two weeks ago I spoke with the U.S. military, which is engaged in the construction of the 12-meter-high wall. When we are talking about what happens to the Gulf Stream (the military did not know about), he exclaimed: "Ah, now I understand. The fact that the wall is quite steep on the part of Mexico, but the U.S. has steps and ladders, so that you can get over the wall into Mexico. I could not understand why the government is doing. "

Shape-shifting Gulf Stream

According to the Pentagon report, its experts believe that the Gulf Stream will stop for three to five years from October 2003. It was the most accurate assumption on which they are capable, and to put it bluntly, it was only speculation and theory.

But they did not know about changing shapes Gulf Stream, which is beginning to take place at the time of dissemination of the report. Changing the shape is the beginning of the destruction of the Gulf Stream and stop this warm current, and our civilization as we know it.

This information came to me from two sources. Both do not want to be called now, but both are world-renowned scientists.

If this is true, then all the consequences and the time frame referred to in the Pentagon report, should be moved closer to the present three to five years.

I do not know if this is true, but not trying to hide anything, I have included this information in this article. I will present real evidence, if I get them.


With this information, I do not know what to do with it, to write this article or not. However, because I love humanity and believe in him, in the end, I, like Sir David King and Andrew Marshall, I realized that I must disclose this information, because knowledge — force.

And I pray that when the time comes for us all to take vital decisions, we all turned inward, to where God dwells, and listened to the voice of his inner heart. If we believe in ourselves and in the presence of Divine guidance, we will all know exactly what to do and where to be.

May God bless us all that is to come.


Like this post? Please share to your friends: