What can be said in favor of the tarpaulin boots

What can be said in favor of the tarpaulin bootsFor many Russian democrats boots are one of the nastiest words. They are the symbol of the true military, militarism, and the inherent Russian era. And some are ready to declare it the culprit impoverishment of the people and the country, Stalinism, totalitarianism and the Gulag. After boot specifically violated the base of democracy, freedom and individual rights. Well, canvas boots and absolutely considered signs of a soldier's stupidity, ignorance sergeant, an officer's rudeness and insolence general. Well, the smell of boot comes not the most pleasant. Try to force the poetic young man from a solid family to wear boots equivalent to his humiliation, death, humiliation and deprivation of human merit.

Because boots off! Get rid of them in the army and the daily life! That's really will allow to solve many problems — in the army will be an example of how, lost roughness, rudeness and bullying. Only shoes and is best such public strolling South American fighters, but they can save Russia and the Russian army. After all, specifically the South American shoe is a fighter signs protect the freedoms and human rights, as a guarantor of democracy. Wherever South American soldier walked shoe, people began to live happily and peacefully. This Yugoslavia, Vietnam, Lebanon, Grenada, and many other countries. So the only change to the canvas boots shoes is the only way to bring order to the Russian army, the army of loons making people in military uniforms.

How true clean canvas boots

Foot bindings and boots are for many young people the first emblem of the service. All this time, he will be cut off from family, friends, the usual environment and all that it is not cheap and cute. In general, not only the soldiers, and many of the officers who came from universities, quite often with a longing gaze at the issued boots. They are convinced that the boots hopelessly outdated. Walk in their hot, they are not luxurious. But the South American shoes with the highest shafted look significantly combative, sleeker and more courageous. Well, look to the shape of shoes even more un-American. And now specifically asks the U.S. way of life for many.

Stupidly and argue — opponents have really a lot of boots. So there is nothing unusual in the fact that the modern Russian army refused to boot. If, however, some men still wear the boots, you can simply explain the existence of the poor army.

In general, if you carefully analyze these shoes as a canvas boots, you can find out a lot of new and exciting.

A lot of old officers who walked a thousand miles not one for the term of his own life specifically in boots, consider that for the substitution of boots on the shoes can vote only person who values comfort above fashion and beautiful — above practicality. Needless to say — a shame it did not sound, but so often the case with modern army and everything connected with it.

And if you look at what the guys working in the villages, geologists, who have to undergo many thousands of miles through the swamps and forests, oil workers, construction workers and many other people who have to walk a lot, and often over complex topography? What shoes are they? Yes, specifically boots. And they prefer hunters, anglers and mushroom pickers, who are able to buy expensive shoes or sneakers same? Again boots.
Someone will make the objection that such shoes wear only those who have to walk on mud, puddles and dust. Well, the way it is. But then, the fighter has to fight a war not on the floor and not on the pavement. Well, go through mud, slush and autumn blurred road and with all this, do not ruin your feet, is to know how!

What can be said in favor of the tarpaulin bootsWhat's all the same can be said about the boots and leg wrappings, if you look at them in the eyes of the expert?

At first, when wearing shoe need to have socks. Wear shoes with foot bindings simply unrealistic. But the boots can be worn with socks, and with foot bindings. Price socks significantly higher, well, they wear out faster. You must pick every fighter that size that suits him. As socks vymoknut, you immediately change them until legs were covered with calluses. But on the scale of an entire army to solve these problems is hard enough.

After stocking factories just can not force-feed an army of so many socks, what you need. Especially if read about the war. But footcloths have no size, and in addition — they can be done in a couple of minutes, just by taking a piece of at least some tissue. If footcloths soaked. You can take them to rewind the other end, then the legs will again warm and dry, while the wet edge will dry up at the ankle. So Makar, wearing leg wrappings, a fighter much less depends on the supply of organs than the fighter prefers to wear. Naturally, army clothing service will be able to more easily find the amount of tissue that needs to footcloths than socks.

What's all the same can be said about the boots? Thanks to the highest bootleg boots can protect feet from burns, injuries, and all other damages leg almost to the knee. Shoes do not boast about it. Boots also protects against moisture. Quite a walk on the wet grass in the early afternoon in normal shoes to feel — pants soaked to the knees. But the boots will protect against such problems as the wet pants. They can be forced deep puddle or a small stream.

Wear boots could be faster than shoes. Very useful is the fact that on them no laces, which are often torn

Maybe the person who has to walk alone across the floor, it will be difficult to realize and appreciate the above advantages of boots. But regular officer or soldier, whose fate has brought to the Caucasus, it is difficult to change fit to dry socks and shoes. It should keep in mind and that is wet classified not only prerequisite severe blisters, and increases the number of colds. And in this household stuff (this is not a small thing, it is not a small thing!) May be a precursor falling morale at war fighter.

That's why during the Second World War, many special on shoes have the exact same reservation from the call, as specialists, miners, steelworkers and railroad workers.

It must be admitted that the Russian fighter far not always wore boots. For example, since the time of Peter the Great to the end of the eighteenth century, the officers and soldiers wore ordinary shoes. Boots also could allow herself to only cavalry. Naturally, no one tried to challenge the pros boots. But all was clear and the fact that for the production of a pair of boots will leave as much skin as you want for 5 shoes! Therefore tried to provide all the boots at least cavalry. Priemuschestvenno it was a prerequisite overstated the threat foot cavalry — cinches quite often torn pants and stockings, seriously injuring their feet.

But, despite this, the beginning of the 19th century boots successfully ousted shoes. And they were the only shoes for the infantry and cavalry soldiers and officers up to the First World War. Then, because of the shortcomings of the skin, it was decided to change s army with boots on shoes with foot bindings. But in the 30 years of the difficulties with the shortcoming of raw materials have been resolved, and again t
he men got boots.

But during the Second World War was again the crisis with the skin and had to make the creation of shoe. And yet, by 1943 the problem was partly solved and evenly fighter to change shoes boots. As a result forgotten about shoes, preferring boots. And so it continued until 1994.

The only people who all this time wore shoes, it's seafarers. Which is understandable — they have to walk a little comparable. The pilots are also not for every day 10s km. Because they can also wear shoes. But if a fighter has to knead gryazyuka at the site week after week, after overcoming the obstacle on the go jump on tank armor — it is better to prefer boots.

Certainly, boots concede the South American shoe on the beauty and elegance. And yet you should not judge the comfort of shoes, a pair of tough fighters viewing with Schwarzenegger and Stallone.

But the South American fighters also had to assess for themselves the beauty of the shoe. From December 1944 to January 1945 (this time thoroughly described in the memoirs of U.S. General O.Bredli "The Soldier's Tale") South American fighters waged war on the territory of Europe specifically in shoes. Then, apart from combat losses, they have lost 12 thousand combatant fighter with a diagnosis of rheumatic legs. Fighter had to take out the rear.

The premise is so severe the disease was constant dampness in the shoes. As a result of these 12 thousand virtually all have been unable to continue to serve in the armed forces. Many of them were maimed for life. In late January, rheumatism legs became so severe discrepancies that South American commanders simply had no options to save the remaining fighters in the ranks. Numerous briefings were held, the purpose of which was to bring to the soldier wearing the shoe and the methods of conservation dryness. But it was too late — rheumatism distributed by the army faster plague. So one month shoes were destroyed about division.

But the recipe for salvation was so simple — boots with foot bindings.

Based on materials:

Like this post? Please share to your friends: