What happened to the Soviet Union in the 1990s and what will happen to Russia in the 2010s?

What happened to the Soviet Union in the 1990s and what will happen to Russia in the 2010s?Vserasprostraneno worldview that our motherland — the richest country in Europe. Indeed, we have the largest supplies of gas, oil and coal as the second-largest iron ore supplies. We have a large area, about 70 million working-age population, but the people of our country is practically excluded from this wealth, they are demoralized and is now almost extinct.

Gullible commoners to this day think that in the 1990s there was a shift toward liberalism (in the middle of these people have even pochetaemye and reputable scientists), but in fact, the reforms were not disguised redistribution of state property between the ruling elites. Who lost was either put in jail or simply killed. Remaining at large were forced to live and play by the new rules. And these rules lies in the fact that, under the pretext of building a democratic state was established authoritarian regime in which even the President and the Prime Minister unknown shadow directors assigned the role of political puppets.

In this state, elections are a sham ritual, authorities do not have dominion, and in fact ruled by a corrupt state and municipal economic clan groups.

Why has it taken to arrange the play "Perestroika" and forced mode crush Russian system? At the moment no longer any doubt that the Soviet Union had an enormous inner strength of supplies, and the dismantling of the system was called sovetstkih external, not internal, economic, factors. Working in the archives of the former KGB in Moscow and the Moscow Region Chekhov-2, we were surprised to find evidence of counter-intelligence officials, who argued that the great disaster (explosion of RDX from Arzamas, disaster passenger trains and ships) could be completely sabotage.

After reading these materials, I and my colleagues began to appear a feeling that in the history of shock configuration of mass consciousness that all is well. Assist us and work groups SG Kara-Murza and his colleagues from the Department of Forensic Medicine of the First MGMU them. Sechenov Moscow. It turned out that in many ways the final steps "Perestroika" like a manipulative play. For example, the action in Riga and Vilyunyuse much like a rehearsal coup in August 1991.

Injecting into the society of the atmosphere of terror, delirium, a demonstration on central TV previously undocumented stories on crime and accidents, rabid anti-Soviet propaganda — it's all very well and coherently planned, to be random, spontaneous process. Means, as a result of any circumstances in the bowels of the higher echelons of the Soviet Union had decided to dismantle the system, and the solutions to puzzles that were involved in the forces and systems that support the stability of the system. Under these systems, we are aware of the KGB, the media, culture and education system.

Most likely, the first of the 1970s at the highest political control and SCST of the USSR was a tough belief that the continuation of Russian experience is silly. It is well aware of the then chiefs of health, agriculture, industry and defense. The reports, which the story of the KGB archives, very often contain allegations that if it does not increment the resource efficiency of the economy, the country will face a lack of raw materials, energy, labor and mental strength. And in the criteria for such a cool war was tantamount to failure.

For example, Y. Andropov in a note to the address of LI Brezhnev on September 25, 1973 wrote that "the Soviet Union has no scientific and technical basis for the creation of unique computer equipment for electronic communications networks, such systems companies IBM, Thomson, Westinghouse Electric." In a note dated October 10, 1974, he asserts that "the security of nuclear power plants, including those for the military power available to the Soviet Union, have limited reliability in store that makes possible large event with numerous victims."

In 1975, a group of professionals under the USSR Ministry of Agriculture has prepared a closed work, in what scenarios were calculated crop and livestock until 1990, when this is the first time it has been scientifically due to the assertion that if the crops in the Black Earth at the level of 15-20 quintals of grain per hectare, and in the Black Earth — 35-40 quintals per hectare, the RSFSR, Ukrainian SSR and Byelorussian SSR will experience a lack of food and feed grains from around 1985.

Another report marked "for official use", prepared in CEMI, asserted in 1975 that since 1980, "we should expect a significant reduction in economic growth." As a result, in 1975, work has begun to find a way out of "deadlock." She engaged in CEMI, IPM and VNIISI USSR. These three central institution to accumulate the best brains to systems analysts, and could not work out a modernization program from Russian regime. Offered only palliative measures like "gentle nature" (N. Moses), "implanted in the Soviet economy market segments" (Abalkin), and other actions that could only delay the end, but do not change the story.

Apparently, the KGB were well aware that there were only two options. The first was to save the country, comprehensive reform, which would have dramatically increased the productivity of labor, liberalized economic affairs, promoting saturated development of science, education and culture. The second option was perfectly known by the example of Chile and a number of African countries, where often enough in the 1970s, there were coups.

The essence of this scenario was that the government, faced with insurmountable difficulties enslave criminal groups who extended the well-being of their defeat by the economic freedom to subordinate classes and the power of removal of their resources. That's exactly the second option was attractive and Y. Andropov and his entourage.

KGB USSR was one of the stronger counter-intelligence world because he just could not take control of the country's communication, to stifle opposition and make plausible inconspicuous ideological dismantling of Russian cars. A settlement of the ideology of equality, universal earthly happiness of so-called socialism, paving the way for the imposition of capitalist values, bourgeois life. That was manufactured in 1980.

Andropov tried to make the appearance of discipline (reached delirium: arrested in the stores shoppers to find out, do not know who went to work outside normal working hours). In fact, it is the strengthening of discipline undermined the credibility of the Russian state, which worked for the purpose of conspirators.

Received at the head of the country's weak-willed and politically unwise, MS Gorbachev, the Kremlin puppeteers came close to his own goal. Gorbachev sincerely believed that the so-called "restructuring" will allow the Soviet Union to make a leap forward but in fact, virtually all of the provisions of applets, as we can judge by the book "Perestroika: New Thinking", were aimed at dismantling Russian system. And do not offer anything in return. And in the 1990s, the project launched 15 years earlier, had been completed. Government The Soviet Union disintegrated, the Republican elite got into real estate ownership of their own states, useless to anyone Gorbachev went to rest at the presidential summer residence, and who came to power BN Yeltsin quickly returned the authoritarianism that is similar to
the structure of Chile under Pinochet.

Practically speaking, the similarity was literally shot the palace Allende, Pinochet, and Yeltsin gave the order to fire cannons at the parliament. Actions in 1998, when as a result of the crisis was programmed robbed the middle class, just completed the re-division supplies.

In Russia, the two formed nadsosloviya. First — class subordinate, second — to obey. Estates owned by all the signs of the estate system: the status is passed down from generation to generation, the economic well-being is based on the redistribution of rents from the sale of resources, members of the classes are signs of differences have different "weights" in the state, etc.

The main problem of the authoritarian regime of BN Yeltsin was programmed in its structure. Estates government does not have the resources to reproduction mental capacity and innovator development. It exists only until such time as the working mechanism of the seizure and redistribution of rents. If as a result of the economic crisis, prices for the main export product — hydrocarbon energoelementy fall down, the Russian Federation will collapse. Its disintegration will occur, unlike the Soviet Union, in unchecked power scenario.

DA Medvedev acts as a conservative, although verbally states the need for reform. It does not suggest actions that could break soslovnuyu corrupt system, and retains the current order of things.

The team remembers heroes of the Kremlin staff exercises, which are calculated to use nuclear weapon, knowing it is guaranteed would be able to sit in a bunker, where they will be enough to end the life of food and drink. And the interests and lives of other people who will be burned by the fire of nuclear explosions, they are not exciting enough.

The current system is stable only up to the time left until the stores the accumulated time in Russian. When these supplies are exhausted, the country will have no mental zero, and zero cash. And it will be understood by all indication that the team is in the Kremlin is incompetent and should be re-elect. Then there is no other path of political development, on the other as a change of the foundations of the political system, in other words, the dismantling of a federal country, transforming the country into a confederation or a unitary parliamentary republic.

TWhich would be able to undermine the economic transformation of the soil stray survivals, but it will be the worst option as it will suspend economic and social development. Apparently, this is exactly we are waiting for the dashing 2010s.

Like this post? Please share to your friends: