The war against Russia is already very long and very, very successful. Of course, not on the battlefield, where we are all always beaten and hurt a lot, but where the West has always won and continues to win — in the information wars. The main goal — to show the inhabitants of our country, that they are stupid mindless trash, not even a second-rate, but somewhere 07.06 level, without past or future. And it almost proved — even the authors of many patriotic articles agree with this approach completely.
Example 1. Hedavno we celebrated the 1000th anniversary of Russia. When she appeared on the reality? The first capital (only the capital of a big country!) In Slovenska, was founded in 2409 BC (3099 years old from the creation of the world), the source of information — the chronicle of the monastery on the river bondsmen Mologa, chronograph Academician M. H. Tikhomirov, "Notes on Muscovite" S. Herberstein, "The Legend of Slovenia and Ruse" having widespread circulation and recorded many ethnographers. It is believed that Hovgorod built on the site Slovenska, I stuck to the leading excavations archaeologists as plausible. Literally, I was told this: "And hell knows. We're there already dug up Paleolithic sites. "
Example 2. It is believed that somewhere in the 8th century, wild and stupid good-for-nothing Slavs roaming herds of the forest, called to his Viking Rurik and said, "Rule thou over us, the great European superman, and then we are idiots, do nothing can not. " (Free account history textbook). Ha actually Rurik — grandson Gostomysla Novgorod prince, the son of his daughter was touched and one of the neighboring princes rank smaller. Was designed together with his brothers, as all four Gostomysla son died or were killed in the wars. Was adopted by agreement with the elders, and exceedingly to work hard to earn the respect in Russia. Source: Ioakimovskaya chronicle of Russian history at Tatishchev, "Brockhaus and Efron," etc.
Example 3. Universally inculcated belief that almost the only civilization of the past was the Roman Empire, the pattern of law and morality. In general, that gladiatorial Rome that modern indulgence looters in Iraq — one field berries. Moral of the Western world in particular has not changed and continues to be disgusted with the "savages", such as Russian, Chinese, and Dagestan.
The official history: the great, beautiful and powerful Roman civilization fell under the blows of smelly bushy savages. Ha actually ostochertevshie all (as it is now the Americans) have been geeks readjustment of the more decent neighbors. Golozadaya and barelegged, poorly armed Roman infantry (open textbook on the history of the ancient world, and marvel at the Legion) was worn by Men of steel tops and katafraktariev to horses' hooves. The main source of information — "katafraktariev and their role in the history of war" AM Khazanov. (The rest I do not remember, but anyone can rummage around for autosearch themselves. Lot of material — it simply is not allowed in school. "Bad").
The most interesting — where they came from "mopped up" Rome Huns? Ob, Ugra, the Volga region, the Urals, Azov … Graves partial arming katafraktariev found in Dagestan. You, fellow patriots, had long looked at the map? So where the Huns went to Rome? Why is the "wild Rus' in Europe Gardariki — Strange town called? Now it does not matter, because we are happy with the mugs celebrating 1000 years of Russia, Rurik believe came from Horvegii owner who founded Russia, and even, like, such a proud history.
4 Goals sent down the drain, cheeky bury as uninteresting — and no dog is not even vyaknula.
1:0 in favor of the West.
The second goal against Russian idiots. In the 8th century, one of the Russian princes board nailed to the gates of Constantinople, and to assert that Russia did not exist, and then it turns difficult. Therefore, in the next century to Russia was planned long term slavery. Hashestvie Mongol-Tatars and three centuries of submission and humility. What marked this era in reality? Do not deny to their INDUSTRY yoke, but … As soon as Russia has become aware of the existence of Golden Horde, there immediately went young guys to come … plunder of the rich in China to Russia Mongols. Best described by the 14th century Russian attacks (for those who forgot — the yoke is the period from the 14th to 15th century).
In 1360 Novgorod boys were fighting with the Volga River to the mouth of the Kama, and then stormed the great Tatar city Zhukotin (Dzhuketau near the modern city Chistopol). Capturing the untold wealth, ushkuyniki went back and started to "guzzle homespun coats" in the city of Kostroma. From 1360 to 1375 Russian made eight major campaigns in the Middle Volga, not counting the small raids. In 1374 a third of Novgorod took Bolgar (near Kazan), and then went down and took himself Shed — the capital of the Great Khan.
In 1375 the guys at Smolensk seventy boats under the governor Smolyanina Prokop and moved down the Volga. By tradition, they inflicted "visit" in the city of Bolgar and Sarai. And the governor of Bulgaria, bitter experience by offering great tribute, but, Khan Sarai capital was stormed and looted. In 1392, again took ushkuyniki Zhukotin and Kazan. In 1409 the governor led the Anfal 250 eyelet to the Volga and the Kama. Anyway, beat the Tatars in Russia is not considered a feat, and fishing.
During the Tatar "yoke" Russian Tatars went to every 2-3 years, Sarai fired dozens of times, Tatar sold in Europe by the hundreds. What did they do in response to the Tatars? Written complaint! In Moscow, the Hovgorod. Complaints remained. More than anything, "oppressors" could not do. Source of information on the said campaign — you'll laugh, but this monograph Tatar historian Alfred Khasanovich Khalikov.
They tell us so far these visits can not forgive! A school still talk about how clumsy Russian men cried and gave their girls into slavery — because, as a submissive cattle. And you, their descendants, too, the thought comes through. We anyone doubts the reality of oppression?
2:0 in favor of the West.
In the 16th century, came to power Ivan the Terrible. During his reign in Russia:
— Introduced a jury trial;
— Free primary education (religious schools);
— Medical quarantine at borders;
— Local elected government, instead of the governor;
— The first time there was a standing army (and the world's first military uniform — Sagittarius);
— Stopped Tatar attacks;
— Establishes the equality of all members of the population (you know that at the time of serfdom in Russia did not exist at all? Farmer was obliged to sit on the ground, you do not pay for her rent, and nothing more. And his children are considered to be free from birth, in any case!).
— Banned the slave labor (source — sudebnik Ivan the Terrible);
— A state monopoly on the fur trade, introduced the Terrible, canceled only 10 (desyat!) years ago.
— The territory of the country increased by 30 times!
— Emigration of people from Europe exceeded 30 000 families (those who dwelt along the defense line, paid lifting 5 rubles per family. Ledger preserved).
— The growth of living standards (and paid taxes) during the reign amounted to several thousand (!) Percent.
— For all the reign there was not one who was executed without trial, the total number of "repression" was from three to four thousand. (A times were dashing — think St. Bartholomew).
Now remember that you spoke of Grozny in school? What it bloody tyrant and lost the Livonian War, and Rus shaking in terror?
3:0 in favor of the West.
Speaking of stupid propaganda by Americans. Already in the 16th century in Europe came out a lot of brochures for every brainless layman. It has been written that the Russian tsar — a drunkard and libertine, and all his subjects — such as wild freaks. And in the instructions to ambassadors stated that the king — a teetotaler, unpleasant smart drunk not stand firmly, and even banned the drinking of alcohol in Moscow, with the result that "drunk" only in the country in the so-called "Infusion" (where poured) . Source — the study of "Ivan the Terrible" Casimir Waliszewski, France. Now Guess — which of the two versions of textbook?
In general, our textbooks are based on the principle that everything that is said about Russia squalid it — the truth. All that is said of good or intelligible, it is — a lie.
One example. In 1569, Ivan came to Novgorod, which had approximately 40,000 people. There was raging epidemic and smelled rebellion. According to the results of stay sovereign, fully preserved in the synodic memorial lists 2,800 dead mark. But Jerome Horsey in "Notes on Russia" indicates that the guardsmen were cut in Hovgorode 700 000 (seven hundred thousand (?)) People.
Guess which of the two figures is historically accurate?
4-0 in favor of the West.
Russian wild cry and cry. And they constantly steal and drove into slavery dashing Crimean infidels. A Russian cry, and pay tribute. Almost all historians poke a finger in the dullness, weakness and cowardice of Russian rulers, who were not able to cope even with plyugavenkim Crimea. And somehow "forget" that any of the Crimean Khanate existed — was one of the provinces of the Ottoman Empire, in which stood the Turkish garrisons and sat Ottoman governor. H and who do not want to blame Castro that he can not take a tiny American base at the island?
The Ottoman Empire, by this time, actively expanding in all directions, having won all the Mediterranean lands, stretching from Iran (Persia) and stepping on to Europe, going to Venice and besieged Vienna. In 1572, the Sultan decided to conquer the wild and at the same time as assuring European pamphlets, Muscovy. From the Crimea to the north moved 120,000 troops, supported by 20,000 Janissaries, and 200 guns.
Near the village of Molodi Ottomans faced 50000th squad governor Mihailo Vorotynsky. And the Turkish army was … No, do not shut down — cut completely!
Since then, the onset of the Ottomans at the neighbors stopped — and try to engage in conquest, if you army nearly half cut! God forbid itself from its neighbors to fight back. What do you know about this battle? Hichego? That's just it! Wait 20 years of Russian participation in World War II will also start to "forget" in textbooks. In fact, all the "progressive humanity" has long and knows — Hitler won by the Americans. And "wrong" in this area Russian textbooks time to correct.
Information about the battle at a young can generally be classified as closed. Not, God forbid Russian rednecks know that acts of ancestors in the Middle Ages, it too can be proud of! He will develop the wrong identity, love for the Motherland, its conduct. And this is — wrong. So, to find data about the battle at Moldodyah difficult, but possible — to specialized directories. Haprimer, in "Encyclopedia of arms," Kim wrote three lines.
So, 5:0 in favor of the West.
Stupid Russian loafers. Remembering the Mongol invasion, I always wonder — how they managed to collect so many swords? After all, only swords were forged from the 14th century, and only in Moscow and Dagestan, Kubachi. Such is the strange fork — forever we Dagestanis suddenly gets the same. Although, in all the textbooks between us always a pair of hostile countries listed. Nowhere else in the world have not learned to forge swords — it's much more difficult art than it might seem.
Ho advancing progress 17th century. Sabre gave way to other weapons. Prior to the birth of Peter 1 left quite a bit. What was Russia? If we believe the textbooks, approximately the same as in Tolstoy's novel "Peter" — patriarchal, ignorant, wild, drunken, inert …
Did you know that Russia is arming the whole of Europe advanced weaponry? Annually Russian monasteries and cast house there sold hundreds of guns and thousands of muskets, edged weapons. Source — here's a quote from the "Encyclopedia of arms":
"I wonder what the producers guns in XVI-XVII centuries were not only sovereign Pushkarskaya yards, and monasteries. For example, a fairly large-scale production was carried guns and the Solovetsky Monastery in Kirillov-Belozersky Monastery. Possession of guns and very successfully used Don and Cossacks. The first mention of the use of guns Zaporozhye Cossacks refers to 1516. In the XIX-XX centuries in Russia and abroad, it was felt that dopetrovskaya artillery was technically backward. Ho here are the facts: in 1646 Tula-Kamensky Holland plant delivered more than 600 guns, and in 1647, 360 caliber shells 4.6 and 8 pounds. In 1675 Tula-Kamensky plants shipped abroad 116 iron cannons, 43,892 kernels, 2934 grenade, 2356 musket barrels, 2700 swords and 9687 pounds of iron. "
Here you have a wild backward Russia, about which repeat at school.
6:0 in favor of the West.
By the way, from time to time, I found Russophobe, who claim that all written above may not be as even vysokoprogressivnye and development in Britain and France have learned to cast iron in the 19th century. In such cases, I argue for a bottle of brandy and leading man in the Artillery Museum, St. Petersburg. One of the cast-iron cannon, cast in 1600, there brazenly lies on the stand for all to see. 3 bottles of brandy at the bar, I have accumulated, but I still do not believe. People do not believe that Russia throughout its history and in every way Europe was ahead by about two centuries. Ho …
Conclusions loser. Hachinaya their school years, we insist that all our history like a huge cesspool, in which there is not a bright spot, a single decent ruler. Military victories or not there at all, or they lead to something bad (the victory over the Ottomans hiding as nuclear launch codes, and the victory over Hapoleonom duplicated slogan Alexander — the gendarme of Europe). All that invented ancestors — either brought to us from Europe, or simply unfounded myth. Hikakih Open Russian people do not, no one released, and if someone turned to us for help — it was slavery.
And now, all around are historic rights of the Russian kill, rob, rape. If you kill a Russian — is not banditry, and the desire for freedom. A lot of all Russian — repent, confess and repent.
A little more than a century of the information war — and all of us have sown a sense of inferiority. We're more like the ancestors, are not sure of being right. Look at what is happening to our politicians: they are constantly met. No person needs to bring Lord Judd on trial for promoting terrorism and cooperation with criminals — trying to persuade him that he is not quite right.
We threaten Georgia — and not threats. Denmark spit in our face — and against it do not bring even sanctions. Baltic countries in establishing the regime of apartheid — a policy shyly turn away. People demand to allow the sale of weapons to defend themselves — they openly call worthless cretins who on stupidity immediately kill each other.
Why should Russia be justified? After all, it is — is always right! Say it is not solved by no one else.
Do you think — just today's politicians are hesitant, but instead, just about, others will come. Ho will not happen HIKOGDA. Because the feeling of inferiority is laid not on the post of foreign minister. It begins gradually brought up from childhood, when the child say: our grandfathers were very stupid, stupid people, unable to carry the most basic solutions. Ho to them from Europe came kind and clever uncle Rurik, was their own and teach them. He created for them the state of Russia in which we live.
Poison, drop by drop, poured into the soul, and when the man comes home from school — he was accustomed to look to the West as a good owner, more intelligent and evolved. And when the words "democracy" reflexively begins to stand on its hind legs.
That the Western world does best — so this is an information war. Blow was dealt to the place that no one had the idea to protect — on educational program. The West won. It remains to show a little patience — and our children will crawl on their knees to the side and humbly asked permission to lick the owners shoes. Already crawl — a couple of days ago, I was able to see a piece of the program "Why Russia needs its own currency?" Correct. Then it will be, "Why do we need an army? '. Then: "Why state?"
West won. Party.
What to do?
If you do not want the children of slaves were doing — you need not shout that we will fight when the time comes, but to save them now. Hour has arrived, the war is almost over for the overwhelming advantage of the enemy. Huzhno urgently break the course of history teaching, changing the emphasis of training on the positive. My girls, yet, 4 and 5 years, but when they go to school — I foresee hard times. Claims about the poor quality of teaching is guaranteed. If the historian does not teach children to who was so important in the history of man as Rurik, or does not know about Molodinskuyu battle — then have to pay fines out of pocket.
And even better — make a claim to the Ministry of Education about the spread of false information. Hanyat good lawyer and hurt, hurt their kick — even itchy. Ho on the "good" I have one no money. Weak chip to save good name of ancestors?
The second way a little to strengthen the position of the fronts of the information war — require the procurator criminal investigation into incitement of ethnic hatred, by the false teaching of historical information. Examples — weight. Recall the Tatar yoke. We'd say that the oppressed Russian Tatars, but do not say that the Russian Tatars plundered no less dashing. In the end, there is a Russian insult to fellow citizens by race. Moreover, the offense is wrong. All of us are good and behave the same way.
Or, for example, last year in Kazan celebrated (or tried to say) day of remembrance of the Tatars, who defended the city against the Russian troops. Halitso obvious opposition by nationality. Although, in fact, the city took no Russian, and Russian-Tatar (!) Army. Cover strelets cavalry detachments provided Shig-Alley — and if he is German, I am ready to acknowledge himself Pope. Russian-Tatar troops took Kazan, eliminating the influence of Istanbul on the Volga River, and protecting civilians from the predatory raids freed thousands of slaves. Enough to recognize the part of the Tatars in this noble cause — and the national question becomes acute.
However, I is not a lawyer and do not know how to roll a statement in such a way as not dismissed and sent to hell.
By the way, there is not once mentioned the Dallas plan of inciting ethnic hatred. And no one paid attention, he realized. Also at school. Good teachers diligently sow discord among the largest national groups — Russian and Tatars. The whole course of the history of pearls tickle how Tatars attacked, as the Russian went on Tatars, etc. Ho is nowhere stated that the Tatars are our symbiote, people-partner. Tatar parts are always formed part of the Russian army, took part in all Russian war — and the intestine, and in the battle against a foreign enemy. We can say that the Tatars — it's just the Russian light cavalry. Or Russian — Tatar forged army. Tatars fought against Mamai at Kulikovo field with Moscow Ratiu, Tatars first attacked the enemy in the Swedish and the Livonian War, in 1410 Grunwald joint Polish-Russian-Tatar army shattered the Crusaders broke the back of the Teutonic Order — and, it was Tatars took the first blow .
Sometimes people ask me why I did not mention the Lithuanians. So mention — Russian. The Grand Duchy of Lithuania was the Russian state, the Russian population, who spoke in Russian, and even office work was conducted in Russian. And you thought that a little racist country on the Baltic coast was once a great nation?
7:0 in favor of the West.
We lived four thousand years of the Tartars, side by side. Fought, friends, and relatives. Crushed the Romans, Crusaders, Ottomans, Poles, French, Germans … And now, our children open textbook, and it drips from every page: enemies, enemies, enemies … Legally, this is called incitement to ethnic hatred. But in reality — the usual information war.