20 years after the Declaration of Sovereignty of the Belarusian independence has become irreversible? Or dabudavalasya Belarusian nation? Will finally Belarus "on the space, a wide expanse of" changing the current nenarmalnasts?
On these topics in the "Prague accent 'reasoning philosopher Valentin Akudovich, political scientist Andrew Kazakevitch and cultural studies Julia Chernjavskaja.
Listen to transfer to Sunday, August 1, and 18.05, 20.05, 22.05.
We offer you the pieces of gear. Full text will appear on the site later.
Akudovich: A little vtryruyuchy, we can say that the Declaration of Sovereignty of the Belarusians in the mass was seen as a regular occupation — the occupation of independence … Only through the power we are united into one … We are looking for a nation where it could not be. That national canon that developed the pioneers of the Belarusian revival in the early XX century — or he approached the Belarusians whose attention is not headed for the fate of cultural and linguistic values, and the values of the social order?
Kazakevitch: The value of independence can be for many only when the threat to its loss. At the very least, only then will we know how firm the phenomenon … Belarusian nation is not homogeneous in terms of interpretations of the past, present, and future vision, but rather, it is a natural and normal for a modern nation.
Chernjavskaja: When in the late 80's, many people involved themselves in the Soviet identity, and among the intelligentsia — and the Russian identity, the past 20 years, Belarusians, though uneven, irregular, but practically exclude themselves from it … At the level of civil nation, we certainly exists, but there is no unified identity … The characters that exist, not divided the whole of society, and even most of it.