Global politics becomes multipolar?

World politics is becoming multipolar?Developing countries in Latin America more enticed to discover the enthusiasm on the part of Russian, Chinese, European and American politicians. Their influence in the international arena is not comparable to high, although in some cases the world of UN member states is crucial in the confrontation of foreign units. To understand why now the eyes of the world are turned to the U.S. mainland, make out some highlights and main features of the development of such sovereigns as Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Mexico, Paraguay, Cuba. Also for understanding the value in the international game of Latin American countries should understand the role claimed by some of them.

The region belongs to the developing countries, but the level of success achieved to date varies between individual states. In particular, the highest rate of development is different Brazil. This government keeps the neo-liberal capitalism and enforces nearly 20 years with unnecessary policies to increase social welfare. The wide-ranging reforms in the social and economic sphere are held by the proceeds from the export of raw materials. The wealth of natural resources in Brazil attracts numerous investors, but the main trade and political partners are China, our motherland, India, Latin America and the adjacent country. At the present stage in the developing country there are severe problems of social character, which has allowed a rather long time. During the reporting period due to the poverty line could bring about sixty million people, which, of course, is a victory for the country. Brazil is now trying to delay progress, also continues to social change, as the difference between the rich and poor layers are still very high and causes acute contradictions. Together with the fact Brazil is the most safe and a comfortable state of South America.

In other countries, such as Mexico and Argentina, the economic hardship also added complicated criminal situation. In Mexico there is a large and very unsafe shadow structures, organized crime flourishes. But the positive trend traced and here. For example, in Argentina, the flow of investment in the province has never been greater in the history of the country. Intensively developed in the construction of small towns, introduced new systems of improvement, and evenly Latin American slums, eminent own wretchedness the whole world disappear and the streets begin to remember Europe. Law enforcement agencies of these countries, in the end, have gained certain of success, and the degree of security in large cities has increased substantially, providing additional finansovlozheniya outside. Ecuador for the first time drew attention to the environment and moving towards capitalism, the positive experience of Brazil. Saturated modernization is conducted now and in Colombia. So Makarov, one can conclude that the countries of the region, after a long and almost all over the disastrous impact of the United States is sure to come out on the path of building a social legal systems that take into account, first, the interests of their own people and country.

South American countries have different levels of development and the balance of political values. For instance, Brazil comes a part of such education as the BRICS, and Mexico conducts a pro-American policy. The contradictions in the foreign policy behavior of the region is the appropriate feature of these states, which even in the period after the war acted separately and inconsistently. Very clearly expressed reluctance to stick to a single lane in the discussion prepyadstviya Israeli independence and its recognition as a country, and then the entry of the United Nations. In previous years, some countries of the American continent shows his unwillingness to participate in the political game in the Middle East. Now the question is quite sharp, and the outlook of the Latin American members of the Security Council could be a defining issue in the adoption of Palestine in the United Nations. The possibility of joining the PNA members of international organizations sickens the interests of Israel and, therefore, the United States, because the Americans are trying to influence the decisions of the government of certain states.

Most of the countries in South America is using the situation to extract short-term gains and profits, but some operate on a sound and alternate strategies. For example, Brazil has led to exactly that voted "for", as well as its main political allies of our homeland and China, but the Colombian government has decided to abstain. The policy of non-interference can be taken and the other States of the region. Likely to support the Yankees and will vote "no" in Mexico, as well, perhaps, Chile. These countries are very dependent on the United States to make decisions contrary to the interests of the influential power. Americans have repeatedly expressed their guesses about the likely loss of Latin American countries in the event of Palestine in the United Nations. For Mexico, indeed, the main trading partner is the United States. In addition, the moneyed interest of this country produce large social investment projects, as well development urban infrastructure, because the government has a different view of this country can not be.

But the presence of votes in the UN far not the only fact which urges the international community to follow closely the development of the region. Relatively recently, a new tandem titled BRIC which later renamed BRICS. In the first part of this economic union includes such massive and influential powers such as China, India and our homeland, and from Latin American countries it is a member of Brazil with its resources and production potential. The volume of cash flows between Brazil and China is increasing every year, and turnover now represents a plausible share of the global total. In the conditions of the unstable situation in Europe and the U.S., BRICS gets unusual importance in the global political arena. Is too early to talk about the development of a multipolar world, but the beginning of the supply of guns to Brazil Russian Federation clearly indicate on its development in the coming term.

U.S. reacts very sensitively on the sample allies to withdraw from under the historical impact of other Latin American countries. Promotion of unity and brotherhood with the "great neighbor" is mostly in Mexico and Chile, but there is a sample of propaganda among the population in Brazil and in other countries. The existence of American democracy is becoming increasingly parasitism temper because South America with its large resources, including hydrocarbons, particularly attracts the attention of the United States. Baksova investment in the face devilish external debt more get candid disposition siphoning resources and threaten to destabilize the economy. In connection with such behavior on the ground in Brazil and other countries in the region increasingly intensified anti-American sentiment. Naturally, such a drastic expressions are articles immediately return character. These trends contribute to the strengthening of partnerships with China, India and Russia. In some publications, behold comparison to the impact of the U.S. in Latin America with fascism.

The global crisis, as a heavy blow to the Old World and the United States, nearly dropped the rate of GDP growth in Latin America. Countries as before continue to evolve thanks to be a demand for exported products. Home Buyer, as previously mentioned, is China, whi
ch is now the deterrent bad economic processes in its own monetary system. The threat of reducing the dynamics of development can occur only when the fall in demand for hydrocarbons, food and other products that have recently completely possible. Still, the threat of lower growth rates and even stagnation itself does not look too terrible prospect against Greece, the likely default States.

The enthusiasm of European States to South America, also explains the hope of gaining monetary support in times of crisis. By the way, an appeal for funds to support the foundation of the European Office of China stated that all money transactions are ready to carry out only through International monetary fund. Expressed a similar position and Brazil, explaining such a decision only the principles of equality in external relations. The money, according to the views of Brazilian politicians may be provided by European states to the criteria on which they are transferred to developing countries.

But the economic situation in the Americas region in the future spetsy value differently. For example, consider that a very large finansovlozheniya can not be perfectly mastered States, with the result that can be created "bubbles" that at some point lead to a destabilization of the monetary situation and the rapid outflow of investment. Translated into reality such speculation can cause intermittent inflation, and in the worst case of a default.

Yet, most of the predictions related to the upcoming development of the region and the continuation of the cooperation of some members of the BRICS countries, and others — with a pro-American bloc. It is also expected forthcoming struggle for influence with alternate success, which will depend, first, on the stability of the dollar and the activity of the organization investing.

Like this post? Please share to your friends: