Data center geofizacheskih NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Center Research) updated (revised) their location data from the shift of magnetic north pole position and projected to 2015. The pole shift, if you will continue to occur in the same direction, since it has accelerated dramatically in the mid 90s. But …
In NOAA made some significant and, apparently, the linear change in the position of the pole in the period from 2001 to 2010. The most notable of the changes was the general linear deceleration shift over the last decade, though it remains high — about 48 km per year. They projected data to 2015 and slowed the pace of movement for each subsequent year of the 48 km (2012) to 39 km (2015).
Was provided apparent reason for the change. Nevertheless, changes have covered a whole decade! Given that they suddenly changed danye previously published in the past decade to show a slow motion of the poles, they are now able to project tends to slow down in 2012. It's starting to look like the U.S. Geological Survey, where if the change rates of the magnitude of earthquakes, always (95%) decrease them. Changes are made to always "less disturbing" direction.
The following map shows the location of the north magnetic pole, and it changes from 1977. One can clearly see the difference between the annual measurements pole position when the acceleration has increased dramatically.
The following graph shows the comparison of the situation of the north magnetic pole in the original study and the new revised provisions (2001 and beyond) from NOAA.
While this may be the result of errors in the NOAA mapping and sorting data, surprising one: why the error was not detected at any time between 2001 and today. It took 10 years to find her? Hmmm …
Or, maybe it is a cover to slow the flow of information from the supporters of the theory of PS?
I guess we'll never know the truth until the poles can not be replaced.
|Old data NOAA||Changed data NOAA|
Please note that the author does not know exactly the data sets were changed at NOAA or other source it is made prior to treatment in NOAA. We also do not know the details of the reasons for the change, as they are obviously not advertised. It's just observation and opinion.