About supersubekte or 147 Committee

In the article "What is behind the attacks, information on the Fed?" I have already written about the research group of scientists of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (SHFTI) in Zurich. Results of the study were published in the middle of 2011 and served as a global media sensation of the year. Since then, many creators, including "information partisans", constantly refer to the work of the Swiss. Namely, the data from this study uses David Wilcock's own "Financial tyranny." Activists of the "Occupy Wall Street" also took up the computation of the Swiss group (references in posters, leaflets, brochures) …

The opening of the "core" of the world economy

Swiss scientists have put puzzle studies of individual parts of the world economy, set out to determine the vertical and horizontal communications companies, to answer the question whether the world economy "crystalline core" or it is a shapeless mass. The main thing for the Swiss sent a note — the role of the different companies in the capital of other companies. They were subjected to computer processing of large amount of disk imaging concerning 37 million companies and investors around the world and located in the Orbis 2007 database. After a rough preliminary "clean up" the array of companies from all "stuff" was left out of a group of 43 thousand transnational corporations (TNCs). Continuing in-depth analysis, scientists have identified a "core" of 1,318 companies, which accounted for about 20% of total sales of all companies in the database. In this study has not been completed. It was found that any of the companies included in the designated "core"Participates in the capital on average another 20 companies. So makarom "core"Controlled the establishment of a common difficulty for about 60% of world GDP.

The Swiss took the chance to dig even deeper. And inside the huge "kernel" (1318 companies) have found another little "core"Consisting of only 147 TNCs. Disk imaging of this small "core" of the Swiss do not provide very many.

In 1-x, these 147 companies between a tightly woven through mutual role in the capital.

In-2, a huge part of the small core (75%) are banks, insurance companies and financial companies. In the list of "small core" of the first number bank Barclays, the same as the first lines are prevalent Barclays Bank, JP Morgan Chase, UBS AG, Merrill Lynch, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs and others (the study reflects the situation in 2007, ie before the start of the financial crisis).

B-3, according to the Swiss, "small core" is in control of 40% of global assets, including 90% of assets in the banking sector.

"Information guerrillas" believe that the work of Swiss scientists just confirms the conclusion about the existence of a narrow group of people who are kept under the control of the world economy, money, and politics. Also, what exactly is a "small core" consisting of 147 companies (or more precisely — the owners) is that "a group of conspirators" with which "information partisans' struggle. Rather, in their opinion, to call this group is not a "small core" and supersubektom managing the economy, money and politics on a global scale. "Small core" even became known as the Committee of 147 — by analogy with the Committee of 300 by John Coleman.

Lightweight eye on the global economy

I must say that Swiss scientists, issuing a sensational "news", slightly scared. And, as if apologizing, became state that: 1) they do not believe in any komploty, and 2) it, they say, can only go on the economic, but not political power of the "small core", and 3) 147 companies have very disparate interests and it is not lawful for them to establish effective control over the global economy and politics.

In general, assume that the reason for such reservations — a feeble comprehension of the Swiss group subtleties of modern economics and money. The control group — James Glattfelder — a physicist-theorist, the members of the group — a specialist in information systems. "As such, the concentration of power for himself is not in itself is nothing either shocking or decent — they say researchers from Zurich — but it does not apply to closely related to the kernel of related companies. As we have seen in 2008, such networks are unstable. " "If one company falling apart — says J. Glattfelder — for others it fall apart. "

In such statements, I personally do not see any missing only Swiss awareness of the modern capitalist economy, and outright deceit. Because in the end of the 2008-2009 crisis. the core of the world economy does not suffer, and even more strengthened. The bankruptcy of "Lehman Brothers" in the fall of 2008, as rightly pointed harsh experts were of activities planned and carried out by the decision of all the big Wall Street bankers. At this bank were transferred to a hopeless assets of other banks, which allowed the latter to stay afloat and become even more strong "core."

Of course, inside the Swiss Open "core" has its contradictions and tensions. There is a constant covert struggle for control of the global assets and resources. At the top level of the hierarchy of the world there is a continuous and least publicized confrontation between the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers clan. At the subsequent level — their opposition to the participants, who gravitate to one of the 2-up betrothed clans. Detailed and impressive this struggle analyzed Yankees Nicholas Hagger in his book "The Syndicate. Creation story of hidden world government and how its impact on world politics and economy. " But behold, and even more so to realize the struggle inside the "core" by the methods used by the Swiss group, quite unrealistic. No supercomputer that identify failing.

Why is the "core" not only does not break, but, on the contrary, further cemented? Many circumstances — as impartial as well as personal. I mention only one personal reason — to strengthen blood and kinship ties between families, enjoy the company of the "core". In the middle of impartial circumstances — to save the world of a certain provision of free resources, the control of which are fighting clans. In the words of a classic, now we see the struggle for the division of the world. When this phase is complete, begin the struggle for the redivision of the world, then in the "core" of the internal stresses will increase dramatically, and it may appear unsafe cracks.

The picture that painted a Swiss, of course, is very lightweight. It turns out to mean, namely, the fact that scientists from Zurich communication between companies limited to the role in the capital. In their schemes, the only inventory control of the business are direct investment (ie large blocks of shares, shares, the share in the share capital). Meanwhile, in the criteria of modern capitalism all get a huge role "unincorporated" forms of control. In the first place among them — loans that provide the lender at least not in the least ability to make strategic decisions than traditional large stock (majority) shareholder. A loans — a tool which is in exclusive possession of the banks.

More than 100 years ago (in 1910), the basic position of the dominant role of banks in the economy of a mature capitalism proved the German Socialist Rudolf Hilferding (1877-1941) in his own well-known work "The financial capital." In it, he came to the conclusion that the banks with the passage of time will manage the company — at first within the state boundaries
, and then across the world. Banks will make production planning, appeals, exchange, and consumption. So Makar, the world, claimed Hilferding, get rid of the crisis. He called a model of a public unit "organized capitalism." In his view, this model with some slip of the tongue can also be called "socialism." By the way, during the last crisis, when the South American and other banks got billion and trillions of dollars from the U.S. budget and the Federal reserve system of the USA, America began to talk about the coming of the era of "banking socialism."

Now remember Hilferding occasionally. But to no avail: the modern world is dominated by banks in the economy and politics, is strikingly similar to that picture of the world, which is more than 100 years ago, drew this Teuton. Admirers of Hilferding split in explaining his vision: some consider him a genius, others are convinced that it was dedicated to the long-term plans of the global oligarchy, which throughout the twentieth century doggedly built the "banking socialism."

Supersubekt and the Federal Reserve

Thus, according to the findings of the Swiss scientists can say that again they "discovered America", to which they have already been discovered many times more. It is not taking advantage of the super-powered computers. All on the surface. Suffice it to recall the work of the South American researcher Eustace Mullins "The Secrets of the Federal Reserve," where he leads the lists of shareholders of the U.S. Federal Reserve. These lists are prevalent are the same banks that were "calculated" Swiss. Only the name has changed several banks, as the decades have passed since the creation of the Federal Reserve banks are shareholders as a result of mergers and acquisitions is constantly re-aligned.

You can also recall promulgated in 2011, the results of a partial audit of the Fed. The audit revealed that during the recent financial crisis the Federal Reserve porazdaval naikrupneyshim South American and zabugornom loans to banks for the astronomical sum of 16 trillion dollars. Was published a list of those banks with a list of certain amounts of credits. We litsezreem all the same set of banks (in parentheses are the amount of acquired loans Fed billion. Dollars): Citigroup (2500); Morgan Staley (2004); Merril Lynch (1949); Bank of America (1344); Barclays PLC (868 ); Bear Sterns (853); Goldman Sachs (814); Royal Bank of Scotland (541); JP Morgan (391); Deutsche Bank (354); Credit Swiss (262); UBS (287); Leman Brothers (183) ; Bank of Scotland (181); BNP Paribas (175).

As you can see, the list of banks have done much good — the same banks that are "calculated" Swiss scientists. Or due care or due to ignorance of these scientists are not even hinted at the fact that supersubekt has something to do with the Federal Reserve. Meanwhile, things are very common:

a) banks, which form supersubekt are the major shareholders of private companies under the name "Federal Reserve";

b) The Federal Reserve, having a monopoly rights on the printing press, supplies its own products, ie means the same selected banks, who are the owners of the Fed.

But the Fed funds purchased from the "chosen" banks directed to buying assets around the world — directly or through a non-financial companies under their control, receive from their hands a cheap or even free loans.

Like this post? Please share to your friends: