The award named Goebbels. Applicant: Svanidze

Homeland to love

And his. This truism does not know Nikolai Karlovich Svanidze. How else to explain his insatiable desire to tarnish his country’s history.
Rested over the summer, and with renewed vigor to the old.

In January of this year Svanidze already been nominated by readers and resources the January prize named Goebbels, but lost in a bitter struggle on the basis of the reader’s vote to Viktor Yushchenko. Lied at the time Svanidze on Poland, saying that Soviet Russia in 1920, invaded Poland, although this is completely contrary to the historical facts. Link
I do not know why, and why, but this time Svanidze as the theme for their fantasies chose Polish topic.
Applicant: Nikolai Svanidze
Merit: the program of Channel 5, "the Court of time," from 31.08.2010
Links: Link 1, Link 2.
Reasons for nomination: falsification of the history of Russia, the creation of the image of our country as an ally of Nazi Germany.
Put forward Alex Osin, commentator
Lie number 1.
The program "Court time" from 31.08.2010 for 19 minutes. 20sec Svanidze NK claims that the Soviet Union was an ally of Nazi Germany. Link
Svanidze considers himself a historian. We take the facts.
Non-aggression pact between Germany and the Soviet Union Reference
The Government of the USSR and the German government,
Desiring to strengthen the cause of peace between Germany and the USSR, and proceeding from the fundamental provisions of the Neutrality Treaty concluded between the USSR and Germany in April 1926, reached the following agreement:
Article I
The Contracting Parties shall refrain from any violence, any aggressive action, and any attack on each other both individually and jointly with other powers.
Article II
If one of the Contracting Parties become the object of belligerent action by a third power, the other Contracting Party will not support any form of this power.
Article III
Governments of the two Contracting Parties shall in the future in contact with each other for advice, to inform themselves about the issues affecting their common interests.
Article IV
Neither of the Contracting Parties shall participate in any grouping of powers that is directly or indirectly aimed at the other side.
Article V
In the event of any dispute or conflict between the Contracting Parties over problems of one kind or another, both parties shall settle these disputes or conflicts exclusively through friendly exchange of opinion or, if necessary, through the establishment of commissions to resolve the conflict.
Article VI
This contract is concluded for a period of ten years from the fact that, as one of the Contracting Parties does not denounce it one year before the expiration of the term of the contract shall automatically be extended for another five years.
Article VII
This agreement shall be ratified as soon as possible. Exchange of instruments of ratification shall take place in Berlin. The Agreement shall come into force immediately after its signing.
Done in duplicate, in the German and Russian, in Moscow, August 23, 1939.
For the Government of the USSR V. Molotov
For the Government of Germany Ribbentrop
Where is even one word about the union? Svanidze understands the difference between a diplomatic document between the two countries, where they promise not to fight with each other and the Union where one agrees to go to war over the other?
Non-aggression pact signed by Molotov and Ribbentrop, Germany does not protect or help her armed forces or other military means, if one of the High Contracting Parties, begins armed conflict with a third country!
A secret protocol to the treaty?
No one has ever seen the original of this document. Not in our or foreign archives do not originals these notorious secret protocols. USSR recognized their existence in the II congress of People’s Deputies of the USSR, after the report of the commission headed by the "foreman of perestroika" by Alexander Yakovlev.
Have been demonstrated only "photocopies of photocopies." However, a strong commitment to the destruction of the country then has been taken by Gorbachev and his henchmen. Destruction of Russian history, vilification and falsification — the most important element of it. So do not be surprised that, despite the absence of the originals, the Commission considered it "possible to recognize that the secret protocol of August 23, 1939 existed."
But even if it’s fake, what is called a "secret protocol", then there is no word about the union.
The secret protocol
To the non-aggression pact between Germany and the Soviet Union
In signing the Treaty of Non-Aggression between Germany and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the undersigned plenipotentiaries of the two sides discussed in a strictly confidential manner the question of the delimitation of spheres of mutual interests in Eastern Europe. This discussion led to the following result:
1. In the event of a territorial and political rearrangement of the areas belonging to the Baltic States (Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), the northern boundary of Lithuania is the boundary of the spheres of influence of Germany and the USSR. The interests of Lithuania in the Vilna area is recognized by both parties.
2. In the event of a territorial and political rearrangement of the areas belonging to the Polish state, the spheres of influence of Germany and the USSR would be approximately by the line of the rivers Narew, Vistula and San. The question is whether in the interests of both parties make desirable the maintenance of an independent Polish state and what are the boundaries of this state, may be finally determined in the course of further political developments. In any case, both Governments will resolve this issue in a friendly agreement.
3. With regard to Southeastern Europe, the Soviet side to its interest in Bessarabia. The German side declares its complete political disinterestedness in these areas.
4. This protocol shall be treated by both parties as strictly secret.
Moscow, August 23, 1939
Convinced? Come on. After the defeat of Poland, September 28, 1939, another agreement was signed between Moscow and Berlin. Maybe there are words about the union?
Treaty of Friendship and the border between the USSR and Germany on 28.09.1939
Article I
The Government of the USSR and the German government has set as a boundary between the mutual interests of the state in the territory of the former Polish state line that is marked on the attached map and when it will be described in more detail in the Additional Protocol.
Article II
Both Parties recognize the established in article I of state border of mutual interests and the final will eliminate any interference by third countries in the decision.
Article III
The necessary restructuring of the state in the territory west of the line specified in the article makes the German government in the territory east of the line — the Government of the USSR.
Article IV
The Government of the USSR and the German government has considered the above reorganization as a solid foundation for the further development of friendly relations between their peoples.
Article V
This agreement is subject to ratification. Exchange of instruments of ratification shall take place most likely in Berlin. The agreement shall enter into force upon signature. Done in duplicate, in the German and Russian languages.
Anyone read the contract can easily see that not a word about the union there. Why would grind stuff? A great mind?
From the great love of country? To which, Nikolai Karlovich? To what?
Lie number two.
The same program — 34 minutes. 04 sec.
Svanidze words — "eastern Poland, is captured."
Make no mistake — that Nikolai Svanidze called Eastern Poland, is actually a Western Belarus and Western Ukraine. That would matter what — somtrya where to look. Svanidze watching him from the West and the land seem Eastern Poland. Patriots of Russia look to the East and the West see the land of Belarus and Ukraine. You see how important the angle of view. We Svanidze He always west, always anti-Russian.
But in fact — the line on which the Red Army came in 1939, was proposed during the Russian-Polish war, the British Lord Curzon, and so in the stories is called: Curzon Line. London considered it fair demarcation line between Poland and Soviet Russia. Just Poland in violation of this line and the advantage of the situation, taking an "extra." In 1939 — justice has been done.
And yet, as far as I know, the modern border of Ukraine and Belarus goes exactly where was the border of the Soviet Union and Poland. No one other than Nikolai Karlovich Svanidze legitimacy of this border is not put into question.
Talking about a "Eastern Poland" would-be historian Svanidze neither more nor less, giving the Poles a reason to show territorial claims to Kiev and Minsk. Inciting ethnic strife, distorts historical veils. Or just do not know the history of their country? Or maybe he did and its not even considered?
In any case, it should not be a judge in the program "The judgment of history."
Losers of the stories can not be judges.

Like this post? Please share to your friends: