The competition science blogs this year. Positions of the participants evaluated the known scientific bloggers and journalists, as well as readers of the site STRF.ru.
We present you with the results of their vote.
Sergei proteins, flavorchemist.livejournal.com.
Maxim Borisov. Scientific editor of the journal "Science in Focus", a member of the editorial board of the newspaper "Troitsky Variant — Science"
Alex Vodovozov, uncle-doc.livejournal.com.
The doctor, medical journalist
Maljavin Maxim, dpmmax.livejournal.com.
Psychiatrist with strong nerves, the author of popular books
Dmitry Mamontov. Scientific editor of the magazine "Popular Mechanics"
Podorvanyuk Nicholas. Researcher SAI, Ph.D., editor of the science "Times"
Ian Pchelintseva. Editor in chief of the newspaper "Alma mater"Tomsk State University
Denis Tulinov, nature-wonder.livejournal.com.
In their spare time — science journalist
Vladimir Friedman, wolf-kitses.livejournal.com.
Ornithologist, ethologist, officer of the biological faculty of the Moscow State University
Within a month, the jury tirelessly to read posts of participants, divided into categories. Afterwards, members of the jury, independently of each other, had a post-graduation parties from best to worst. Next, the "place" in the party recalculated scores. Participant in last place gets 1 point, the next after him — 2 points, the winner received the highest possible rating in the category. Prizes were determined by summing the scores from each member of the jury.
As a result of our winners are:
In "Natural Science applied disciplines (chemistry, physics, technology, etc.)"
1st place. Unfortunately or fortunately, never came to define the best in this category, so much talent and diversity of the participants were. The winners were two — Aleksey Yakovlev for the post "Man vs Woman"And Arkady Kuramshin for the series "Lots of great substance"
2nd place — Andrew Rostovtcev for the series "Antivodka"
3rd place — grihanm.livejournal.com for the post "A little more on the self-assembly"
In the category "Humanities (psychology, sociology, etc.)"
1st place — fregimus.livejournal.com for the post "Sinister Valley, intellect and emotion"
2nd place — catta.livejournal.com for the post "A comparative study of the aura in mysticism and synaesthesia"
3rd place in the category share Victor Solkin for the post "The true name of Taiah"And antoin.livejournal.com for the post "Champagne fairs: how to grow and how to kill a cash cow"
In the category "Medicine"
1st place — Aleksey Yakovlev for the post "Arbidol and other myths about the flu"
2nd place — superhimik.livejournal.com for a series of "Entertaining pharmacokinetics" (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3)
3rd place — drnovikov.livejournal.com for the post "Great closing Jacques Benveniste"
In "Life sciences (biology, neuroscience, evolution, etc.)"
1st place — stelazin.livejournal.com for the series ‘Trust’ (Part 1, Part 2)
2nd place was shared labjournalcom.livejournal.com for the position of "Descent of Man" (Part 1, Part 2), And catta.livejournal.com for the post "Dreams of something bigger"
3rd place — undina-bird.livejournal.com for the position of "Polistovsky reserve" (Part 1, Part 2)
In "The theoretical disciplines (cosmology, theoretical physics, mathematics, etc.)"
1st place — victor-chapaev.livejournal.com for the post "About two brothers and the twin paradox"
2nd place — Artem Korzhimanov for the post "Quantum teleportation: debunking the myths"
3rd place — Nicholas Gor’kavyi for the post "Rings of Uranus — 1"
In "Genesis of Science (general science stuff, thinking about the scientific method, history and philosophy of science, etc.)"
It was assumed that fall into this category posts that do not pertain to a particular science, but rather to the scientific method, and everything else that is related to science. It was probably the hardest category for the jury, which caused a lot of controversy. As a result of these disputes trio of winners is as follows:
1st place — Andrew Rostovtcev for the post "About perpetual motion or spoiled phone"
2nd place — Renat Atayev for the post "On science and science"
3rd place — Alexander Panchin for the post "This text contains GMOs"
The reader’s vote was as follows: the site were posted links to all the posts that have passed initial selection committee. List of posts updated on the applications received, and the vote for each of them lasted for one month, that no one was hurt.
With a vote of readers, we decided to experiment and asked them to make an assessment on several pre-defined criteria. The experiment, in our opinion, was not very good. Popular bloggers get a lot of votes, with the highest ratings in all categories, and the assessment depended not only on content but also on properly conducted advertising.
The evaluation considered the following formula: Final score = "general impression" x 0.5 + "Clarity" x 0.2 + "urgency" x 0.2 + "original" X 0.1
Here is a list of winners by category with estimates, expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible. In summarizing the results, it was decided not to consider the participants, which was given less than ten votes. In addition, the derivation of the final grades are not taken into account the positions of those who, for all four proposed featured assessed "1 — Very poor."
"About the planet Neptune, Urbana Verrier and perturbation theory"
"Quantum teleportation: debunking the myths"
"Life sciences (general scientific things, reflections on the scientific method, history and philosophy of science, etc.)"
Number of Voters
"On the root of the training"
"New Trends in Education" (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3)
"On science and science"
This year, give prizes for the competition of scientific blogs have expressed a desire to sponsor two — Media center MSU and the magazine The Runet. Unfortunately, the Media Center of Moscow State University did not find among the bids posts on the scientific achievements of the University and, therefore, to present the prizes no one can. A version of the journal The Runet, despite repeated reminders, the time of summing up the competition and has not decided on the list of winners.
Despite this, the organizing committee of the contest exhales and congratulates the winners!