The tale of how one man deceives the whole world

To tell a lie, you need to refer to — such is the iron principle of "free media." To believe the information you need to present it not as the fruit of his imagination, and provide a link to a third-party source of information. Sometimes this rule is violated when forgers work too clumsy when they are in a hurry. So it was in Moscow, when the journalist wrote about Bozena Rynska arrival in Moscow existed in nature regiment of the Chechen OMON, referring to the journalist Kashin. Which in turn published the news with reference to Bozhenov Naryn.

But the world‘s media work yet professional.

But here, the strings can be traced. Let us ask the question: where are these "BBC" and "CNN" news about the events in Syria?

Information on the subject sent commentator Dmitry, for which many thanks to him.
It turns out all of the information the western media … is taken from one person!
Where he is, I hope you have guessed?

That’s right — in London. Where ever in the past 250 years hiding "freedom fighters."
Source referenced by all the world’s media, which are then referenced by all the Russian media called the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. And in this here ‘observatory’ and watch the human rights situation in Syria.

The staff of this institution is not blown out of proportion — just one person. He’s "director" of the organization on behalf of Rami Abdul Rahman. At least that’s what he calls himself.
So, the fact that the organization provides "news" about Syria almost exclusively, all of the major news agencies around the world.

Here’s the website of the organization Syrian Observatory for Human Rights in two versions, plus a facebook in English:…an-Rights/121855461256134

On the site (for example, in the department Contact us) you can find the information that the news of the organization spread Reuters and AFP. But also the other major agencies of the world referred to in the news about Syria on the organization, or rather simply repeat and replicate lie.

Here’s an example: "," reports more than 100 dead in Syria on December 20, refers to the news agency Reuters (Reuters). Here is a link to Reuters, which in turn refers to the organization of Syrian Observatory for Human Rights in London.
In addition, based on the words of the organization, this "director", governments make claims against Syria, which can be read in the same article report.

It turns out that one uncle, sitting in London of global public opinion? One gentleman in London is practically dictates the governments of their countries against Syria?

No. It just works "cistern." Outputs to the mountain West needs the information, and all the "independent media" pretend they do not know what quotes one person. Every day and every hour.

This is a conspiracy. There are exclusive agreement in the price of gasoline. And they punish anti-monopoly legislation. And then there is a monopoly on information and exactly the same conspiracy. All are required to take the information from only one source.

Doubt? Do you believe in coincidence? Especially for you by a German website has conducted an investigation and found that on Syrian Observatory for Human Rights of the great city of London the following link to news agencies, quoting verbatim:

«CNN, CBS, Associated Press, Reuters, AFP, BBC, Tagesschau, FAZ, Holtzbrinck, Springerpresse, Spiegel, Focus, Al Jazeera, al Arabiya und so weiter und so fort bis hin zu taz, Guardian und RIA Novosti.»

So there are some questions?

Why or why virtually all news agencies are taking the news of Syria in one place?
How is it that one person forming an opinion on a number of issues of the planet?
Why the governments of various countries, like parrots repeating the same nonsense, invented by one person?
Is it possible that these governments no intelligence, no intelligence, no experts on the region?
Can all of the above have been an accident?

Or just the UK and U.S. intelligence agencies and organized this whole circus?

To blow up the Middle East and build a large Islamic caliphate. As a tool for the future reorganization of the world, which at the beginning of the twentieth century was the Social Democrats and the class struggle, and in the middle of the twentieth century — Fascism and Nazism.

Like this post? Please share to your friends: