The last gasps of the third world

The last gasps of the "third world"Separation of rich and poor has long been no surprise. Almost from school every person in this country is brought to the attention that there are countries whose nationals or citizens who can not decide whether it is now, you know, the sea urchin eggs for lunch or do ordinary salmon, and at the same time, there are countries a large part of the population which is on the brink of survival. The latter are usually related to many countries in Africa and a number of Asian countries. In a situation of constant food shortages and can be no question of carrying out political and economic reforms. The main task of the people of these impoverished countries — to get food for themselves what ever likely methods: someone just goes to other countries, someone is engaged in poaching or the attack on the trade caravans (including the sea as the coast of Somalia) someone is trying to "grab" more humanitarian aid. Those who are not able to discover for themselves the appropriate channel for their livelihoods and mundane — food shall rejoice each lived forward to.

Due to the lack of supply of goods and Drug Administration, the average life expectancy of people 5 African countries does not hold up to 40 years. These countries are: Angola (average length is about 38 years old), Swaziland (32), Zimbabwe (39 years), Zambia (38.5 years) and Lesotho (39.9 years).

With all this money experts at such organizations as Saxo Bank, which often gives a fairly clear predictions about the food situation in the world claim to have almost the second half of 2012, prices for cereals and, namely, the wheat could soar as much twice. This will lead almost immediately languid consequences for states that provide grain and its population, and still have the ability to scale exports. But the country must import wheat, in such a situation may find themselves in a very difficult position. "It is very difficult" state and waits for the world's poorest countries, a large percentage of the population that survives only because of the importation of grain from Europe and North America at discount prices.

Two-fold rise in wheat can cause very real mortal blow to the countries of the so called third world countries. Already, the self-proclaimed government of Somalia on the ground have to ask for a total difficulties more than half a billion. bucks to buy sufficient food of strongest after the drought that occurred in Somalia in the past year. And in Somalia, this list is not only far government, where a lack of supply of goods has become terrible norm.

The rise in price of grain will rise in price of many other food products, such as meat products.

It turns out that the global trend to higher prices of grain could trigger a huge "hungry hole" in almost all regions of the world. In other words, the rich and relatively rich countries, almost aspire to, to once and for all to cut off such a thing as a "third world. " Has neither the European Union nor the United States do not want to so readily as 10-15 years ago to fund humanitarian projects in the same Africa. The European Union, which trying to fight its monetary hole allocates less money for the IMF, one of whose functions is to issue loans to the poorest countries.

You can imagine for yourself, which will reach the scale of the migration of the poorest countries in the world, if population these states will learn that no one ever again is not going to help them. According to some reports, one of the only European countries in Africa over the next five years could move more than 140 million people and this figure equals the population of the Russian Federation!

The globalization of the economy has become so vseobyatnoy that any attempt enrichment companies and groups of companies in one region can respond very poorly to any local area of the world economy.

The formula looks simple and terrifying: a sharp rise in prices of food — hunger in Africa and Asia — the millions of refugees — new aggravation of social issues — the economic deadlock.

But this does not mean that rich countries should take the target of endless patrons for the states, which were discussed above. All the more so that, according to many public humanitarian organizations, more than 40% of cargo being brought in as humanitarian aid, these countries simply stolen and then sold at market prices. And the obvious involvement in this corrupt scheme or have a specific local authorities, or criminal groups, which are the local authorities in the cramped "partnership." Because OUTDOOR "benefactor" and to the people, then do not really get it.

Can you talk about the fruitful assistance to the country, if about 95% of the adult population is unemployed. Inflation reaches astronomical figures in the hundreds of millions of percent a year, and the cash in the 10's local trillion cu — not far numismatic uniqueness. Specifically, this situation now reigns in Somalia, Zimbabwe and several other African countries.

It is surprising, but the economic characteristics of the same country Zimbabwe weird way went down after independence. The once prosperous comparable Southern Rhodesia in 1980, turned into "independence" Zimbabwe — and here began: massive repression against the snow-white population, confiscation of land, the establishment of local banks, which produced unsecured currency. Farmland turned into the arena of open warfare.

Without calling for the latest colonization, hunting ask the citizens of Zimbabwe and Somalia, Zambia and other similar states need this independence? Well, from whom all of a sudden, these countries have are independent? Is that the order of law and reason … And the existence of independence for the sake of the "tick" — a very controversial win.

But those same rich and relatively rich countries, for some reason not in a hurry to solve the issue. The thought of his decision contained in the plans of Muammar Gaddafi which tried at first to connect the north of Africa, the latest release of the single currency, and then, if successful final move to large-scale integration with other African countries. But the attempt to integrate, as well as strengthening the role of Gaddafi on the continent over, as everyone knows, very badly. And as a matter of unwillingness to go to the union so called "local princelings" and that the "powers" have decided not to tempt fate by not allowing Africa to embark on new paths of development.

For now, rich countries have decided to just forget about the poor countries, but whether poor countries will forget about me …

Like this post? Please share to your friends: