Serbia and NATO: Woe to the vanquished

Karel Schwarzenberg

Karel Schwarzenberg, First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Czech Republic — a country long recognized the independence of Kosovo, dal, finally, a clear definition of what everyone knew or guessed, but were afraid to speak out loud. Serbia — a country defeated in a war with NATO. Now, the West's policy towards Serbia is determined by this fundamental starting position: the losing party must pay the price war with the winner of resource and territory … As they say, vae victis — conditions always dictate the winners and losers have to be ready for any tragic turn of events. Schwarzenberg very honest: "This is nothing new. All have been well known. Serbia must make progress on the issue of Kosovo … Conditions everyone knows concessions can not be. I can only advise Serbian friends to take a clear decision and accept the fact that it can not be changed … Serbia lost the war. And the war is often lost territory! " (1)

Karel Schwarzenberg (born in 1937) — one of the most influential politicians in Europe. Schwarzenberg — the oldest Austrian genus known from the XII century. The most famous Adolf Schwarzenberg, Field Marshal, Imperial Count, in 1599 defeated the Turkish army in the Battle of the slave fortress — it was the first victory over the Turks in Europe. And the current cohort of the European ruling elite that owns and K.Shvartsenberg not opposed to the idea to give the Balkans Turkey "to be eaten." Karel Schwarzenberg, spent many years in Austria and Switzerland, as Schwarzenberg family was forced to leave after 1948, because their family was considered a symbol of German influence (or rather oppression) and the feudal terror. After the suppression of the "Prague Spring" in 1968, he actively sided with the Czechoslovak dissidents, and between 1984 and 1990. headed the International Helsinki Committee, it was his duty to register violations of human rights in the countries behind the 'iron curtain'. Under President Vaclav Havel, he became the head of the Office of the President (1990-1992). Among other things, Karel Schwarzenberg, considered the richest politician of the Czech Republic, calls himself a native of Central Europe with a Swiss passport (Schwarzenberg in the Middle Ages had the Zurich citizenship, and has a Czech Karel). Schwarzenberg is now the leader of the right-wing party TOP09, part of the ruling government coalition. October 20 this year First Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister of the Czech Republic Karel Schwarzenberg, the prince made a keynote speech as a candidate for president of the Czech Republic … (2) Since the most ancient representatives of the German ruling families of Europe, now acting as agents of the expansionist projects, drives the peoples of Eastern Europe into poverty and powerlessness, dictate the terms of winners Serbia.

In this aspect, five rounds of talks between Belgrade and Pristina (March — July 2011), sponsored by the EU, with U.S. support, are not even negotiations as such, for the Kosovo regime did not go to any concession. This kind of bilateral meetings in private with international mediation (or more precisely — the steering control), rather, is finalizing the terms of the surrender of the post-war Serbia. Why on earth should be carried out "three points" (recognition of acts of Pristina Serbia registry offices, personal documents and university diplomas) that do not have a settled legal status, unconstitutional, not ratified by the Serbian parliament or not at all legally appointed? Also added to them "agreement" on the representation of Kosovo in international forums as an independent state and the "integral" border management (West and Pristina are uniquely interpreted as state borders)? It should be emphasized: it — the unequal agreements it — acts of unconditional and unconditional surrender, only stretched out in time after the defeat of Serbia. 

On the new negotiations between Belgrade and Pristina, the same line will be carried out with greater rigidity. NATO's Center for Strategic and International Studies (Center for Strategic and International Studies) in November 2011, in its report pointed to the need to translate the dialogue of the future Belgrade — Pristina with the "technical" to the political level with the achievement of concrete results. Were offered items such as the inclusion in the agenda for the north of Kosovo and the "border Serbia — Kosovo", emphasis on "restoration" and ensuring the territorial integrity of Kosovo, conducting a joint campaign to increase international recognition of Kosovo, starting from five EU countries that did not recognize Kosovo, the transition from "international supervision" to the "development of the country", the completion of the European mission EULEX and the transition to the phase of the highest representative of the European Union (EU special representative — EUSR), acting in close contact with the U.S. Embassy in Pristina, Kosovo's inclusion in the visa process liberalization, the beginning of the negotiations with Kosovo to sign the Agreement on Stabilization and Accession to the European Union with a proposal to Pristina "road map" to the status of a candidate. (3) These items are systematically carried out, regardless of who is currently in power in Serbia.

British representative in the European Parliament Nigel Feridzh says: "All politicians in the Balkans only fulfill someone else's job … but the key issues are addressed in Washington and Brussels, not in Belgrade … and I find it funny when people ask me, when will the New World Order. Because it has long arrived. Good or bad — look at the global situation. It's all right or all flying into the abyss? Decide for yourself. Serbia to the abyss! Serbian politicians very intimidated and nervous, they do not know where to get the money … The problem is that Serbian politicians do not give trouble to solve something, just ask Washington and Brussels, what to do, instead of something to make themselves . Maybe the north of Kosovo will be Serbian. But it is unlikely. " (4) Daniel Server, for its part, points out that Belgrade must make a commitment to integrate the north edge under the authority of Pristina, and "now we need to give Belgrade authorities time to assimilate the idea." (5)

Meanwhile Pristina sold all marginal electricity distribution network "Elektoroenergeticheskoy campaign of Serbia", serving 400 million people, the Turkish concern "Chalikov and Limak" for 26.3 million euros. (This fact was disregarded Energy Minister of Serbia Zoran M., but that is not ashamed to cause an international scandal and go for odnostronnyuyu replacement documents at the time of the signing of Serbia and Russia on the construction of the pipeline. Moscow assessed the incident as a "scandal" (6)). Wesley Clark, former commander of NATO forces in Europe, and now the head of Power Corporation "Enviditi" from Canada, requires a license for the firm to explore mineral deposits in Kosovo for the production of synthetic oil from coal. The fact that 76% of coal reserves in Serbia (16 of 20 billion tons) are in Kosovo — is the largest and most efficient in terms of the development of coal reserves in Europe. However, the production of oil from coal — a rather dirty technology that is able to spread the environment, especially water. Nevertheless, the company intends to Wesley Clark to produce 100 thousand barrels of oil per day. (7) Albanian (Pristina), the privatization agency has illegally privatized a good half of the 1358 Serbian enterprises in the province, without the consent of the owners. This Millard euros! (8) And all these billions of dollars of loss does not already identified at the beginning of the negotiations between Belgrade and Pristina.

While I.Dachich H.Tachi talks with the leaders of the Serbs of the north edge (and they are a full party to the negotiations) refused to recognize the so-called agreement on "integrated border management", sending a letter to the president and the prime minister of Serbia and requesting a meeting with them and introduce them to a "platform for Kosovo and Metohija." However, in Belgrade, they have not yet heard. In general, the beginning of negotiations is characterized by the complete unpreparedness of the Serbian side, and therefore more like a surrender of positions in the "remote control". That is, the military aggression of NATO against Serbia must now be supplemented by the removal of the territory and resources of this country as an indemnity. However, the "winners" is far from assured in silent agreement with the Serbs 'legalization' seizure of Kosovo and Metohija. In the international legal aspects of Serbia's allies are Russia and China holds, does not give the north edge, and the vast majority of Serbian voters voted for Tomislav Nikolic, hoping for a change of policy in Belgrade, especially the Kosovo issue.

The official, according to the canons of international law, the recognition of the Serbian authorities 'independence' torn away from her territory by force will be completely irreversible, destructive to the existence of the state of the Serbian people.

(1) http://www.nspm.rs/hronika/karel-svarcenberg-u-ratu-se-gube-teritorije-a-srbija-je-izgubila-rat.html

(2) http://www.praga-ru.com/izvestnyie-lichnosti/karel-shvartsenberg.html

(3) http://csis.org/files/publication/111110_Bugajski_TransatlanticApproach_web.pdf

(4)

(5)

(6) http://www.nspm.rs/hronika/blic-nikolic-ljut-na-ministarku-energetike.html

(7) http://www.vaseljenska.com/vesti/otimanje-srpske-imovine-na-kosmetu/

(8) http://www.vaseljenska.com/politika/nova-faza-u-izdaji-srbije-poklanjanje-srpske-imovine-na-kosmetu/

www.fondsk.ru

Like this post? Please share to your friends: