In the Chernobyl zone in 1986 drove me against my will DMREO

Once a year in the last days of April in our mail many letters from those of our listeners who ponder neuvvyazkami Chernobyl, dominant years trying to comprehend the lessons and background of the catastrophe Belarus 20 one year earlier.
Victor Butoh from Minsk — one of those hundreds of thousands of people who, after April 26, 1986 had to go to the Chernobyl zone, so after the accident rescue people and property.
Go there voluntarily sovereign Butoh was not going to. In his letter, he says:
"In the area drove me against my will DMREO Russian Minsk. While I attended a course trolley drivers, and guide me had no right. But they did not look at it.
Technician sent a military unit, and held the 30-kilometer zone contaminated by radiation from which it was sent to the population, from 22 July to 27 November.
Ibid rascals in uniform September 9 made me one arm incapacitated disabled — after I performing on duty military unit, not allowed intoxicated marauders steal food from the kitchen. After version spent two weeks in the clinic. "

Next to his own letter outlines Victor Butoh his life after Chernobyl. And it is in almost everything consists of upholding the rights of the liquidator:
"I selected health, I turned into a disabled invalid. And still have to work on nepriznatelnoy, unsafe and very weighty work" Zelenstroy. "Must take a lot of pharmaceuticals, to somehow live.
At one time, such as I, the Russian government has given a lot of privileges and benefits. But by December 1991, these rights are constantly being violated or are selected by those who are not liquidators, through stupid and merciless laws, regulations and decrees. I try to defend their rights, and through that I have many times humiliated and insulted. "

Can posoboleznovat, sire Butoh, for you and those like you. Although return all former benefits is unlikely to be. In the late 1980s and first 1990s Belarusian and Russian parliaments, seeking voters have caught on a wave of populism, these benefits are not spared.
And it turned out that only in Belarus different kind benefits were entitled to several million people — a quarter of the population. What budget can withstand such a load?
Another thing is that the people who really were in a terrible state-oriented zone and lost health and performance there must be worthy of compensation and pensions.
Letter from the village of Luban Nyazharavka area from our listener Nicholas Milos — also on the consequences of Chernobyl:
"April 26 in Minsk" Chernobyl Way "will be many supporters of the movement for the fact that the martyrs were still alive to protect from abuse perpetrated by the power to go back to the affected system rehabilitation, which terminated on trumped-up reasons.
Committee "Chernobyl Way" quite rightly notes: time zatsiskannya democracy Belarusian authorities changed attitude towards state failure since Chernobyl problem prevents simulate the prosperity of the country.
As a result, such people care about recognizable "flourishing" bursting at the seams: people dying, and genocide civilization lasts Stalin’s criteria. "

I think, sire of Milos, the definitions of "genocide" and "Stalin’s conditions" should be used still more circumspect. Naturally, the power does not contribute to the organizers of the "Chernobyl Way", and eyes the government and opposition on the problem of the consequences of Chernobyl are very different.
Yet, all these years "Chernobyl Way" Minsk streets passes — despite all the obstacles and limitations.
On the topic of the authorities’ responsibility for the fate of the victims of Chernobyl reflects in our own writing davneshny listener, a retired officer of Nicholas Kanahovich Pruzany:
"Those who are directly or indirectly to blame for this disaster, not only did not suffer a corresponding punishment, but on the contrary — now occupy the highest positions of municipal or influence the municipal policy.
Over the past years, they even had the audacity and already started to prepare the construction of modern nuclear power plants — now on the ground inside Belarus. Not special even perfectly clear that the construction of nuclear power plants in Belarus no longer economically viable, and most importantly — it’s not safe, because no one can guarantee the safety of a nuclear power station. "

Next in own writing Kanahovich Nicholas recalls the beginning of the 1990s, when the democratic opposition in the Supreme Soviet of the 12th convocation unsuccessfully tried to raise the issue of compensation for the loss suffered by Belarus of the consequences of Chernobyl.
Another quote from the letter:
"The parliamentary majority of then flatly refused to recover from RF three hundred billion dollars. And later, President Lukashenko set point in this matter, and has forever — because the statute of limitations when could through an international tribunal to raise this question, completed in 1996, the year.
Now there recently: every month on the 26th in all media-independent names to call traitors who voted against the Supreme Council of compensation for the damage Russia. Belarusian people should know and keep in mind those who robbed him.
If then they voted because you have to, now would not raise the issue of energy security of Belarus. "

Even if all the members then voted unanimously to seek with Russia 300 billion dollars, it’s not meant to, sire Kanahovich, Our homeland that obediently agreed to pay those billion.
In particular, then, first of 1990, when she herself had practically lived in debt, borrowing Western countries. On the other hand, using the pro-Russian rhetoric, the Belarusian regime all these fifteen years had the opportunity to get underpriced Russian oil and gas.
Acquired such makarom amount measured by tens billions of dollars, and accused you, sire Kanahovich, deputies can appeal to this fact: if then quarreled with Russia, these billion, likely would not have received.
And in general, the question of responsibility for the Chernobyl complex and contradictory. How, in general, and the construction of modern nuclear power plant in the area of Belarus.
Your, sire Kanahovich, categorical assertion that such a facility is uneconomical for Belarus — wrong. Electricity purchased at a nuclear plant, Belarus, has almost no own oil and gas would be significantly cheaper than generated at thermal stations.
Another thing — the problem of security. But it is already quite close to the Belarusian nuclear power plants abroad four adjoining Russia, Ukraine and Lithuania. And in this sense feel harmless from so called "peaceful atom" Belarus still can not.
April 25 in Moscow, Boris Yeltsin buried — the first president of the modern Russian politics, which is associated with the name of the collapse of communism and the disintegration of Russian Union, the emergence of the post-Soviet space, the new independent states, in including and Belarus.
Creator of the 1st electric letters on this topic — Ales Osipov from Minsk. A listener writes:
"Now for some reason all remember only that Yeltsin promoted the disintegration of the Union of Russian and independence of the former Russian republics.
A saga of the creation of so-called "allied countries" — is not Yeltsin’s things? Through it all, we are a bit continued independence. If Lukashenko then showed more skill and ingenuity can be fully, we would live now in a completely different state.
It seemed weird that Yeltsin positively evaluate and Shushkevich and Lukashenko. What, if not the inconsistency of policy, it may indicate? "

Of course, sire Osipov, Boris Yeltsin was controversial politician in the rich biography that easy to find a lot of episodes for which it with similar enthusiasm can praise
or blame, and right and left, and the Communists, liberals and Shushkevich and Lukashenko.
Chain of facts that are hard to refute: not hard to imagine Yeltsin will viskulevskim agreement in 1991. And without Viskuli could hardly talk about the independence of Belarus.
While, on the other hand, the road to the Bialowieza Forest ran through the hard fight for power in the Kremlin between Gorbachev and Yeltsin, and Viskuli were logical end of the match.
Boris Yeltsin, who praises Alexander Lukashenko — is another Yeltsin standard second half of the 1990s, when he somehow tried to appease imperial insults and humiliations of their own citizens, who could not forgive him for the collapse of the USSR.
And playing "Federal Government" were at the time for the Russian president is perfectly reasonable. Although what to any fruitful result for Lukashenko did not lead — it is also a consequence of Yeltsin’s policy.
Thanks to everyone who found the time to write on "Freedom." Write. Waiting for new posts.
The program "Mailbox 111" airs every Wednesday and Sunday. Creator, you can write to the address

Like this post? Please share to your friends: