A.Dobrovolsky: The crisis in the opposition, but this does not mean that we are not together

Two months later he fiftieth anniversary. In 1982 graduated from the Faculty of radyefizichny, in 1995 — the law school Белдзяржуніверсітэта.Напрыканцы Russian era was a deputy of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, became part of the Interregional Deputy Group — the first democratic parliamentary opposition in the USSR. Worked with Andrei Sakharov, BAris Yeltsin, Anatoly Sobchak, Vasil Bykov, Ales Adamovich. In the Supreme Soviet of the 13th convocation elected chairman of the subcommittee on media info and relations with public associations. Member of the Political Council of the United civilian party. In 1990 he was one of the initiators of the creation of the United Democratic Party (ACCA) — first registered in Belarus opposition political party. In 1992 — the founder of the independent Institute for Socio-economic and political research. Now he — Director of East European School of Political research.
Here are some answers Alexander Dobrovolsky questions from the audience RadyeSvabody:
… The crisis in the opposition, but this does not mean that we are not together. The main reason, it seems to me that there is not a general awareness of what needs to be done together.
… Split the abyss disappear when social tensions caused by the search for the enemy.

Splits disappear when the power goes in society caused by the search for opponents

… The main thing at this point is not who will have what position, and that all members of the democratic movement were excellent for yourself, you need to work together. And, in-2, that were made conditions in which changes every follower would know the main activities and could join it without any permission from the party or other structures. It would work for a common goal, even those people, who do not like each other.
… Zenon Pozniak did a lot in order to Belarus became independent state. With all this I can not agree with what he says at the moment on all participants in the democratic movement.
… How do I relate to the idea of substitution Anatoly Lebedko as managing party? If you have such an idea with which I disagree, but recognize the right of the fact that she was you, in other words the usual way merit this purpose — to join the party and to persuade her friends to choose a new chairman. In the meantime, enjoy the confidence Anatoly Lebedko, and he also enjoys my support.
… I believe that in Russia there are many supporters of Belarusian democracy, and we need to work with them, despite the fact that, in general Our homeland holds chauvinistic policy towards Belarus.
… I love to read Bykov, Karatkevich. Notable new works by Vasily Yakovenko. Of young like Andrey Fedorenko. In poetry — small expert, but read with pleasure Gennady Buraukin, Nile Gilevich, Ales Pisarik, Anatol Sys.
… I believe that the Belarusian people is not something homogeneous, and people are thinking differently is at the moment. The question is when they will make decisions based on reliable disk imaging. For almost all of this to be done first — do media projects, which are currently developed for Belarus, efficient, so that people know the truth, then they will think differently.
… I believe that the Belarusian language should be central to the Belarusian state, but this issue needs to be addressed very, very neatly. We have already had such an example, when a great desire to return to Belarusians own language faced with a misunderstanding of many people, and we have lost the support these people. At the moment, it’s just impossible to do. In 1-x, you need to ensure the right of every person to read the language in which he wants to, and in-2, you need to ensure that municipal employees who work in the bodies of state power, knew whiteRussian language and people responded to the appeal in the language, which is a state.

Tags: public, editor, Dobrovolsky

Like this post? Please share to your friends: