A prerequisite of any architectural work — and that we consider his main task — is to introduce certain changes in space and time. The extent of this influence is determined by the reaction of a person as a social being, on some of the trends in the environment, as well as the epitome of what he saw in the idea and the architectural solution of the object.
This personal response is even more important because it reflects the individual qualities of the author, and giving impetus to the creative impulse. If the architect will be able to find and fix the changing flow of life, without abandoning themselves to please the fashion trends, "isms" and fleeting look, demonstrating its position and attitude with the help of analytical and fair principles of operation, then it is likely to be ready to create your own system of moral values, or at least the foundation.
First of all, any architectural work should bear the emotional burden. The creative interpretation of the natural and artificial environment, as well as their history, should be reflected in the appearance of new buildings. Thin newly created connection with existing as well as the border between the old and new, as the conflict between the mind and the soul, between form and function — that’s what has to be decided.
Architecture (at least, it is the area that we are interested in) — is part of the «art of living». The ideas expressed by architectural means, are not something inviolable, permanent. On the contrary, they are constantly reviewed and adjusted in connection with the new challenges, or for the sake of artistic ambitions. It is necessary to arouse the audience emotional reaction to aggravate sensitivity and leaves open the possibility of development. A variety of overreliance "isms «and dangerous tendencies that we do not Let us feel this task adequately.
Primitive approaches and simple aesthetic solutions make us numb after a while we no longer notice them monotony, we get used to them, and they become invisible to us. In other words — many architectural decisions from an emotional point of view, inexpressive, and it feels like a creator and consumer.
To the art of life, embodied in the architecture through its content and form, could be preserved, stereotypes should be reviewed. At each stage of development of mankind has the appropriate aesthetic standards and related styles. Each new work of art is the question of the application of the rules, or overcoming them, they are improving, partially destroyed, or at least changed. Every work of art is related to the approval of new standards, but it should be understood that in the future they will come into conflict with the new, and will also be adjusted or canceled. Art and artists need in this process — a condition for creating the aforementioned «art of living».
I want to draw attention to another interesting phenomenon: when the completed work of art, can be seen only. how it differs from the environment, not what it will bring to society in the future. Only after some time it can be evaluated as an integral part of the whole. Over time, the newly established forms of alienation disappears, it becomes part of the environment.
We believe that any change, modification or interpretation of the form (as if we did not call), and demands respect in-depth study of what is discarded, changed or interpreted. After all, the germs of new ideas emerge from the existing ones. As an artist, as well as any work of art can not exist without roots".