Global warming is a myth

 

Global warming does not depend on human activity.

Global warming does not exist. And I’m not the only person trying to get people to open their eyes and see the truth. But few have heard, despite the fact that I was the first Canadian PhD in Climatology and I have comprehensive training in this area, especially in the area of climate change and its impact on human history and the whole person.

I have a Ph.D., University of London (England), I was a professor at the University of Winnipeg, but I still can not hear. For some reason (actually — for many) The world does not hear me. Here is why.

What, after all, would happen if tomorrow we were told that the earth is flat? Perhaps this would be the most important news in the media, which would cause a lot of discussion. So why is no one can hear, scientists, who for years have studied the phenomenon of «global warming» and repeat with Confidence, that the reason for this are not people (industrial activity — approx. Ed.)? Why no one recognizes that the king is not dressed?

Believe it or not, global warming and the increase in the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere has nothing to do with the man. This is actually the biggest mistake in the history of science. We spend time, energy and trillions of dollars, and at the same time, unnecessary fear and dread of the problem that has no scientific evidence. For example, representatives of the service for the protection of the environment in Canada boast that spent 3.7 billion over the past 5 years, engaged in solving problems of climate change, spending almost all of the propaganda to protect unprovable scientific position while at the same time closing weather stations and enduring failure to achieve goals related to pollution.

No sane person would not go to the conflict, especially with the government, but if we are not the pursuit of truth, then we will die as individuals and as a society. That is why I insist that there is no evidence to confirm the negative human impact on global climate change. Recently, Yuri Izrael, Vice President of the United Nations, by funding the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) confirmed this fact. While the world will know that something is wrong?

Perhaps for the same reason we blindly believed 30 years ago that global cooling — the greatest threat: as we see it — a matter of faith. «It is a cold fact: global cooling brings to mankind the most important social, political, and adaptive challenge that we had to deal 10,000 years ago. Your participation in our decisions is extremely important, and this is associated with self-survival, our children, our species.» — Wrote Lowell Ponte in 1976.

I was against a fictional global cooling, and against the warnings about global warming. Let me emphasize that I do not deny the incident occurrence. The planet warmed to 1680, there was a decline of the cold period, named Ma? Lym glaciers? Vym period? Odom, who for the most part continues to the present time. These climatic changes are inherent in nature and easily accounted for by changes in the Sun. And nothing unusual is happening.

Since I received a Ph.D. in climatology at the college of Queen Mary, University of London (England), for the period of my career has been two climatic cycles. Temperature decreased from 1940 to 1980 and in the early 1970’s global cooling became the consensus. This confirms that worked out by joint efforts opinion — this is not a scientific fact. By the 90 th year the temperature began to rise, and now global warming is a consensus. It seems that I will see the next round, if I go to a pension, as now, the mechanism of the climate and the temperature of the planet tend to cooling.

No doubt passive acceptance of all of this does not bother the human mind, so is easier to live, a career does not suffer. The experience I gained in my personal life during the last years makes me understand why most people prefer not to express the fear of retaliation and get a job loss — that’s the reason. Even in University, where free speech is encouraged, in the classroom all silent.

I once had a three-page letter, which stated that my lawyer has received from my academic colleagues complaint for libel, that I had no right to say what they said, especially in public lectures. Sad, but from experience I know that the universities — the most dogmatic and tyrannical place in our society. Gradually getting worse as they receive funds from the government, which requires a certain point of view.

In another case, I was accused of a Canadian expert on the Environment David Suzuki, is that I get paid oil companies. This is false. Apparently, he thinks that if the fuel companies pay, then you have a hidden agenda. So if the «Greenpeace» club «Sierra» or the government pay, they have no hidden agenda and only truth and enlightenment?

Personal claim — made the complex and should not happen in the discussions civilized society. I can not blame them only what they actually are. They usually indicate a person or group who lost the debate. In this case, they also indicate how political in general has become a «global warming».

I’m not the only one against the generally accepted myth. Several famous people have raised this issue, too. Michael Crichton, the scientist, writer and filmmaker is one of them. In his latest book, «The World in fear,» he wrote in great detail about the so-called «global warming.» «So-called» because Crichton firmly believe that global warming — the myth created by unscrupulous scientists.

Another cry in the wilderness — a cry of Richard lenses. He — atmospheric physicist and a professor of meteorology at MIT, renowned for research in the field Dynamic meteorology, especially in the field of atmospheric waves. He is also a member of the National Academy of Sciences and has held positions at the Chicago, Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Lenses often speaks out against the idea that global warming — it is the work of man. But no one seems to hear.

I think maybe it’s because most people do not understand the scientific method which Thomas Kuhn so skilfully and briefly described in his book «The Structure of Scientific Revolutions». Scientist makes precise assumptions, and theorizes that the same fact, as speculation. Global warming theory states that CO2 — is an atmospheric greenhouse gas and as its quantity increases, so does the temperature. Then theoretically predicted that if a person was producing more CO2 than before, the temperature would rise anyway. The theory was not tested and it was even the law.

As lenses many years ago, «before agreeing to come down before the start of the study.» Now, any scientist who dares to test the knowledge, will be isolated and called a skeptic, but at its core will be a great scholar. In this case, to the scientist threats and accusations fly in denying climate change with different connotations. In fact, conventional scientific method destroy.

Meanwhile, we hear politicians and most of them have no knowledge and understanding in the field of science that studies climate and climate change. Hence it appears that they have no right to explore policy on climate change when it threatens the entire planet. Moreover, the spread of fear and hysteria complicates informed decision.

As long as you bring common problems, you have no idea what disgusting people can be. As long as you review the issue, trying to get to the truth, you have no idea how much disinformation everywhere.

I was strongly influenced by Aaron Vildavski book, «Yes, but it is there truth?» Author taught political science at New York University, and understand how it is affected by politics. He gave the job to the graduates to do research without contacting the highly publicized policy on environmental issues. To his and their surprise they found that it could be a little bit to understand and justify. Can you imagine what will the data Vildavski if push the question he stated. Students Vildavski do so under Security Academy and explained that it was a job. Understandably, this is a complex issue and it is not equal to the real world, though, I believe that this is the most important issue if we want to improve in the right direction.

Source:3rm.info

Like this post? Please share to your friends:
SQL - 47 | 0,261 сек. | 10.87 МБ